Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
The real question is which websites was the US govmnt using to exploit this vulnerability to access American citizens iPhone devices.
If you look at the past with PRISM, MS allowed govmnt access to our data so Bing and OneDrive, Probably Google since they pretend to do no evil.
 
Right, or don’t do business in China? Nice way in an attempt to get a dig in with an off topic comment. :)
Not totally off because it has something to do with security, privacy, China and the double standard Apple has on these matter :p maybe a little off.. Just a little :) but see you have nothing to say about it :) no come back from those i guess :)
 
Not totally off because it has something to do with security, privacy, China and the double standard Apple has on these matter :p maybe a little off.. Just a little :) but see you have nothing to say about it :) no come back from those i guess :)
Only a double standard in some people's mind :)as some would want Apple not to do business in China.:) However, the difference is it's pretty open the business arrangement:) :pas opposed to an unknown number of websites (1 to infinity) infecting an unknown number of iphones (1 to infinity):)

That's a much different conversation than this thread is about.:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
If they genuinely disagreed with Google's claims they'd lawyer up
Google’s claims aren’t factually wrong, they just went out of their way to make things sound way worse. That may not rise to the level of a legal contest.

I could say that 100% of iPhones in use today can be the victim of an exploit thst exposes sensitive information on your phone. It involves the cellular modem and both the speaker and microphone. And, that Apple won’t fix it because IT IS UNPATCHABLE! Which is factually accurate. However, the exploit is “someone calling you and asking you to give them your sensitive info”. :) If they’re successful (and this DOES happen, likely thousands of times a day) then your info is compromised. It’s not a lie, it’s just a creative representation of the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG and I7guy
All of you had to swallow your pride when these exploits came to light as your preferred mobile OS is not the security king you thought it was, but Apple comes defending themselves all while diminishing the findings (and bashing security researchers, who are people really working for us, not them) and all of the sudden you criticize Project Zero for doing their job? Why dont you bash others when they publish Android security exploits, including Project Zero? Oh wait, Android is known for that (in your minds) so it's OK, BUT my dear shiny almighty iOS is not, so screw Google's Project Zero because they must be lying, oh and Apple told us it "only" affected a small group, so #fakenews... Hypocrisy at its finest.

Apple didnt even credit the researchers and this is going to cost them in the long run. Their arrogant PR move wont help them long run. Next time will be other researchers and they wont be as kind waiting for Apple to patch the bugs before the exploits get published on the wild. They know they will be bashed anyway, right?
 
So Google tracking people... that's a feature.

OMG iOS is tracking people, buy Android instead!!!
 
And there is the key statement. In short, Project Zero just made themselves look useless.
Except that it was the Threat Analysis Group who contacted Apple some days prior to Project Zero going to them with the details of the exploits discovered by Google TAG. By February 1st when Project Zero approached Appel with details of how the exploits were accomplished Apple was almost certain to have been acting on the Google TAG report from a few days prior. Apparently three days prior based on Apple's comment of taking 10 days to patch after having been advised.

If you haven't yet read the Ars article regarding Apple's response you should:
https://arstechnica.com/information...ing-ios-security-bombshell-dropped-by-google/
[doublepost=1567882665][/doublepost]
Go to the security websites. Long before this post their analysis agrees with Apple’s storyline. Google only stumbled upon this exploit chain because they were investigating simpler chains used to exploit Android emanating from the same sites (China is using these hacks to monitor Uirgyr Muslims, because of costs many more of them obviously use Android smartphones), many of which are still effectively unpatched because Google doesn’t have a chain to fix them to most of the Android world or involve exploits (apps) outside Googles control.

It is important to note that Google may not have intended the news agencies to pick this story up in the way it did. Let’s not get ascribe maliciousness on something essentially meant as a retrospective to inform the security industry (while avoiding implicating the state actor behind it, the Chinese government) that got really out of hand.
I suggest you haven't actually read what independent security researchers are reporting.

Only one of the 11 identified sites may have tried to target Android as well, but using an exploit that was closed by Google in 2017 with the Chrome v.60 update.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
They aren’t exactly facts either. Google’s original post had an implication that the attackers did exploit millions of users; this is incorrect going by Apple’s response.

I don’t think Apple’s response was defensive per-say, but more so to let general users know that they haven’t been exploited.

I just hope that the users who were effected have been notified about potential data exposure.

Google hasn’t been exactly honest here with their use of hyperbole.

You can't sue for libel if it is the truth. I suspect that is why apple is not suing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Omg. Libel is based on defamation, not overly broad statements. Although one doesn't need anything but $250 to file a lawsuit.

The project zero report said apple is bad at security, that using standard quality assurance processes apple should have caught the exploits. That looks like google is trying to hurt apples reputation. But it is the truth.
 
No, it’s about a zero day vulnerability that goes away on reboot. (To be precise)
Seriously? Zero day vulnerability is used to take full control over your phone until you reboot it (for months?). Are you trying to say that it's not a big deal?
[doublepost=1567886768][/doublepost]Project Zero reported more than 200 issues to Apple. Instead of expressing their gratitude Apple is trying to say that this particular incident was not a big deal because the attackers decided to target just a repressed minority. And Apple made sure not to mention the role of China government in this. Money always comes first, privacy and security of the customers is Apple's first priority only in TV commercials.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rafark
The project zero report said apple is bad at security, that using standard quality assurance processes apple should have caught the exploits. That looks like google is trying to hurt apples reputation. But it is the truth.
It’s the truth for you based on your preconceived notions or bias. Criticism is not defamation. And criticism as we’ve seen doesn’t need to be true to be said or written.

Seriously? Zero day vulnerability is used to take full control over your phone until you reboot it (for months?). Are you trying to say that it's not a big deal?
Zero day vulnerabilities are always a big deal (Microsoft and android know this all to well), however not being persistent reduces the impact, even though this seemingly went undetected for a period of time. You don’t know how often or not phones are rebooted. (Mine gets rebooted daily as do my computers) Zero day vulnerabilities unfortunately exist on every platform. It’s a cat and mouse game.
 
Last edited:
It’s the truth for you based on your preconceived notions or bias. Criticism is not defamation. And criticism as we’ve seen doesn’t need to be true to be said or written.


Zero day vulnerabilities are always a big deal (Microsoft and android know this all to well), however not being persistent reduces the impact, even though this seemingly went undetected for a period of time. You don’t know how often or not phones are rebooted. (Mine gets rebooted daily as do my computers) Zero day vulnerabilities unfortunately exist on every platform. It’s a cat and mouse game.
I have Samsung Galaxy Note 9. I reboot it about every monts (and only because it begs me for it). I have a high confidence in my phone.
 
That may be a misplaced confidence. But to each their own.
Sure. And I understand why iPhone owners would reboot daily but I never heard of the malware that was able to take control over Android phone when someone just visited a website so why would I inconvenience myself? I pay premium dollar for a premium phone. I should not have to reboot it daily, that would be just ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfacts
Sure. And I understand why iPhone owners would reboot daily but I never heard of the malware that was able to take control over Android phone when someone just visited a website so why would I inconvenience myself? I pay premium dollar for a premium phone. I should not have to reboot it daily, that would be just ridiculous.
The very definition of a zero day vulnerability is what you’ve never heard of? Are you claiming android has or has never had no zero day vulnerabilities?

i understand the misplaced confidence android has in google, but let’s open our eyes. Or keep them shut and pretend they don’t exist. One doesn’t know what they don’t know.
 
The very definition of a zero day vulnerability is what you’ve never heard of? Are you claiming android has or has never had no zero day vulnerabilities?

i understand the misplaced confidence android has in google, but let’s open our eyes. Or keep them shut and pretend they don’t exist. One doesn’t know what they don’t know.
Zero day vulnerability does not mean the web site can take control. In fact, in this case the attackers used five different vulnerabilities (yes, that's how many iOS had) to take full control. In most cases, one would need to install malware on the phone for it to exploit zero day vulnerability and the degree of compromise depends on the type of vulnerability.
 
You can't sue for libel if it is the truth. I suspect that is why apple is not suing.

So if you say something untrue about me and I choose not to sue, it has to be because what you said is true?

That’s the part of your logic I can’t reconcile. People say tons of untrue stuff about Apple every single day. I don’t see Apple hurling lawsuits at every single one of them.

Whether Apple elects to sue Google has nothing to do with the discussion at hand. And I don't see anything wrong with Apple's response from a pure content standpoint - it was rebutting the things that Apple felt were inaccurate (and inflammatory) in Google's reporting.

Don’t even get me started about a security group revealing flaws in a product for which their employer is the primary competitor. Billions of dollars are at stake in public perception of these competing platforms. To pretend otherwise, to ignore this reality, is dangerous.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
Zero day vulnerability does not mean the web site can take control. In fact, in this case the attackers used five different vulnerabilities (yes, that's how many iOS had) to take full control. In most cases, one would need to install malware on the phone for it to exploit zero day vulnerability and the degree of compromise depends on the type of vulnerability.
While this particular episode is about iOS, android has had its share also. Should we dig them up and compare notes?
 
While this particular episode is about iOS, android has had its share also. Should we dig them up and compare notes?

Part of me wonders if Google uses Project Zero, at least in part, as a smoke screen to divert attention from their own unenviable security situation. We know of Google's own security problems with both Android and their Play Store - problems that hit the computer security news weekly. Are Technica alone can probably provide dozens of examples from just 2019. In contrast, Apple's security record from a news perspective is profoundly enviable, and I do understand if Google is anxious to take Apple down a peg or two just so it doesn't seem so bad in comparison.

Second, the usual Apple-bashing, be it deserved or undeserved, is practically a cultural phenomenon at this point, especially when you know the competition and opinion journalists have a tendency to exaggerate the scale of the actual issue. I guess this is a package deal when you are an Apple product user.

Third, while I understand people expecting or desiring a different sort of response from Apple, I actually appreciate what Apple has provided here. The omission of any detail about compromised websites by Google was (IMO) unnecessary, and left me as an iOS user wanting more info (i.e. was my device exploited visiting tech blog x?). As someone living in Singapore, while the Uighur situation is obviously horrendous, Google's report did nothing to answer any burning questions I might have, and simply served to generate more alarm than it otherwise should have.

In this regard, Apple's response actually provided a lot more context. I now know that this wasn’t randomly hitting thousands of users all over the world (thus increasing chance of detection), but thousands of very specific users in a very specific bit of the world.

Knowing the compromised sites were also going after Android and Windows devices (albeit with less exotic exploits) is also useful additional info, I think (but the critics will likely say that I am deflecting).

I don't understand the criticism levelled at Apple in this regard. It is not the business of Apple's software security team to condemn the unpleasant surveillance regimes of governments. If anything, Apple has gone one step further by pointing the finger directly at the Chinese, something I don't believe anyone else has done. Not even Google, whom in theory should have been able to take the high road here because it doesn't have any business ties with China.

I suppose one could argue that Apple kinda brought it on themselves, by allowing themselves to become too addicted to China's inexpensive and competent labour chain, which in turn gives Apple a strong incentive to turn a blind eye towards China's criminal behaviour, both locally and internationally. For Apple's sake, I hope that they take their manufacturing out of China sooner than later.

@macfacts Now that I have had some time to think this through, I retract my earlier statement about Google lying. While Google technically did tell the truth, what they have done here is even more disingenuous and dishonest than if they had just flat-out lied, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG and I7guy
“Don’t be evil...” unless it’s an opportunity to trash your strongest competitor, then go head and lie, fabricate stuff, misstate and exaggerate.

Google exposing security issues the way they did is doing the Apple community a solid.

Apple’s response is pretty affirming of how bad iOS security is. I imagine macOS is even worse.
 
Google exposing security issues the way they did is doing the Apple community a solid.

Apple’s response is pretty affirming of how bad iOS security is. I imagine macOS is even worse.

There is no excuse for Google failing to mention the fact that this hack was from a nation state actor and that it was narrowly targeted at China's Muslim ethnic minority.

Toss in the fact that they also left out the fact that Android had also been targeted, and there really is just no excuse whatsoever.

I maintain that the manner in which google went about their disclosure has brought more harm to the Apple community (in the form of needless hysteria and fear, but I guess the media needs to share in the blame as well) than it has helped.

The only two motivations I can see are Google wanting to harm a competitor, or them being worried about their ability to get back into China.

Neither is a good look.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.