I tend to agree, although some of the hardware discrepancies make more sense to me than others.
For example, when the 15" Macbook Pro retina didn't get the CPU architecture update that the 13" version received, that was nobody's fault but Intel for lagging behind in getting the quad-core version of the processor ready on time. Apple just updated using what was available to them.
The decision to keep USB 2.0 xfer speeds in the 9.7" iPad Pro is pretty dumb though, especially for people who want to buy a 256GB version of it! I have to wonder if that was purposely done to offset anger from people who just bought the 12" version, only to find out the new ambient light sensor functionality is only in the smaller one?
I think some of what we're seeing might be Apple trying too hard to get new products released in a timely manner, vs. holding back on some until others can have the exact same feature set? The "old" Apple was constantly criticized for taking forever to get products onto shelves -- so there are pros and cons with either approach.
For example, when the 15" Macbook Pro retina didn't get the CPU architecture update that the 13" version received, that was nobody's fault but Intel for lagging behind in getting the quad-core version of the processor ready on time. Apple just updated using what was available to them.
The decision to keep USB 2.0 xfer speeds in the 9.7" iPad Pro is pretty dumb though, especially for people who want to buy a 256GB version of it! I have to wonder if that was purposely done to offset anger from people who just bought the 12" version, only to find out the new ambient light sensor functionality is only in the smaller one?
I think some of what we're seeing might be Apple trying too hard to get new products released in a timely manner, vs. holding back on some until others can have the exact same feature set? The "old" Apple was constantly criticized for taking forever to get products onto shelves -- so there are pros and cons with either approach.
They seem more focused on the short term profits now, where as they used to think long term.
Reading the comments here people aren't happy and in the long term that means less customer loyalty, less enthusiasm for their products, less sales etc. How ever on the plus side they'll make more money per product.
Such a shame that a once great company is on the decline already. They're still miles ahead of most other companies but if they keep up like this it's a slow downward slope.
Can't believe the discrepancies in product lines. No consistency. Come on apple, stop looking at the money as the driving factor. And before anyone says they're a business thats what they do. First that doesn't mean its what you have to do, second it's not what Steve cared about, he wanted to make something great, the money was a bonus. Third, the money comes from making great products and putting customers first, it's what builds the loyalty in the first place.