Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Never believe anything written in Forbes!
*written anywhere without verifying sources
Tell me, did you read the article before posting this?

By spreading more misinformation? Forbes is a well known anti-environmental neo-con publication.

Same question.

I happily admit that I don't make a habit of reading Forbes, but this article is nonetheless an excellent, well informed counterpoint to the media narrative.
 
It was more to make a point than to be 100% accurate on the salary.
I didn’t say you weren’t accurate on the salary; I have no idea what Mr. Apple’s salary is.

But your point would have been made more powerfully had you said, “A million dollars? That’s less than 0.0004% of Apple’s yearly revenue!”. You still could’ve worked your “Tim Apple” in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theapplehead
I am brazillian. Please do not donate any money for this government. The federal prosecutors, warned the govt 4 days before the fire began. They did nothing, because their voters were behind it. What Brazil need is sanctions on its agricultural products. That will hurt the government base and it will render better results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hagar and abunawas
if you don't plan to tell people how much you donate... then why even post it then??

is getting recognition online more important than the act itself?
Why do you need to know how much somebody donated? Giving out a figure allows people to criticize and say Apple should give more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidec
Um money isn’t going to bring those trees back.

But perhaps it can replace them?
iu-19.jpeg
 
Only $1 million? That’s like one week of pay for Tim Apple.

Why compare a million dollars with Tim Apple’s salary? Having increased the company’s value by some half a trillion dollars, Mr. Apple is worth every penny!

Anyway, you’ve missed a real opportunity here. Apple’s revenues are hundreds of billions of dollars per year. Try again?
It's a million more than nothing.
 
"The fires are of growing concern as the rainforest in the area generates approximately 20 percent of the world's oxygen, and it is also known for housing 10 percent of the world's known biodiversity."

The forest produces 20% of the world's oxygen but it also consumes 20% of the world's oxygen.
The world's lungs are the oceans, not a rainforest.

What?! Dude, plants grow by taking carbon dioxide from the air, and water, converting it to carbon and hydrocarbons (the growing plant) and oxygen (released back into the air). The using of carbon dioxide and releasing of oxygen is why forests are called the lungs of the world, and why the air smells so fresh in a forest. When plants burn, the carbon and hydrocarbons (that are the plant) combines with oxygen in the air and produces carbon dioxide and water vapour.

Animals and humans, on the other hand, breathe in air and use the oxygen in it to oxygenate the blood. Thus why if you're stuck in a small room with closed windows and doors for a while, the air becomes stuffy from al the oxygen being depleted. One easy way to sleep better - have indoor plants in your bedroom.

So if the world is covered in forests, then there is a lot of oxygen and fresh air. If we burn down the forests to use for grazing lands, then there will be a lot less oxygen, and a lot more carbon dioxide in the air, which is a greenhouse gas, which will contribute to global warming.

The science of this is simple, well known, and well beyond doubt. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of issues, such as: there are a handful of billionaires making good profits from fossil fuels and from replacing rainforests with grazing lands, and they are making hay while the sun shines, and to prolong it, are filling the world with misinformation so that the common man is confused about if global warming is real or not; also no-one really knows quite how bad the consequences will be, because the world has never experienced man-made global warming before, so the modelling is difficult; and also with the fact that the change is gradual, so it doesn't feel quite real, even though year after year there are more record hot temperatures being broken; and also the fact that right aligned people are more about personal responsibility, and left aligned people are more about collective responsibility, and because global warming requires collective responsibility more than personal responsibility to fix it, the left are the first to want to act, and this makes a lot of people on the right see the problem as a politically motivated lefty thing rather than a real problem; and thus, all that combined, the result is a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. The big problem with this is, global warming is likely to accelerate and be beyond the point of repair by the time there is enough people wanting to fix it.
 
Apple has a responsibility to all of their STAKEholders not just their shareholders as do all businesses. They need to keep their ear to the ground and be aware and proactive about the world around them as they do business in all these countries.

As a share holder I am confused as to what constitutes a stakeholder?
 
The rainforest does not generate any net oxygen. That is a common myth that most news sources would check before repeating. The animals that live there and the natural decay of plants consumes all of the oxygen produced.

BTW, I’m a democrat. Não somos nós que sejam educados? Pô

Yes, but it is more about the forest being a storage system. Burn down the forest and the carbon is released as carbon dioxide (greenhouse gas), and the oxygen is burnt up. Grow a forest, and carbon gets taken from carbon dioxide in the air and turned into plant matter, and oxygen gets released. Burn down all the worlds forests and turn them into grazing land, and we have a big big big problem.

Now sure, if a forest burns down and then regrows, you are right, it's not that big a deal (as long as it is not such a huge burn off that the ecosystem there changes enough that it doesn't regrow the same. Or such a big burn off that the topsoil all washes away and it similarly doesn't regrow). And here's part of the problem, the Amazon rainforest has a fragile thin topsoil layer.
 
What?! Dude, plants grow by taking carbon dioxide from the air, and water, converting it to carbon and hydrocarbons (the growing plant) and oxygen (released back into the air). The using of carbon dioxide and releasing of oxygen is why forests are called the lungs of the world, and why the air smells so fresh in a forest. When plants burn, the carbon and hydrocarbons (that are the plant) combines with oxygen in the air and produces carbon dioxide and water vapour.

Animals and humans, on the other hand, breathe in air and use the oxygen in it to oxygenate the blood. Thus why if you're stuck in a small room with closed windows and doors for a while, the air becomes stuffy from al the oxygen being depleted. One easy way to sleep better - have indoor plants in your bedroom.

So if the world is covered in forests, then there is a lot of oxygen and fresh air. If we burn down the forests to use for grazing lands, then there will be a lot less oxygen, and a lot more carbon dioxide in the air, which is a greenhouse gas, which will contribute to global warming.

The science of this is simple, well known, and well beyond doubt. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of issues, such as: there are a handful of billionaires making good profits from fossil fuels and from replacing rainforests with grazing lands, and they are making hay while the sun shines, and to prolong it, are filling the world with misinformation so that the common man is confused about if global warming is real or not; also no-one really knows quite how bad the consequences will be, because the world has never experienced man-made global warming before, so the modelling is difficult; and also with the fact that the change is gradual, so it doesn't feel quite real, even though year after year there are more record hot temperatures being broken; and also the fact that right aligned people are more about personal responsibility, and left aligned people are more about collective responsibility, and because global warming requires collective responsibility more than personal responsibility to fix it, the left are the first to want to act, and this makes a lot of people on the right see the problem as a politically motivated lefty thing rather than a real problem; and thus, all that combined, the result is a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. The big problem with this is, global warming is likely to accelerate and be beyond the point of repair by the time there is enough people wanting to fix it.
Climate change is junk science
 
This isn't a bad thing but the reality, as reported by the NYT, is that the vast majority of the burning is of already cleared fields not the destruction of rainforests. Apparently burning fields before the new crop season is a yearly thing and there is no indication that this year is any worse than normal.
Another baseless climate scare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tgara and Huck
Earth is 4.54 billion years old, with an error range of 50 million years.:rolleyes:

How many data points are we looking at to make conclusions? :cool:

Present charts conveying a "green movement"............. Science not political agenda (religion).:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck
People seem to forget (or don't know) that the Amazon is always on fire. Granted, it's worse this year than most, but this isn't that unusual. Doesn't make it right or a good thing, but social media uproar is always interesting...
 
Maybe Tim Cook the political correct man who wants to stop allowing people to have freedom of speech, he is becoming such a leftie

In Europe we call them "radical chic", they are the worse kind of hipocritical people (and worst kind of lefties). They pretend to care about people and their rights, (but only civil rights that cost nothing, not social rights that instead are expensive to support) yet they care only about profits and to please their masters. They pontificate about ecology, yet they pressure people to buy millions of new disposable device every year.
They say they care about jobs but they use foreign handforce payed with peanuts.
But worse of all, they talk! they talk all the time, on tv, on newspapers, on media prizing themselves and they do it only if they can talks on stage where people can only listen or with sweet journalists who read questions written by them in advance.
I hate those people not because they do their job but because they pretend to do other jobs that is not their responsability. Tim, you are a good CEO, maybe the best in the world. But your job is not to teach to us, is not be our politician or our mentor. If you do that you just look like a clown because there is a huge interest conflit. If some day you completely leave business I will be the first to listen you speaches about ecology, society etc... but not now, you are credible like an escort who talks about the value of virginity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve333
Okay so it's like some company calling their ditch diggers on the night shift associates. Let's not get carried away by some corporate manifesto. Apple is a company that got sued for not paying it's employees the time it took to search their bags on the way out.
Whatever it is seems like Apple signed on to it. Whether or not it actually means anything, like many things in life, is a somewhat different story.
[doublepost=1566877916][/doublepost]
Climate change is junk science
As in it doesn’t exist?
 
Climate change can be a hoax, maybe not. Until we know more, does it really, really hurt to try and minimize resources used in the meantime? Maybe it will save the world, maybe it makes no difference. I know that I want to be able to say that I at least tried.

No one has to go live in a cave, but use air transport as little as possible, when buying a new car, pick one with less consumption, really consider if using a plastic bag, straw or any other plastic product is necessary, look for ecologically grown products, buy more local produce, check out some new plant based meat.

I know a lot of people will argue that this will make no difference and is just leftist propaganda. Perhaps, but no one can argue against pollution, because all it takes is opening your eyes and look outside. Crap everywhere. If you do nothing else, use less plastic!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ETN3
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.