- Jul 3, 2011
Not sure why this is news. It would be shocking if Apple and its board didn't have a plan of some sort.
Exactly, kilcher.Not sure why this is news. It would be shocking if Apple and its board didn't have a plan of some sort.
Yeah... seems unlikely unless SJ wants to step down for health reasons. Why would the board look to replace the guy that has clearly made Apple what it is today.... and the board members massively rich? Makes no sense.Amazing how this news comes out only 30 minutes before the quarterly earnings call. Well done, competitors...
Agree.Not sure why this is news. It would be shocking if Apple and its board didn't have a plan of some sort.
Which doesn't mean he can be CEO in name only for another decade either. It is the job of the board to be the main corporate governing body of the organization and answer to stockholders. They have obviously deemed it in the company's best interests to keep the current management structure intact with Jobs having more leeway than would another chief executive at any any other company, but that's not going to last forever.We've heard this before.
He could just as well continue in the land of the living for another decade.
besides getting stock.. he only makes $1 from Apple... a YEAR
Job's "compensation" is only $1, no?
I'd still be ok with it.which is less than $1 ?