I think the Thunderbolt display was just a descendant of a time when Apple felt vulnerable and defensive. They felt like they had to create the entire widget; in order to provide the consumer with an option if third party hardware vendors never provided support with their own displays. Also, it was a different time when the Cinema display came out in 1999. Nobody was doing that. Today, its common to find hi-res third party displays that are compatible with Macs and are cheaper. It was likely a head ache for the company to produce and a sigh of relief when they could use a third party solution. The only thing you really were paying for was the brand name and the design language.
This is another sign of the companies direction where pro vs consumer is concerned. Apple is obviously targeting a prosumer who uses a variety of tools. At the end of the day, a DELL or Sharp 5K display is likely no different than a Apple branded 5K branded display would be connected to a MacBook Pro or Mac Mini. Also, wasn't LG the manufacturer of the Thunderbolt display? I think Apple is being strategic and focused on where they can offer unique value. Some of it might also be strategic in terms of upsell to products like the 5k iMac or MacBook Pro Retina with a third party display.
The reality is, creating the entire widget is no longer essential to survival. The company no longer needed to pour resources in a Final Cut Studio or Aperture because Adobe is obviously committed to the Mac with Adobe CC and Lightroom. When Adobe demos new versions of Photoshop or Premier, they do it on a Mac. The interoperability with Macs and third party hardware such as keyboards, mouse, displays and other hardware is exceptional these days.
So, this is all about being focused, strategic and offering unique value to a general audience. I predict we are likely seeing the last of both the Mac Pro and the Mac Mini. I still cross fingers the Mac Mini might still be part of the companies push to the consumer crowd, but I believe company wants to stay in the higher margin segment.
This is another sign of the companies direction where pro vs consumer is concerned. Apple is obviously targeting a prosumer who uses a variety of tools. At the end of the day, a DELL or Sharp 5K display is likely no different than a Apple branded 5K branded display would be connected to a MacBook Pro or Mac Mini. Also, wasn't LG the manufacturer of the Thunderbolt display? I think Apple is being strategic and focused on where they can offer unique value. Some of it might also be strategic in terms of upsell to products like the 5k iMac or MacBook Pro Retina with a third party display.
The reality is, creating the entire widget is no longer essential to survival. The company no longer needed to pour resources in a Final Cut Studio or Aperture because Adobe is obviously committed to the Mac with Adobe CC and Lightroom. When Adobe demos new versions of Photoshop or Premier, they do it on a Mac. The interoperability with Macs and third party hardware such as keyboards, mouse, displays and other hardware is exceptional these days.
So, this is all about being focused, strategic and offering unique value to a general audience. I predict we are likely seeing the last of both the Mac Pro and the Mac Mini. I still cross fingers the Mac Mini might still be part of the companies push to the consumer crowd, but I believe company wants to stay in the higher margin segment.