Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The chips themselved were regular A12s, but I assume the ssd controller was different, and then there was OS difference, too.
Since I didn’t ever get that developer kit, I don’t know for sure, but if I were to guess, they used off-the-shelf A12Z chips with third party support chips, just like Intel motherboards do. While Apple SoC’s are mostly standalone, Intel motherboards have always required a supporting chipset to go with the CPU. Apple likely put in the equivalent of Northbridge and Southbridge support chips and anything else that would be needed to handle virtual memory, many of those things now handled on the SoC, itself. Intel motherboards use Northbridge as a memory controller/hub while Southbridge handles I/O. Since the kit would never be sold to any consumer, they felt they could just cobble parts together like Frankenstein’s monster to do what was needed no matter how slow and inefficient it would be. The M1 was still in the making so they could not use that.

It was this dev kit that fooled people into thinking the A12Z could handle virtual memory, which was the cause of the firestorm over Stage Manager initially being supported only on M1 iPads. Not sure what Apple did to get Stage Manager working without virtual memory, but it worked.
 
it's just planned obsolescence.

Future proofing isn't hard to do; just overspec their devices so that it should be capable of lasting 5,6,7 years.

8 gb of ram? Should be 16 minimum, but there's no harm in overspeccing to 24 or 32gb either.
128gb storage? Show some leadership and start with 1tb across the range.
60hz screens? 120 should be standard but again; what's wrong with overspeccing at 144 or 240.

Every year apple tout that they push the envelope on their processors. Which i applaud because in this regard there's little competition. But they penny pinch on every other aspect of the hardware that it's laughable.

"We don't need these things anyway" say the apologists.
Until you do and you have to upgrade.
 
Mind you, the A14, A15 and A16 all have as powerful of a Neural Engine as the M1 has. So either it isn't related to the SoC at all, but solely to the RAM (in which case Apple is an absolute idiot for going so long with so little RAM in such expensive devices, which incidentally is something people have warned them about that the amount of RAM they gave their devices isn't very future-proof) or this very much is just to get people to buy the next iPhone or the current but more expensive iPhone Pro.

Either way, the sudden explosion of AI absolutely caught Apple with its pants down. The M4 is just another example of that.
I get what your saying but not the m4 part, the m4 is a tank that can pretty much handle anything with ease, Apple isn’t the best company but I will admit the m-series processors are just nuts regardless
 
it's just planned obsolescence.

Future proofing isn't hard to do; just overspec their devices so that it should be capable of lasting 5,6,7 years.

8 gb of ram? Should be 16 minimum, but there's no harm in overspeccing to 24 or 32gb either.
128gb storage? Show some leadership and start with 1tb across the range.
60hz screens? 120 should be standard but again; what's wrong with overspeccing at 144 or 240.

Every year apple tout that they push the envelope on their processors. Which i applaud because in this regard there's little competition. But they penny pinch on every other aspect of the hardware that it's laughable.

"We don't need these things anyway" say the apologists.
Until you do and you have to upgrade.
Exactly! So many years it was that RAM for iPhones is good enough, we don’t need more RAM, iOS is efficient etc. Then comes AI and it’s like oh well, we’re glad that at least iP 15 Pro is capable.
 
Keeping your existing phone and turning off battery- & performance-eating features for all but your most-used apps keeps you with the latest security updates without having to go through new phone churn every couple of years

Great for your sanity & your savings accounts
Another controversial take: do not upgrade your iPhone's iOS from the version that was originally shipped.
 
Iphone 14 pm and 15 were underspecced. Overpriced hardware which was only good for 1 to 2 years. Sad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atog


With iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia, Apple is introducing a new personalized AI experience called Apple Intelligence that uses on-device, generative large-language models to enhance the user experience across iPhone, iPad, and Mac.

Apple-WWDC24-Apple-Intelligence-hero-240610.jpg

These new AI features require Apple's latest iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max models to work, while only Macs and iPads with M1 or later chips will support Apple Intelligence. Since the news came to light, many users have been asking what the reason is for the cut-off.

In The Talk Show Live From WWDC 2024, Daring Fireball's John Gruber put the question to Apple's AI/machine learning head John Giannandrea, marketing chief Greg Joswiak, and software engineering chief Craig Federighi, and this was the response.
Apple's software engineering chief Craig Federighi said that the company's first move with any new feature is to work out how to bring it back to older devices as far as possible. But when it comes to Apple Intelligence, "This is the hardware that it takes... It's a pretty extraordinary thing to run models of this power on an iPhone," he added.

The iPhone 15 Pro models use the A17 Pro chip, which has a 16-core Neural Engine that's up to 2x faster than the A16 chip found in the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus, performing nearly 35 trillion operations per second. Federighi hinted that RAM is also another aspect of the system that the new AI features require, so it is perhaps no coincidence that all the devices compatible with Apple Intelligence have at least 8GB of RAM.

Despite the cutoff, owners of older iPhones still have plenty to look forward to in Apple's upcoming software update: iOS 18 boasts several new features besides Apple Intelligence, and every iPhone that can run iOS 17 is compatible iOS 18. That includes the iPhone XR from 2018.

If you still want Apple Intelligence in your pocket but don't have an iPhone 15 Pro or iPhone 15 Pro Max, you may want to hold out for the iPhone 16 series, which is expected to launch when iOS 18 is released in the fall.

Article Link: Apple Explains iPhone 15 Pro Requirement for Apple Intelligence
It’s a conspiracy!!!!!! Whaaaaaa
 
I expect a company like apple to plan a few years in advance.
Yes, you would, but every phone company got caught with its britches down. Back when those phones were designed, nobody was thinking of AI, so nobody planned for it. All of them weren’t prepared for companies like OpenAI. If OpenAI made phones, tablets, or hardware, they’d probably lead the industry in hardware support. But the ones that do got pantsed.

Hardware-wise, Apple supports more legacy hardware for their AI than anyone else, yet they’re always the only ones that get slammed for it. Neither Google nor Samsung have voiced any plans to support anything beyond their current phones either. Microsoft doesn’t support anything but new hardware, and even then, only four devices so far. Yet not a peep of criticism. No old tablets nor desktop/laptops seem compatible for all of these companies while Apple supports every M-series device going back to 2020. The only reason Apple can support all of these is that they planned ahead for “machine learning”, or as I would call baby-AI. So in a way they did, but not well enough.

People are always demanding Apple come up with features “that take advantage of the hardware”. Then when they do, they’re pummeled for not making hardware going back to the stone ages compatible. Then when they do make old hardware compatible, that’s taken as evidence of some conspiracy to force people to buy other hardware that isn’t. They simply can’t win with some people. Those that complain their 2-3 year old phones are obsolete, they still get 5-6 years of OS updates yet to come. Who knows? Apple might manage to bring a limited set of AI features to older phones in future OS releases, but they’ve got their hands full for the next year just getting out what they announced.
 
Yes, you would, but every phone company got caught with its britches down. Back when those phones were designed, nobody was thinking of AI, so nobody planned for it. All of them weren’t prepared for companies like OpenAI. If OpenAI made phones, tablets, or hardware, they’d probably lead the industry in hardware support. But the ones that do got pantsed.

Hardware-wise, Apple supports more legacy hardware for their AI than anyone else, yet they’re always the only ones that get slammed for it. Neither Google nor Samsung have voiced any plans to support anything beyond their current phones either. Microsoft doesn’t support anything but new hardware, and even then, only four devices so far. Yet not a peep of criticism. No old tablets nor desktop/laptops seem compatible for all of these companies while Apple supports every M-series device going back to 2020. The only reason Apple can support all of these is that they planned ahead for “machine learning”, or as I would call baby-AI. So in a way they did, but not well enough.

People are always demanding Apple come up with features “that take advantage of the hardware”. Then when they do, they’re pummeled for not making hardware going back to the stone ages compatible. Then when they do make old hardware compatible, that’s taken as evidence of some conspiracy to force people to buy other hardware that isn’t. They simply can’t win with some people. Those that complain their 2-3 year old phones are obsolete, they still get 5-6 years of OS updates yet to come. Who knows? Apple might manage to bring a limited set of AI features to older phones in future OS releases, but they’ve got their hands full for the next year just getting out what they announced.
Nope. Apple had ML since A11. So they planned for future AI stuff. They did not expected LLM model to be user friendly so soon. They underspec their phones not with chipset but with RAM. Which is just a greed from their side and it now shows. They basically made obsolent their entire lineup except for very top 15 pro lineup. That is horrible move customer-wise and also regarding ecology. Bc if AI will be any good people will want to have this on their phone so they will ged rid of their current ones pretty quickly which leads to a excessive e-waste just because someone at Apple was greedy with RAM.
 
Nope. Apple had ML since A11. So they planned for future AI stuff. They did not expected LLM model to be user friendly so soon. They underspec their phones not with chipset but with RAM. Which is just a greed from their side and it now shows. They basically made obsolent their entire lineup except for very top 15 pro lineup. That is horrible move customer-wise and also regarding ecology. Bc if AI will be any good people will want to have this on their phone so they will ged rid of their current ones pretty quickly which leads to a excessive e-waste just because someone at Apple was greedy with RAM.
Every company does everything for greed, so this is a lousy accusation. They exist to make money, not to make people happy. Making people happy is a side benefit to making money. However, some people hate Apple so much, they accuse them of wanting to make money! Shocker! Where’s your criticism of Google, Samsung, and Microsoft, who screwed up even worse and didn’t plan ahead? Where’s their tablets and laptops/desktops that can take advantage of advanced AI beyond what you have to buy new? How come they can’t support anything more than their current flagships? But no, only Apple is evil. Yeah, they’re the only ones who want to make money. Righttttt.

Apple put in 6GB because that’s all they needed. Nobody expected to put SLM’s (you can’t fit LLM’s on a phone) in a 6GB phone, so yeah, they sucked at planning, but it was because they didn’t think they needed more than 6GB. Who puts in more than they need? Android always put in more RAM because their memory management is worse, but yet, they still cannot support more than their current flagships. What’s their excuse? Where’s your praise that Apple supports WAY more devices than any other company does?

Machine learning is just another name for AI. But there are degrees to machine learning. They had plans for features they’d put in and built their devices according to those expected needs. Needing an SLM onboard caught them unaware. Basically you are accusing them of not putting in RAM on purpose in order to screw people over for features they didn’t even know they’d need several years in the future.
 
Every company does everything for greed, so this is a lousy accusation. They exist to make money, not to make people happy. Making people happy is a side benefit to making money. However, some people hate Apple so much, they accuse them of wanting to make money! Shocker! Where’s your criticism of Google, Samsung, and Microsoft, who screwed up even worse and didn’t plan ahead?
I'm perfectly ok with them making money. What I have issues with is how they constantly brag about being eco-friendly about everything they do. They even stopped selling leather accessories just to look even better and then they do this?
If they would mean it they would overspec, so that their HW would always last longer then is usual no matter what future brings us, they would always keep some reserve to spare if needed, why? Cause they profile themself as elites, the best this world offer, they brag that they would leave Earth better then they found it and all the bs they spit on us.

But nope, they rather convenently underspec and this is the result. They are all fun and games until they aren't.
Samsung OTOH with their old flagship like is S22 gets at least some of the new AI stuff, why? Cause they didn't underspec..

So Apple should be silent about anything related with ecology from now on. Because right now as we speak, they made 90% of their iPhone lineup e-waste sooner then was expected and they didn't even try.
 
I'm perfectly ok with them making money. What I have issues with is how they constantly brag about being eco-friendly about everything they do. They even stopped selling leather accessories just to look even better and then they do this?
If they would mean it they would overspec, so that their HW would always last longer then is usual no matter what future brings us, they would always keep some reserve to spare if needed, why? Cause they profile themself as elites, the best this world offer, they brag that they would leave Earth better then they found it and all the bs they spit on us.

But nope, they rather convenently underspec and this is the result. They are all fun and games until they aren't.
Samsung OTOH with their old flagship like is S22 gets at least some of the new AI stuff, why? Cause they didn't underspec..

So Apple should be silent about anything related with ecology from now on. Because right now as we speak, they made 90% of their iPhone lineup e-waste sooner then was expected and they didn't even try.
That’s where you’re wrong. They didn’t underspec anything. Did you have one of those pre-iPhone 15 Pro phones? Does it run slowly? Does it run poorly? If you say no, then you are wrong. If it’s not running poorly, they didn’t underspec anything. Do you think they should put 256GB of RAM in it? 1024GB of RAM so it’ll run something in the future they didn’t anticipate? With that much RAM, they could actually likely load an LLM in a phone so it never has to go to cloud servers instead of putting in a much smaller SLM. 6GB ran just fine at the time and for years to come… except one feature. To say they underspec something that runs quite well is not a good argument. Could they have put more in it? Sure, but why would they when they didn’t anticipate needing to? Companies don’t just throw away money. Even if more RAM cost them $2, they sell 200 million of these phones. Companies don’t throw away $400 million a year when they don’t need to.

Get it now how bad an argument you’re making? Underspeccing means they didn’t put enough in it at the time it’s being sold, not for what may or may not happen in the future. Absolutely no company in the world puts in more than is required because they all need to reduce costs while maximizing profits. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Most Android phones don’t even give you two or three years of updates. Was it because they underspecced them? No, it’s because they planned for phones to work at the time they’re sold. That iPhone 14 Pro or iPhone 15 is still going to get iOS 18 plus 5 or 6 more years of updates. When they stop giving upgrades is when the companies feel the new OS’es won’t run well. Apple typically has their phones getting updates for 7 years. They go out of their way to ensure OS updates go as long as possible. Did they fail to plan? Generally no except in this one case. If you want this feature, buy a new phone. If not, don’t. No one cares. Still don’t see you criticize Microsoft, Samsung or Google for poor planning. How come Copilot+ runs on only 4 devices that are no more than 4 days old? Why doesn’t it work on that Asus I bought last month? I actually did buy a $1700 laptop last month that doesn’t support Copilot+, a Zenbook Duo 2024. Am I complaining about it? No. Why doesn’t it work on Windows PC’s going back to 2020?
 
Last edited:
That’s where you’re wrong. They didn’t underspec anything. Did you have one of those pre-iPhone 15 Pro phones? Does it run slowly? Does it run poorly? If you say no, then you are wrong. If it’s not running poorly, they didn’t underspec anything. Do you think they should put 256GB of RAM in it? 1024GB of RAM so it’ll run something in the future they didn’t anticipate? To say they underspec something that runs quite well is not a good argument. Could they have put more in it? Sure, but why would they when they didn’t anticipate needing to? Companies don’t just throw away money. Even if more RAM cost them $2, they sell 200 million of these phones. Companies don’t throw away $400 million a year when they don’t need to.

Get it now how bad an argument you’re making? Underspeccing means they didn’t put enough in it at the time it’s being sold, not for what may or may not happen in the future. Absolutely no company in the world puts in more than is required because they all need to reduce costs while maximizing profits. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Most Android phones don’t even give you two or three years of updates. Was it because they underspecced them? No, it’s because they planned for phones to work at the time they’re sold. That iPhone 14 Pro or iPhone 15 is still going to get iOS 18 plus 5 or 6 more years of updates. When they stop giving upgrades is when the companies feel the new OS’es won’t run well. Apple typically has their phones getting updates for 7 years. Did they fail to plan? Generally no except in this one case.
Underspec in regards of AI future. iPhone 14 Pro will handle everyday tasks well enough. But will be stuck with "unclever" Siri forever despite it's A16 CPU with how many TOPS? 17. Yep, I can shove it up my .... Bc RAM is 6GB and AI on device requires about 5 GB itself.

And that something you still do not understand even when I really try to be as clear as I can. It will handle current tasks but if AI is the future (and Apple believe so) then there is zero future-proofing in this regard. Now if this would be some random company nobody would care, right? But we are talking here elite US tech brand.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: rmadsen3 and Torty
That’s where you’re wrong. They didn’t underspec anything. Did you have one of those pre-iPhone 15 Pro phones? Does it run slowly? Does it run poorly? If you say no, then you are wrong. If it’s not running poorly, they didn’t underspec anything. Do you think they should put 256GB of RAM in it? 1024GB of RAM so it’ll run something in the future they didn’t anticipate? With that much RAM, they could actually likely load an LLM in a phone so it never has to go to cloud servers instead of putting in a much smaller SLM. 6GB ran just fine at the time and for years to come… except one feature. To say they underspec something that runs quite well is not a good argument. Could they have put more in it? Sure, but why would they when they didn’t anticipate needing to? Companies don’t just throw away money. Even if more RAM cost them $2, they sell 200 million of these phones. Companies don’t throw away $400 million a year when they don’t need to.

Get it now how bad an argument you’re making? Underspeccing means they didn’t put enough in it at the time it’s being sold, not for what may or may not happen in the future. Absolutely no company in the world puts in more than is required because they all need to reduce costs while maximizing profits. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Most Android phones don’t even give you two or three years of updates. Was it because they underspecced them? No, it’s because they planned for phones to work at the time they’re sold. That iPhone 14 Pro or iPhone 15 is still going to get iOS 18 plus 5 or 6 more years of updates. When they stop giving upgrades is when the companies feel the new OS’es won’t run well. Apple typically has their phones getting updates for 7 years. They go out of their way to ensure OS updates go as long as possible. Did they fail to plan? Generally no except in this one case. If you want this feature, buy a new phone. If not, don’t. No one cares. Still don’t see you criticize Microsoft, Samsung or Google for poor planning. How come Copilot+ runs on only 4 devices that are no more than 4 days old? Why doesn’t it work on that Asus I bought last month? I actually did buy a $1700 laptop last month that doesn’t support Copilot+, a Zenbook Duo 2024. Am I complaining about it? No. Why doesn’t it work on Windows PC’s going back to 2020?
Iphone 14P was the 3rd iteration with 6GB of RAM. It should have gotten 8GB. With those missing 2GB of RAM it was underspecced. It could't even run AAA games which came out less than a year later.
 
Underspec in regards of AI future. iPhone 14 Pro will handle everyday tasks well enough. But will be stuck with "unclever" Siri forever despite it's A16 CPU with how many TOPS? 17. Yep, I can shove it up my .... Bc RAM is 6GB and AI on device requires about 5 GB itself.

And that something you still do not understand even when I really try to be as clear as I can. It will handle current tasks but if AI is the future (and Apple believe so) then there is zero future-proofing in this regard. Now if this would be some random company nobody would care, right? But we are talking here elite US tech brand.
You can criticize them for not antipicating needing 8GB. Sure go ahead. But they did not underspec based on what they expected they would need. The chip inside your iPhone 14 Pro was designed before anyone had heard the term, LLM. It runs the A16, a chip they started building in 2020 or 2021 that came out in September 2022. According to Gurman, Apple did not even put LLM/SLM-based AI on their roadmap until December 2022, three months AFTER you bought your phone. They’d have to have had Apple Intelligence on their roadmap back in 2020 to know they’d need 8GB. But the lower level machine learning they did plan would have worked fine on that 6GB.

How do you think anyone can antipate something that caught everyone by surprise? They built that phone to last for 7 years on updates AT THE TIME IT WAS BEING DESIGNED. How many companies go out of their way to make updates that last that long, and don’t even promise to do so? They just do it for good customer relations. My Asus Zenbook Duo 2024 that I bought less than a month ago doesn’t have Copilot+. Do you see me complaining about Microsoft and its failure to anticipate? Gee, Apple’s computers going back 4 years work with their new AI. The only reason I mention Microsoft is the double standard people have for giving everyone a pass except Apple. To me, none of the big tech companies knew what was coming and all of them failed to plan ahead on this one issue. But I also know they don’t have a time machine to go back to the past and spend that extra $400 million on 2GB of RAM they didn’t think they’d need. So why complain about it? Suck it up and buy a new Google phone instead if you’re that pissed at Apple. But if you had bought an Android phone at the time you got your iPhone 14 Pro, guess what? It wouldn’t work with Google AI either. And they probably had 8GB on their phones due to poorer memory management on their OS.

But no, in some people’s eyes, Apple can do nothing right, and when they fail to anticipate, it’s because they’re evil and trying to cheat you out of a perfectly good phone you can use for 7 years. Yet everyone else who failed to anticipate gets a pass.

And who knows? Maybe in iOS 19, they’ll bring some partial lesser version of Apple Intelligence to your iPhone 14 Pro, but for now, their engineers are going to be busy spending the next year getting it out for the iPhone 15 Pro and 16’s and all Macs and iPads with M-series chips in them going back to 2020 since it’s only coming out in beta this fall. They may or may not bring out an AI-Junior version in iOS 19, but they didn’t promise Apple Intelligence to you when you bought your phone, did they? Seeing as they didn’t know about needing to build Apple Intelligence themselves in September 2022, that would have been difficult.
 
Iphone 14P was the 3rd iteration with 6GB of RAM. It should have gotten 8GB. With those missing 2GB of RAM it was underspecced. It could't even run AAA games which came out less than a year later.
It wasn’t the RAM that prevented AAA games. It was the new graphics engine with ray tracing that exists only on the A17 Pro, M3 family, and M4 family of chips that enabled those games. They could have put 8GB on those phones and they still wouldn’t have run.
 
You can criticize them for not antipicating needing 8GB. Sure go ahead. But they did not underspec based on what they expected they would need. The chip inside your iPhone 14 Pro was designed before anyone had heard the term, LLM. It runs the A16, a chip they started building in 2020 or 2021 that came out in September 2022. According to Gurman, Apple did not even put LLM/SLM-based AI on their roadmap until December 2022, three months AFTER you bought your phone. They’d have to have had Apple Intelligence on their roadmap back in 2020 to know they’d need 8GB. But the lower level machine learning they did plan would have worked fine on that 6GB.

How do you think anyone can antipate something that caught everyone by surprise? They built that phone to last for 7 years on updates AT THE TIME IT WAS BEING DESIGNED. How many companies go out of their way to make updates that last that long, and don’t even promise to do so? They just do it for good customer relations. My Asus Zenbook Duo 2024 that I bought less than a month ago doesn’t have Copilot+. Do you see me complaining about Microsoft and its failure to anticipate? Gee, Apple’s computers going back 4 years work with their new AI. The only reason I mention Microsoft is the double standard people have for giving everyone a pass except Apple. To me, none of the big tech companies knew what was coming and all of them failed to plan ahead on this one issue. But I also know they don’t have a time machine to go back to the past and spend that extra $400 million on 2GB of RAM they didn’t think they’d need. So why complain about it? Suck it up and buy a new Google phone instead if you’re that pissed at Apple. But if you had bought an Android phone at the time you got your iPhone 14 Pro, guess what? It wouldn’t work with Google AI either. And they probably had 8GB on their phones due to poorer memory management on their OS.

But no, in some people’s eyes, Apple can do nothing right, and when they fail to anticipate, it’s because they’re evil and trying to cheat you out of a perfectly good phone you can use for 7 years. Yet everyone else who failed to anticipate gets a pass.

And who knows? Maybe in iOS 19, they’ll bring some partial lesser version of Apple Intelligence to your iPhone 14 Pro, but for now, their engineers are going to be busy spending the next year getting it out for the iPhone 15 Pro and 16’s and all Macs and iPads with M-series chips in them going back to 2020 since it’s only coming out in beta this fall. They may or may not bring out an AI-Junior version in iOS 19, but they didn’t promise Apple Intelligence to you when you bought your phone, did they? Seeing as they didn’t know about needing to build Apple Intelligence themselves in September 2022, that would have been difficult.
Yep, except M1 series cpu is already good enough even when it's even older just bc of RAM. :D Again it is not a chipset, it's the RAM. Cpu (A16) is on the contrary very good tbh. What a shame we will never use it's potential in LLM and Apple Inteligence as a whole.... it will always be limited with greedy 6GB RAM and will be capable of doing same things like low-tier iPhones of that era.... and not much more except for some camera specific tasks (but not those Apple Inteligence related :))
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmadsen3
Yep, except M1 series cpu is already good enough even when it's even older just bc of RAM. :D Again it is not a chipset, it's the RAM. Cpu (A16) is on the contrary very good tbh. What a shame we will never use it's potential in LLM and Apple Inteligence as a whole.... it will always be limited with greedy 6GB RAM and will be capable of doing same things like low-tier iPhones of that era.... and not much more except for some camera specific tasks (but not those Apple Inteligence related :))
They didn’t plan ahead for the M-series chips either. It was entirely accidental they happen to work. If this were some nefarious Apple plot, they would have limited Apple Intelligence to the M4 artificially and got people to buy iPad Pro 2024 and whatever M4 Macs that will come out this fall. If Apple had announced that it would work only with M4 and the A17 Pro, would people still be complaining?

Of course they would because they ALWAYS complain about Apple even if they offered 20 years of updates and AI worked on iPhones going back to the 2008 iPhone 3G because people would then complain about why it didn’t work with the original iPhone 2007 or the Apple IIe. But at least people wouldn’t be asking stupid questions such as if the limitation on the iPhone 15 Pro was merely a ploy to sell new iPhones because Apple would be supporting just as much as everyone else is. But because they support M1 devices and higher going back to 2020, they get slammed even more and get asked the stupid question. They would be better off if they were being nefarious because journalists would just accept that they were limited just like Android and Windows devices are. People would just shrug and assume AI just requires the best and latest hardware. Only Apple gets criticized for supporting more older hardware than their competitors do.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: rmadsen3
It wasn’t the RAM that prevented AAA games. It was the new graphics engine with ray tracing that exists only on the A17 Pro, M3 family, and M4 family of chips that enabled those games. They could have put 8GB on those phones and they still wouldn’t have run.
Not true. The 14P can run RE village but crashes due to lack of RAM.

Reddit:

TherealGgideon
"Guys I am pleased to say that after 3 days of trial and error I have been able to download and install the game on an iPhone 14 Pro. Took me so long do get it but I was able to today….if u want to download it I am more than able to show u how just dm me… all u need is a windows pc and a really good working brain lol. The game runs very smooth at medium to max settings, I would say tho that the phone heats up really quick so yea"

TherealGgideon:
"Not worth the effort tbh…. If u do end up buying the game like i did which was so dumb of me…. But I just wanted to see how it would perform. The game hard crashes when ur getting chased by lady dimitrescu…. No amount of setting change will help, as soon as u start getting chased down the hall it hard crashes"
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmadsen3
Not true. The 14P can run RE village but crashes due to lack of RAM.

Reddit:

TherealGgideon
"Guys I am pleased to say that after 3 days of trial and error I have been able to download and install the game on an iPhone 14 Pro. Took me so long do get it but I was able to today….if u want to download it I am more than able to show u how just dm me… all u need is a windows pc and a really good working brain lol. The game runs very smooth at medium to max settings, I would say tho that the phone heats up really quick so yea"

TherealGgideon:
"Not worth the effort tbh…. If u do end up buying the game like i did which was so dumb of me…. But I just wanted to see how it would perform. The game hard crashes when ur getting chased by lady dimitrescu…. No amount of setting change will help, as soon as u start getting chased down the hall it hard crashes"
That proves nothing. You can get stuff to crash on a lot of older hardware. That’s WHY they said it required an A17 Pro, M3 or M4. But without the graphics engine, it heats up badly and crashes. That doesn’t mean 2GB would have made any difference at all. Apple specifically stated the new graphics engine allowed the AAA titles. That graphics engine is what kept those games from overheating. I would point out if it were a RAM issue, it wouldn’t be “running smoothly”. It would be stuttering like crazy.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: rmadsen3
They didn’t plan ahead for the M-series chips either. It was entirely accidental they happen to work. If this were some nefarious Apple plot, they would have limited Apple Intelligence to the M4 artificially and got people to buy iPad Pro 2024 and whatever M4 Macs that will come out this fall. If Apple had announced that it would work only with M4 and the A17 Pro, would people still be complaining?

Of course they would because they ALWAYS complain about Apple even if they offered 20 years of updates and AI worked on iPhones going back to the 2008 iPhone 3G because people would then complain about why it didn’t work with the original iPhone 2007 or the Apple IIe. But at least people wouldn’t be asking stupid questions such as if the limitation on the iPhone 15 Pro was merely a ploy to sell new iPhones because Apple would be supporting just as much as everyone else is. But because they support M1 devices and higher going back to 2020, they get slammed even more and get asked the stupid question. They would be better off if they were being nefarious because journalists would just accept that they were limited just like Android and Windows devices are. People would just shrug and assume AI just requires the best and latest hardware. Only Apple gets criticized for supporting more older hardware than their competitors do.
I have issues with their future-proofing and nothing else 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torty
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.