Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,543
39,399


Apple's software engineering chief Craig Federighi and marketing chief Greg Joswiak went on a WWDC 2025 media tour this week.

Craig-Federighi-WWDC-2025.jpg

The pair of executives discussed key WWDC 2025 announcements, explained why the more personalized version of Siri is delayed, and more.

We have rounded up their various interview videos below, including their full-length discussion with The Wall Street Journal's Joanna Stern.









Article Link: Apple Executives Discuss WWDC and Delayed Siri Features in Interviews
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lioness~


Apple's software engineering chief Craig Federighi and marketing chief Greg Joswiak went on a WWDC 2025 media tour this week.

Craig-Federighi-WWDC-2025.jpg

The pair of executives discussed key WWDC 2025 announcements, explained why the more personalized version of Siri is delayed, and more.

We have rounded up their various interview videos below, including their full-length discussion with The Wall Street Journal's Joanna Stern.









Article Link: Apple Executives Discuss WWDC and Delayed Siri Features in Interviews

This appears to be a staged and repetitive narrative from Apple, consistently delivering the same message. Their clear intent is to avoid acknowledging Siri as a direct competitor or alternative to ChatGPT. It's contradictory for them to now oppose conversational AI, especially since it's the fundamental interaction for large language models (LLMs)—a technology where natural language achieves results.
Evidently, Apple is struggling to compete with advancements from OpenAI, Google, Meta, and others. Rather than admitting this, they're attempting to reframe the narrative by suggesting they're "not interested in a super intelligent assistant," despite having used AI as a system foundation for years. Their current statements seem to completely disregard the current state of AI technology.
Ultimately, Apple can't concede defeat in this race and needs more time. While patience is understandable, their assertion that a "super intelligent assistant" isn't the future is clearly misguided. This is precisely why companies like OpenAI and Google are investing heavily in this area, integrating LLMs into their products and devices. For Apple Intelligence to truly succeed, it needs a standalone app like Gemini or Grok, in addition to system-wide integration. This moment marks a critical period for Apple, a company seemingly faltering before our eyes for the second time in its history.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9385.jpeg
    IMG_9385.jpeg
    817.3 KB · Views: 67
TLDR: Apple is a tiny startup with limited resources. Their small team is pushing the bleeding edge and wants best-in-class, game-changing features that delight customers. The Apple Intelligence features just weren’t quite ready, so at the very last minute, they had to pull them. But, stay tuned, because the pipeline has never been stronger!
 
Any mention of me getting money back for my 16Pro AI phone that still doesn't have the AI features?
I definitely hope the class action suits go through. I specifically bought my 16 Pro because of the Siri update that was supposed to launch in the Spring. Siri SUCKS and it was the biggest feature that pulled me in to upgrade. I wouldn’t have done so otherwise.
 
Every time I hear that so-called chief engineer at Apple speak, I feel sick. It’s frustrating knowing my house is packed with Apple gear. Most of it is practically useless thanks to Siri, and this might be the last straw. I wasn’t planning on buying anything new for a while, but I’m seriously tempted to give the other side a try. 🫩
 
They definitely made an example out of Gruber lol
I don’t think so, they’re moving the goalposts and still haven’t demonstrated any of those features working.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.