Ive would never have deliberated on a toilet like Mac mini Studio. Just a few idiot engineers could do it, in fact it literally sucks. Just for example.Apple doesn’t need Ive.
Ive would never have deliberated on a toilet like Mac mini Studio. Just a few idiot engineers could do it, in fact it literally sucks. Just for example.
At least he confirms what is becoming visible to the (loyal Apple customers) outsiders looking in… that the dark elements within Apple are now running the show and making the decisions… not the people who make and design the things that actually make Apple money… Apple tried that approach many years ago and it didn’t work out to well for them… and the one who left back then ended up returning and expelling the dark (Wall Street) element of the company and then went on to turn the whole place around and into the most successful and wealthy company in the world… they are headed down the same path now and its showing in the products and pricing for those inferior products… hopefully the current batch of executives who have the same parasitical tendencies as Wall Street are expelled from Apple before too much damage is done…Rumors have indicated that Ive left Apple because he became dispirited after the launch of the Apple Watch, with Ive reportedly feeling discontent as Apple was becoming less design focused and more focused on operations. Ive is said to have felt that Cook had little interest in the product development process, and he was allegedly frustrated that Apple's board was populated with directors with backgrounds in finance and operations rather than technology.
Article Link: Apple Ends Partnership With Former Design Chief Jony Ive
following his dream of a paperthin pro machine...
It was an engineering answer to his decree for a thin machine.
You have it on record that he was the one who couldn't really accept the literal 1mm of space saving that the butterfly keyboard brought while the engineers were pulling at his ankles begging him to stop the madness?If you don't give the engineers the space to actually build something that works well, it's on the designer.
Thank god he's finally gone.
It’s also funny how some automatically assume that those who have a laugh know nothing of the subject at hand, and to top that of, refer to very well established points of criticism as “hate”.Funny how people who know nothing about design and Ive's work shout so much hate out.
Hum… I think most people are very happy with the direction of both MacBook lines, and it’s hard to really assess everything before the switch to Apple Silicon is finalized. Other products have been pretty iterative, granted, but most products are.At least he confirms what is becoming visible to the (loyal Apple customers) outsiders looking in… that the dark elements within Apple are now running the show and making the decisions… not the people who make and design the things that actually make Apple money… Apple tried that approach many years ago and it didn’t work out to well for them… and the one who left back then ended up returning and expelling the dark (Wall Street) element of the company and then went on to turn the whole place around and into the most successful and wealthy company in the world… they are headed down the same path now and its showing in the products and pricing for those inferior products… hopefully the current batch of executives who have the same parasitical tendencies as Wall Street are expelled from Apple before too much damage is done…
Apple is doomed. What a fresh take 😄>imagine being a design genius recruited by an industry visionary, only to find the company he help build taken over by the parts & supply guys, money men who only wanted to crank up the margins, and penny-pinching accounting-types who can't see 3-ft in front of them
This is how industry leaders die. Look at Sony, the US legacy automakers, etc. If we continue the automaker analogy, Honda as the breakout newcomer for a time was focused on the fundamentals and building a good product, everything else naturally followed. Conversely, GM did the reverse working backwards from financing tricks, bad products built to a price, and fundamentals so poor it went into bankruptcy until the government stole your tax dollars to keep them alive so they can outsource the last of their US jobs out of the country to show their gratitude
Two sides working together actually. Good to challenge engineering but never to the point of significant degradation of functionality. Usually does not end well. Appears the design side, Jonny Ive, did just that.He's a designer. The keyboard was an engineering mishap.
So a few issues over decades of work? And none I would categorize as "Terrible to use". OK maybe the butterfly keyboards.Macbook pros with touchbars and/or butterfly keyboards. Both were a direct result of his choices and priorities.
iMac's without user replaceable parts because he didn't want screws on the back (general issue, but this was the worst - spinning drives die fast).
Trash can Mac Pro
Any macbook pro with a substandard discrete GPU because the thermal management was lousy because it was too thin and didn't have enough vents
Tim was picked solely for his understanding on securing the supply chain. Apple making 100 million phones a year is an incredible accomplishment and to Steve’s credit he saw the future and realized Tim was the one that could best secure Apple’s future.I think we all seen this coming at some point, the real relationship was Steve and Jony, not so much Tim. I liked a lot of the things that Ive has done for Apple. Both teams are on different paths on what they want to give their customers.
Jony would definitely prefer the notch to thicker bezels which would be the alternative. He doesn’t like thick things.The notch on MacBooks was too much for him lol
Yes good riddance to that guy who designed all those ground breaking and innovative devices I spent so much money on over the last 15 years. He really suckkked.Good riddance. He made products and software that looked nice but was terrible to use.