Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm glad they're streamlining the (very) bloated iPhoto and providing a better integrated solution, but this really shows how Apple is turning it's back on professionals (hell, even prosumers), who were the main reason Apple and OS X gained popularity early on. :(

You hit the nail on the head - Apple was actually a grass roots movement. TekServe anyone? We are the ones who made Apple. Now greedy money men are milking it for all it's worth. It's not Apple anymore, regardless of whether it continues making money or not.
 
Nice language, you're totally not offending anyone.

You are right and I am sorry for saying that, I am really pissed off by these news.

I think what I meant is clear though: in a short time Apple will not be a professional's choice anymore.
 
Told you so.

Apple always does this with Apps. They tell you how great things will be, and then get tired of supporting it sooner or later.

Welcome to the island of "Misfit Toys", Aperture.
 
Oh look, what a surprise. Now they want to move your photos into the cloud where you can only access them with the latest version of the software, which requires the latest OS which requires new hardware.
 
Anyone dumb enough to rely on Apple for professional level software deserves it. We saw what they did to Final Cut, never mind dumbing down the mac version of iWork to match the iPad.

:rolleyes:

I've used it, though I'm not a professional. The UI and organziation of the app is what I liked. True LR has a lot more features. Looks like Adobe just got a new customer (me).

I'm wicked bummed about this. At this point its really the only major app I use on my Mac. Everything else is done on windows
 
There's absolutely no chance they will put the features of Aperture into this new app, far to confusing for the general public.

No less than Final Cut Pro X. Plenty of pro's think that's not anywhere close to being a pro app and suitable mostly for prosumers and wedding videographers.
 
Anyone dumb enough to rely on Apple for professional level software deserves it. We saw what they did to Final Cut, never mind dumbing down the mac version of iWork to match the iPad.

:rolleyes:

That sentiment might have been a bit harsh prior to today, but as of now it's crystal clear that's the case.
 
It's still a perfectly functional application. If you need it, use it.

Sure, but that means there will be no future versions. In 3-4 years when OS X Mountain View no longer can run Aperture what is he supposed to do? If you are going to switch software at some point it will be a lot easier to do it at the beginning when you have no library to convert.

For me I already switched to Lightroom. Managing content across multiple externals is so much easier than Aperture. I like Aperture's interface better, but now that it is being discontinued I am glad I made the switch already.
 
I doubt Apple will put pro features in their standard photo app. They will dumb it down for grandma just like they always do.

Unfortunately I hate lightroom's UI so I'm left with no options. It's back to just Photoshop and bridge I guess, although Adobe's software seems to get less stable with every update.
 
I hope a lot of you people have stopped drinking the kool-aid by now. As a once Apple enthusiast, I really cannot believe how badly Tim Cook has ruined this once great company. New updates are merely tweaks and new products have been nothing more then slight modifications on old hardware (ie. thinner and lighter). Out of all the Apple products that I once owned, the iPhone is the only product I have not gotten ridden of. I think they make one of the best phones available with their firm stance against carrier bloatware and branding, but now even iOS is becoming stale and new features are nothing more then rip-offs of android and popular app functions. Stop drinking the kool-aid people. Even Windows 8 is better (as bad as it once was) then what Apple has creating.
 
No problems, Aperture was rubbish anyway.
One think I love about the UK (Sorry if Scotland seceded, I wasn't paying attention) is the way people say "Rubbish" with such conviction, it's much better than the usual expletives.
 
Seriously? Here's the thing. I see people here writing how awesome it would be to do this or that in the field. These are people who are most certainly not full-time professional photographers. Have any of you ever tried to manage and edit a library of 100,000 images in the freaking cloud? That solution was, is, and only ever will be an option for laymen.

Seriously, try and understand what Adobe CC is.

1) it is not cloud based
2) apps are installed locally
3) that's it (apart from a monthly call home to check the app is licenced but that doesn't effect Lightroom if you bought it outright)

Biggest problem is that some idiot in Adobe thought it would be a good idea to have cloud in the name.
 
No less than Final Cut Pro X. Plenty of pro's think that's not anywhere close to being a pro app and suitable mostly for prosumers and wedding videographers.

You have a strange definition of "pro" if you don't include wedding videographers in that...

That aside, I don't think this is really the same as FCX, they still had iMovie all the while there clearly separating the professional app from the consumer one. Also, the whole thing with FCX was MASSIVELY overblown, mostly perpetuated by consumers funnily enough.
 
I wonder if this will mean for iMovie and GarageBand in the future?

Will we possibly see an iCloud Movies one day?
 
What if I am just a normal iPhoto user, but I don't' want my pictures going to the cloud? Will keeping them locally not be an option? That's ridiculous
 
Aperture will keep working for the next several years. It's not going to suddenly stop working. People don't need to panic here.

How can you definitively say that? Any OS update, even a minor point, could break some part of it. If Apple doesn't support it then their won't be an official fix so effectively it stopped working.

Also, why would you want to continue cataloging pictures with an program that you know is not long for this earth knowing you'll have to reconvert the edited ones somehow. Better to regroup now w/ a program with more longevity.
 
Seriously? Here's the thing. I see people here writing how awesome it would be to do this or that in the field. These are people who are most certainly not full-time professional photographers. Have any of you ever tried to manage and edit a library of 100,000 images in the freaking cloud? That solution was, is, and only ever will be an option for laymen. Shooting a picture with your iPhone and doing whatever with it on another device is fine for a normal person, but a professional has no need for or desire for such a thing. My rather expensive DSLR is made to take and store pictures, which it does better than ANY other device, and transfer them for corrections, storage, enhancements, etc... The whole point of Aperture was to organize all images, locally stored, to quickly find them or group them when needed. I have never, in 20+ years, stored anything online, over the network, or in the cloud. My collection of hard drives, and their mirrors, have always been the most efficient and reliable system around. Apple is killing professionals in favor of the simple-minded general public who think photography is made of stupid pictures with "neato" filters, rather than a set of technical and creative skills learned and honed over many years.

This announcement saddens me. It not only throws us professionals out in the muck, again, it empowers the mundane and celebrates the talentless cool factor over the practical needs of one of Apple's longest supporting groups. At this rate Apple will be making the entire OS for all devices designed for an IQ level of 3, which will make all of it just useless. Like Windows.

one thing, just because one person might be a "professional photographer" doesnt mean everyone else has an IQ Level of 3 ... for taking random "snaps".

---

looks like Apple is getting rid of the "i" in their software names. can sth like "Photos" even be trademarked?
 
If this follows past patterns:

- The new Photos app will do 99% of what people used Aperture for.

- But not in version one! (There's is SOME hope that the delay of Photos to 2015 makes this not true, but the past pattern is: clean start, then build from there. We saw it with Final Cut on the pro side and iWork on the consumer side when the new version re-gained lost AppleScript tools.)

- But Aperture won't suddenly evaporate. People who need it can keep using it until Photos is ready.

Darn you and your rational response! I was planning to call for torches and pitchforks...
 
Ignore that, it's total rubbish. Nigh on all my fellow photographers use either LR or Capture One.

Yeah I'm just curious what (if any) high end solutions have come about since I was a digital tech and all we used was C1.
 
Saw this coming a few years back, mostly with the update that FCPX got.

Apple just couldn't keep up with Adobe in terms of RAW editing and support.

Most of the LR and Aperture users i know in the various photo/imaging industries almost always went to Photoshop to do fine and advanced image editing.

For me, the Lightroom --> Photoshop workflow yielded me better and more consistent results than the Aperture --> Photoshop workflow.

Not to mention, every client I worked for wanted me to work in Lightroom.

It'll be interesting to see what they do with the "Photos" app.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.