Nope, you'll pay the pocket change needed to be part of the iOS Developer Enterprise Program. I'm sure you have some people in your organization actually knowing how to code? Then make them work for a living and develop the necessary hook-ups to your existing infrastructure.
Even if this is not the solution you envision for your corporation it is probably something you should investigate...
Although tablets (and their definitely great future) will become very common if the price is right, tablets are still not (and likely never will be) a replacement for a traditional pc...tablets will always lag in performance, storage, i/o ports, and their lack of a real keyboard (it takes me 10 times longer to write an email on my iPad than on any pc/laptop I use...imagine how this would affect me in actually writing something longer than 4 paragraphs).
way too optimistic. Tablets will never surpass PCs, not even after 20 years if tablet will even exist. Tablets are convenient and fun on the go or in bed, but have people actually use their tablets when their pc is right in front of them?
This is the same argument like people thinking that hybrids will surpass normal non-hybrids. Not gonna happen.
He's talking about the integration between the various apps. You can't have 2 or 3 or more apps interacting with each others content to form a whole.
You didn't even address his GarageBand to iMovie example. That's a serious problem in iOS and relegates it to pretty much consumer status only. I can't say created graphics in a graphics app and then plop them into a word processing app to ad to my documents or into a presentation app for my presentation.
The differences in thinking . . .
This is what Jobs said a year ago.
http://www.viddler.com/simple/30fe0cca/
Note that Ballmer says something soft, conservative, and status-quo. Typical MS drone-talk.
Then Jobs takes a risk and says something completely radical . . . and absolutely nails it. Again.
The differences in thinking . . .
This is what Jobs said a year ago.
http://www.viddler.com/simple/30fe0cca/
Note that Ballmer says something soft, conservative, and status-quo. Typical MS drone-talk.
Then Jobs takes a risk and says something completely radical . . . and absolutely nails it. Again.
Like always dragging in the dirty laundry to muck up a conversation. Business as usual.
The iPad or any tablet for that matter will never replace my laptop. Typing for an extended time on a touchscreen is just not practical.
It's actually 100% germane to the conversation. I'm sorry if what he said makes you and others uneasy.
Regardless of their lack of qualifications, there's never a shortage of people willing to assume the role of a futurist...
From 1987: Laptops to Supersede Desktops, Analysts Say
Well, although laptops didn't replace desktops, they certainly became just as powerful, popular, and ubiquitous as desktop PCs. And a lot of the other predictions in the article certainly came true: laptops became thin, light, have high-resolution displays, and have (had) standard card architectures for expansion. They also dropped to the predicted $1,000 price point (and then some, of course) making them useful in all the markets listed in the article (e.g. students, professionals, vertical markets).
Laptops were a fledgling technology back then much like tablets are today. Who knows what will happen? Look at the picture of the laptop of 1987. We laugh at that now. Will we look back at the likes of the iPad in another 25 years and laugh at how crude and clunky it was?
Well, although laptops didn't replace desktops, they certainly became just as powerful, popular, and ubiquitous as desktop PCs. And a lot of the other predictions in the article certainly came true: laptops became thin, light, have high-resolution displays, and have (had) standard card architectures for expansion. They also dropped to the predicted $1,000 price point (and then some, of course) making them useful in all the markets listed in the article (e.g. students, professionals, vertical markets).
Laptops were a fledgling technology back then much like tablets are today. Who knows what will happen? Look at the picture of the laptop of 1987. We laugh at that now. Will we look back at the likes of the iPad in another 25 years and laugh at how crude and clunky it was?
Who said anything about replacing your laptop/desktop? The story is about the tablet market eclipsing the desktop. Not too long ago people who carried cell phones were looked at as attention whores. Today it isn't all that uncommon to see somebody with two or three cell phones.
Ah well, frown and stomp all you want. at least you will be in good company...
'I think there is a world market for maybe five computers'
Thomas Watson, Chairman of IBM, 1943
'While a calculator on the ENIAC is equipped with 10000 vacuum tubes and weighs 30 tons, computers of the future may have only 1000 vacuum tubes and weigh only 1.5 tons.'
Popular mechanics, 1949
'I have travelled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a fad that won't last out the year'
Editor in charge of business books for Prentice Hall, 1957
'But what... is it good for?'
Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems division of IBM, commenting on the microchip, 1968
'There is no reason why anyone would want a computer in the home'
Ken Olson, Present, Chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977
'640K should be enough for anybody'
Bill Gates, 1981
Just because people said things that in hindsight, or in some cases even right then, were stupid doesn't mean that people objecting to the tablet surpassing the PC will be wrong. I bet you could find someone arguing that the laptop would surpass the desktop, or that the netbook would surpass the PC, and there will be lots of claims of technology Y surpassing technology X.
For every comment that turned out wrong, there's also a lot of comments that turned out to be right.
Also, the tablet isn't the height of evolution, it can be surpassed just as as the tablet surpassed the netbook.
Just because people said things that in hindsight, or in some cases even right then, were stupid doesn't mean that people objecting to the tablet surpassing the PC will be wrong. I bet you could find someone arguing that the laptop would surpass the desktop, or that the netbook would surpass the PC, and there will be lots of claims of technology Y surpassing technology X.
For every comment that turned out wrong, there's also a lot of comments that turned out to be right.
Also, the tablet isn't the height of evolution, it can be surpassed just as as the tablet surpassed the netbook.
Regardless of their lack of qualifications, there's never a shortage of people willing to assume the role of a futurist...
From 1987: Laptops to Supersede Desktops, Analysts Say
Image
Screen: 15" 3.5"
Keyboard: full 105 keys none, simulated by overwriting half the screen with soft keys
Mouse: USB not really