Yes he doesn’t have a good track record picking his successor, too bad he is not alive to fix his second mistake.This was actually Jobs' second mistake. The first was when he recruited a cola salesman to run the company.
Yes he doesn’t have a good track record picking his successor, too bad he is not alive to fix his second mistake.This was actually Jobs' second mistake. The first was when he recruited a cola salesman to run the company.
They already do that (your iphone is a Samsung screen designed by apple, and apple silicon is manufactured by TSMC)Just because Apple won’t be making MicroLED displays doesn’t mean future Apple products won’t have them. It just means they’ll be ordering them from a supplier instead of making them inhouse. Let’s not pretend there would be this huge cost savings they’d pass onto the consumers if Apple made them in-house or this huge technology leap. These are displays after all. If Apple doesn’t make them and they are economically viable then somebody else will. Any savings Apple might encounter as a result would go right into the C level executives and shareholders pockets. Consumers themselves might see a buck or two come off of the price if anything at all. Big whoop….
I’d rather have them putting R&D money into AI and reducing the size of the tech that goes inside the Vision Pro so 10 years from now they look like AR glasses you can buy today but with visionOS doing it’s thing from the perspective of the person who is wearing it while looking mostly like regular glasses / sun glasses to others.
They are spending their money on lawyers.Can't build AirPower, can't build a car, can't build MicroLED. What is going on with this company?
Vision no.Vision Pro?
I have never looked at any of my watches, from Series 0 through 8 and ever thought the display was anything but great. Why waste resources on this project?
Can't build AirPower, can't build a car, can't build MicroLED. What is going on with this company?
Personally, I think the AVP was a mistake but it does effectively counter the narrative that Apple, and Tim Cook specifically, are averse to taking market risks and innovating.Seems like Apple is more into cost cutting and margins nowadays. Soon Apple products will just look like everything else for double the price. Shame.
Personally, I think the AVP was a mistake but it does effectively counter the narrative that Apple, and Tim Cook specifically, are averse to taking market risks and innovating.
Within Apple's ecosystem. New OS and new product line not doing it for you? It's as much an innovation as the Apple Watch was. But that's just a semantics discussion.Not really sure what the "innovation" is with AVP
It's got marginally better specs than existing entrenched HMDs -- that's basically it
I guess the finger pinching/wave your hands around to do things?
meh..
It's as much an innovation as the Apple Watch was.
One of the largest drain on the battery is the display. MicroLED is supposed to be more efficient than OLED. A microLED screen would give more battery life on a watch. Beyond that, microLED is not prone to burn-in and can likely be brighter than OLED. Ultimately microLEDs would probably have longer lifetimes than OLED.I have never looked at any of my watches, from Series 0 through 8 and ever thought the display was anything but great. Why waste resources on this project?
I agree with you, not because of recent cancellations, but because of what wasn’t cancelled, or cancelled soon enough.Fire Tim Crook! He clearly isn't fit to lead any more
Actually not entirely, but using it with Fitness+ Training, did a lot more than my previous HR monitors.I no longer live anywhere near a decent Gym and I get a great cardio workout every day.You waited till Apple Watch to loose weight? There has been countless watches before Apple Watch whose sole purpose was to aid you in fitness and healthy life.
Modems are a complex mix of digital processing with analog signals. Getting that right for all of the various frequencies and modulations can be tricky. Doing that without tripping over the minefield of Qualcomm patents is clearly nearly impossible. It would not be surprising if Apple decided to not build one but just to use it as a bargaining chip with Qualcomm.What I don't understand is that they've clearly hit making their own silicone out of the park and yet somehow modems present an insurmountable challenge?
They can obviously do it but choose not to because the economic reward isn't there.
The question is just if they are instead refocusing on other moonshot projects or if we are seeing a shift in strategy where they are backing away from approaching full integration to making pretty good, cobbled together products with an Apple logo on them.
Is Tim starting to bow out and thus abandoning long-term strategies?
Which is the best selling watch in the world.Within Apple's ecosystem. New OS and new product line not doing it for you? It's as much an innovation as the Apple Watch was. But that's just a semantics discussion.
The Blue LED was definitely the holy grail of technology. It took $ billions to develop, over 20 years of research and it earned Nakamura a Nobel Prize.Dang. Sad to hear this. I've been patiently waiting for microLED for years. Seems like the holy grail of display technology. If we can fit 19 billion transistors onto an iPhone SoC then I have faith that someone will eventually be able to fit tens of millions of LEDs on consumer displays in a way that is economically viable. At least I hope so...
The iPad OLED rumors never really made sense to me until now. Just didn't add up that they would put all that work into miniLED and then all that R&D into microLED just to transition to... OLED.
What Cook has done is continue with Jobs' legacy of allowing smart people do smart things if they think there maybe value in it. Listening to people like Mark Rober who was left to do his own research to its conclusion. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it doesn’t. But they have to know when to stop.What I don't understand is that they've clearly hit making their own silicone out of the park and yet somehow modems present an insurmountable challenge?
They can obviously do it but choose not to because the economic reward isn't there.
The question is just if they are instead refocusing on other moonshot projects or if we are seeing a shift in strategy where they are backing away from approaching full integration to making pretty good, cobbled together products with an Apple logo on them.
Is Tim starting to bow out and thus abandoning long-term strategies?
Exactly, and the things they learned, they could use to boost Qualcomm. It could be a big win for Apple and definitely a bigger win for Qualcomm if they use some of Apples own patents in their design. Who knows?Modems are a complex mix of digital processing with analog signals. Getting that right for all of the various frequencies and modulations can be tricky. Doing that without tripping over the minefield of Qualcomm patents is clearly nearly impossible. It would not be surprising if Apple decided to not build one but just to use it as a bargaining chip with Qualcomm.
So you want a more boring Apple, not one that pushes the limits and sometimes or even often fails.I agree with you, not because of recent cancellations, but because of what wasn’t cancelled, or cancelled soon enough.
Titan should have been cut after 5 years, not 10, and I would argue even sooner than that because they would have figured out pretty early how hard FSD is (was Siri going to do the driving?).
HomePod is over-engineered and uncompetitive in several ways (price, software and h/w interop).
AVP has no real use case, just vague promises of something coming down the line.
However, I don’t have any issue with making a go at modems and displays, as they learned with processors that more vertical integration was better.
Beancounter CEOCan't build AirPower, can't build a car, can't build MicroLED. What is going on with this company?
So what is Apple actually working on now? I'm genuinely wondering what is within their competency zone at this point.
Why people keep saying this is beyond me. Nothing is further from the truth. Matter of fact, it's quite the opposite. There's much more to AI than Siri / generative AI. A lot of the R&D that went into the car project was AI-related and now that can be used across Apple's entire product lineup.giving up on AI