We need a new CEO, a CEO not to please shareholders, but an engineer, someone who can innovate!
It’s all about the troll…Why people keep saying this is beyond me. Nothing is further from the truth. Matter of fact, it's quite the opposite. There's much more to AI than Siri / generative AI. A lot of the R&D that went into the car project was AI-related and now that can be used across Apple's entire product lineup.
Who? And you want an engineer to be in charge of the most valuable company in the world? 😂😂😂We need a new CEO, a CEO not to please shareholders, but an engineer, someone who can innovate!
We need a new CEO, a CEO not to please shareholders, but an engineer, someone who can innovate!
You pretend to know the extent of Apple's progress on AI in the car project but you have no idea. The project as a whole obviously was a failure. And since we know that the project's focus was on self driving (AI), it sounds like their AI efforts were a failure.Why people keep saying this is beyond me. Nothing is further from the truth. Matter of fact, it's quite the opposite. There's much more to AI than Siri / generative AI. A lot of the R&D that went into the car project was AI-related and now that can be used across Apple's entire product lineup.
Hang on a second. You said someone else has no idea, but clearly you are in the exact some boat. Is that hypocrisy?You pretend to know the extent of Apple's progress on AI in the car project but you have no idea. The project as a whole obviously was a failure. And since we know that the project's focus was on self driving (AI), it sounds like their AI efforts were a failure.
What, like how Macs top out at 196 GB of ram, and they used to top out at 1.5 GB? How many people actually bought Macs with that much ram?So what is Apple actually working on now? I'm genuinely wondering what is within their competency zone at this point. Can't (or won't) build professional-level hardware
Yeah, their software offerings could be better.(software too, depending on what you think about their current offerings),
I have a Pixel 8 Pro with "AI" photo and search features. I tried them out. It was fun to play around with the AI features for a short while, but they are not something I get value out of outside of the novelty factor.giving up on AI,
Can anyone?giving up on the car (admittedly an ambitious project but one that had massive resources sunk into it), can't build a multi-zone wireless charger apparently,
It's a device most people configure once and then hide it out of sight, never thinking about it again. There isn't much unique for them to do with it.no more routers,
The model of Sony headphones I have have been in production for a third of a century. Headphones really don't need to be updated all that often. Moving to USB-C would be nice, of course.no more music players, operating systems filled with bugs and glitches, AirPod Max going years without so much as a color change,
"Hyper-bloated"?can't make up their minds on what they want the HomePod to be seemingly, hyper-bloated product lines that no one can keep in their head anymore,
Their hardware lineup is just about the best it's ever been, with no major weaknesses. I mean, there are a few small things where they are penny-pinching, like their Macs starting with 8GB of ram, or only having 60 Hz on their base iPhone model.and product design that seems to be going downhill by the year - what the hell is going on over there? The last embers of Steve's creative genius are, I think, finally out. It took over a decade but it's clear Apple is no longer the company he left behind. And he's not coming back this time to save it for a third time...
I have a brilliant idea. Let's put Craig Federighi in charge and make him the new CEO. 😊Who? And you want an engineer to be in charge of the most valuable company in the world? 😂😂😂
Yeah he was mentioned before. He would be the logical choice, but he doesn’t really do logistics, worldwide marketing. I’d like to see him be as Chief Operating Officer first to prove his ability. that way he could be in charge of new products for a while.I have a brilliant idea. Let's put Craig Federighi in charge and make him the new CEO. 😊
He has the history not only with Apple, but with NeXT. He has the engineering part. He has the charisma. He knows & understands the software. And he's not as opaque as Cook, he know to relate and communicate better. There.
Seriously now, for some time now, I keep seeing him as a great potential succesor to Tim.
Can't build AirPower, can't build a car, can't build MicroLED. What is going on with this company?
What, like how Macs top out at 196 GB of ram, and they used to top out at 1.5 GB? How many people actually bought Macs with that much ram?
Yeah, their software offerings could be better.
I have a Pixel 8 Pro with "AI" photo and search features. I tried them out. It was fun to play around with the AI features for a short while, but they are not something I get value out of outside of the novelty factor.
Can anyone?
It's a device most people configure once and then hide it out of sight, never thinking about it again. There isn't much unique for them to do with it.
The model of Sony headphones I have have been in production for a third of a century. Headphones really don't need to be updated all that often. Moving to USB-C would be nice, of course.
"Hyper-bloated"?
I have to get a new work PC soon. Although a Mac could technically be used, I've built most of my workflow on Windows.
Anyway, I checked out the Dell and HP websites to see what their desktop offerings were, and their websites are a mess. Dell has five desktop tower lines, and when you click on one of the categories, it shows you a few dozen configurations, in seemingly random order, with older and new models mixed together and higher and lower priced models mixed together.
I could only wish that shopping for a PC was as easy as shopping for a Mac. Apple's lineup may not be the smallest it's ever been, but it's not bad.
Their hardware lineup is just about the best it's ever been, with no major weaknesses. I mean, there are a few small things where they are penny-pinching, like their Macs starting with 8GB of ram, or only having 60 Hz on their base iPhone model.
But they've transitioned to everything being Apple Silicon, all Retina displays, and almost everything has moved to USB-C. Lightning will probably be all but dead by the end of next year
I think one of their weakest points is the lack of OLED on iPads, and that will be fixed very soon.
I note you said Charisma. Very true, but I’m not sure that’s a qualification for the job, but it would probably appease many Apple fans…. Until something difficult happens and he fails. Do you think he could parley with world and business leaders or would he struggle? I don’t know the answer, but he’d need to shadow Cook for a few years first.
If rumors are true, though, part of the project was a huge CPU--something like 4 x Ultra--that might one day find itself in a Mac Pro...You pretend to know the extent of Apple's progress on AI in the car project but you have no idea. The project as a whole obviously was a failure. And since we know that the project's focus was on self driving (AI), it sounds like their AI efforts were a failure.
Tim Cook is an Industrial Engineering graduate from Auburn. Do you get it, yet? That's already covered.We need a new CEO, a CEO not to please shareholders, but an engineer, someone who can innovate!
This is interesting. But I don't see this happening under Federighi's watch. This will require a new SVP of Software Engineering that believes in this as much as you do. I just think Apple's too far down the Swift / Swift UI rabbit hole to reverse course.Update the Cocoa AppKit and the rest with all the features that people are used to in C++ and some features, if possible, from the likes of Rust.
ObjC has 35+ years of rock solid frameworks. Swift is a moving target that is constantly producing bugs. Engineering has been rolling it in and out and let's just leave it as a research project. Add support for Swift's notation to allow existing programmers starting on Swift to learn ObjC 3.0. Extend the MVC frameworks to include features missing compared to Swift that will enhance not just be added to check off a bucket list.
There are dozens of projects dating back decades that they spent lots of resources on. We've only heard about some of these higher profile ones (which no one else has nailed either BTW). Little has changed at Apple except maybe they are more focused and wiser now. Crazy is fun to watch but no one wants to live with crazy.Apple is slowly becoming a nightmare. The Apple that once was, no longer exists.
I'm 100% convinced that every product Apple releases from this point, will be trash.
Sadly that's not the reality of things in 2024, maybe it was like that in the era of Steve jobs, which death was *checks notes*, almost 12 years? Time fliesWe need a new CEO, a CEO not to please shareholders, but an engineer, someone who can innovate!
good. I'd rather apple get back to basics and fix all the bugs first. the Apple Watch barely works
Which is the best selling watch in the world.
Sadly that's not the reality of things in 2024, maybe it was like that in the era of Steve jobs, which death was *checks notes*, almost 12 years? Time flies
It’s all about the troll…
Who? And you want an engineer to be in charge of the most valuable company in the world? 😂😂😂
Can you give us an example of a company who is currently innovating to the level you expect?
Yeah he was mentioned before. He would be the logical choice, but he doesn’t really do logistics, worldwide marketing. I’d like to see him be as Chief Operating Officer first to prove his ability. that way he could be in charge of new products for a while.
What’s up with Apple lately?
Apple ends Apple Car R&D, Apple ends 5G Modem R&D and now this? Not cutting edge anymore?