This is an "interesting" take.
I'm sure Apple have heard about progressive lenses. I certainly have (I wearing a pair right now as I tap out this reply), and even a dunce like me realises why they are completely irrelevant to a VR headset.
/edit
Of course the irony - regarding your observation - on my not needing to rely on my progressive lenses when using the Apple Vision Pro is not lost on me, and nor I suspect is it lost on the majority of - if I may be so bold as to make the completely unintended pun - readers.
I get the points guys. I’ve been into Apple a looong time.VR/AR headsets have certainly been around for a while, but Apple’s decision to replace the user’s eyeglasses with integral corrective lenses apparently offers an improved visual experience that they deemed worth the added hassle for them and for the consumers.
If by progressive lenses you mean lenses that provide an area for distance vision, reading vision, and an area that blends the two, then yes, even the CEO, age 63, is aware of them. If you are referring different technology, I am certain that Apple is aware of it as well.
[For all we know, something vastly improved is in the works, but Apple wants the software development to move forward while the hardware catches up, regardless of the inconvenience.]
Of course Apple have to get into the game when they think it’s the right time for them. It doesn’t necessarily means that it’s the right timing for all Apple buyers.
That’s why the big fruit company have a few variations of products, to please different customers.
I much rather want a small MBA, preferable smalller then the 13" I have now then a scuba on my face.
An 11" MBA would make me hilariously excited 😆
Last edited: