Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Details iTunes Changes Coming in macOS Catalina
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
1 thing I’m concerned about is WIFI sync. I see no mention of that. It’s great that device management is now integrated into finder. However, I want to see all my iPhones : iPads without disconnecting/ reconnecting them physically to my Mac. I hope apple realizes this
Where’s the “Apps” tab in this new UI. Many times I’ll buy/download an app, only to find the new version sucks. How can I revert back to the previous version in this “new and improved” iTunes sync?! Once again it appears Apple is removing choice and control from the user.
This option has been long gone since iTunes 12.7. Either stick to iTunes 12.6.5, or buy iMazing or similar apps to sort of restore that functionality. But you can see it now that tech companies take away more and more options from people while giving no compensation in return.
Allot of this transition can also come to Mojave as well. But probably won't. They'd need a reason for users to upgrade.
They've removed the ability to sync apps even in standalone iTunes ...some time ago
http://osxdaily.com/2017/09/13/itunes-12-7-update-removes-app-store/
They've removed the ability to sync apps even in standalone iTunes ...some time ago
http://osxdaily.com/2017/09/13/itunes-12-7-update-removes-app-store/
Last edited:
Not true, Apple continues to provide Enterprise version of iTunes to manage apps. Hopefully they continue to do so. I’m guessing Apple will likely kneecap 3rd parties from that functionality going forward as well.
Yet another reason why Apple will never succeed in the enterprise.
They don’t even bother expanding their presence in enterprise world. No wonder why they won’t succeed. And yes, I am using that enterprise version to sync my device. At some point there gonna be more and more difficult To download app packages for sure. No compensation.
For now it is a marketing term. Let’s hope in ions 13.4 Apple can actually deliver this promise.
So what if you aren’t upgrading to Catalina? Do they offer new versions of iTunes to sync to iOS 13 devices or are you SOL?
No. Pretty average, if not slower than iTunes.
[doublepost=1559798058][/doublepost]
I sync my device running iOS 12 using iTunes 12.6.5.3 just fine.
Sure, but I’m running OS X 10.9.5 (Apple arbitrarily decided it won’t sync iOS 11 or later devices). And I have too many production apps that break under later versions of Mac OS. I had to scrounge a less powerful iMac just to run 10.10 so I can sync an 8+ on iOS 11.
It’s death by a thousand cuts with Apple... no sync, no app management, no Touch ID, that notch, etc, etc. Galaxy Note 10 will be my next phone, and a non-Apple desktop. On the plus side, maybe they’ll keep iTunes alive on Windows.
Last edited:
I disagree. It makes a lot of sense to break them up.
Presently, you cannot make a local backup of your iPhone or iPad without iTunes. It means that iTunes has to be open at all times for automatic backups to work, while wasting CPU and memory. The overall iTunes interface isn’t optimised for the different media kinds it supports. You can already see this by comparing the new apps side-by-side. There are new buttons and controls and the TV app has a wholly new interface. iTunes has to use distinct menus in the menu bar for the different media types, making the app overall more complicated as a result. Putting everything into a single-window app means that any notion of multi-tasking isn’t available.
Finally, it makes a lot of sense for Apple to keep these products apart. Podcasts and the TV app appear to be new code bases, based on iOS (they use Marzipan/Catalyst). Going forward, they can improve individual apps more easily without having to backport the changes just for iTunes.
As an aside, iTunes has a mixed reputation with extremes on both side. Some people love it, some people absolutely despise it. It may be an opportunity for Apple to make the apps better and free itself of the negative reputation and gain more customers as a result.
Overall this is a necessary step and I am happy that Apple finally found the courage to do it.
Well said. However, given Apple’s harsh stance against obsolete tech and software, (removing 32bit included), I seriously doubt Apple will ever fully migrate all features (AppleScript support for example) available in iTunes to their separated apps anytime soon, or ever.
I personally neither hate nor like iTunes. It is a tool that serves its purpose of managing my music library and iOS devices. I have tried Catalina, and it damaged my iOS device music library that is synced from iTunes. I know it is beta 1 but it could also be the sign of Apple aggressively pushing users out of media ownership.
Another fun fact is Apple uses three banners to promote Apple Music. I haven’t seen this before, but I can safely assume They have decided DRM protected limited Apple music Library is the way to go.
And in Books you cannot transfer to your devices by drag and drop. Do you want to transfer 1 book? Well you just need to sync your whole damn library (in my case 5404 books). No manual transfer possible. I wonder if the people who design and code ever use the apps they create.
[doublepost=1559802654][/doublepost]
This first beta does not allow choosing a library other than the one in your music folder. Probably a bug, but for the moment external drives are out as an option.
You can stream your own music or movies to your Apple TV, but you cannot manually transfer movies to iOS devices.
Oh, alright then. I will just give it a social pass and move on. Thanks for explanation.
[doublepost=1559783486][/doublepost]
It moves all your books and potentially audiobooks to its own container, which I hate (seriously, no space for those type of things in my Mac). For music and video, as of now, they do not move anything.
*sigh* If audiobooks are handled the same as ebooks, I think I'll skip upgrading. My iTunes library is on external drive, and I have a large amount of non-iTMS audiobooks on there, there is no way they'll fit on the internal SSD. Not to mention that Books on a Mac doesn't allow the editing of metadata ( I'm presuming this is still the case, my bug opened against the very first Mac version is still open ).
We May need to wait at least 3 betas before knowing how those things work. As of now, there seems to be no clear indication of How external library can be done.