You have zero knowledge about AI and no idea what you're talking about. You're downloading an app where you send just a prompt and requests are processed remotely, not running locally.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Explains iPhone 15 Pro Requirement for Apple Intelligence
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
But the 15 is just a 14 Pro without the nicer screen and camera. So why not also do the regular 14, which is just a 13 Pro... How far back do you think this "scheme" goes?
Their point is that the majority doesn't care either way.
That’s just the thing.
99% of consumers won’t care. They won’t be using it for secret squirrel reasons.
They will be using it to figure out how to solve a math problem, or how to cook a new recipe.
The people who actually CARE about it being built in are the niche crowd.
That is totally correct. But the integration with the OS and other apps is what makes these AI models most useful, in my opinion.
I rarely use GPT/LLMs, because it's so cumbersome to think about a suitable prompt, type or dictate it, and then parse the answer.
And then everyone will be screaming about how poorly it runs. 😫
This. No one cares. Only the tiny niche segment will care if it’s onboard. Only the tiny niche segment will require it for some professional reason to have it onboard.
Google is working on a downloadable keyboard for iOS with built in AI features. Search for GIFs for websites, use cloud AI models to create and search for new emojis and edit photos. All built into a downloadable keyboard, for free.
I disagree. AI has, and still is to an extent, been a ******** marketing word/phrase but you can't deny AI has improved a lot recently.
16GB in "any device" has been more than enough and still is. You do NOT need more than 16GB today if you have a smartphone, tablet, gaming console, or a mid range gaming PC. If you have a high end gaming PC, workstation PC/laptop then you want 32GB.
I think 8GB in MacBooks is a joke in 2024 and do think 12-16GB should have been standard in the last few years.
I don't think Apple knew this was coming. Not many people/companies have known that AI was going to progress so fast in the last 2-3 years. The only companies that seem to have prepared for AI are Nvidia/Microsoft. Of course Apple have long been doing the bare minimum in the effort to force people to upgrade.
They do care about speed and the ability to process all their own data in a secure way which is not possible with remote solutions.
Apple knew what its AI requirements were when developing the 15 series. They intentionally didn’t give the 15 and 15 Plus 8GB; if not to drive 15 Pro sales, then as a way to force iPhone 16 upgrades sooner.
Last edited:
Once again….
99% of consumers do not care.
There have been petabytes of server farms built out in the Midwest of the USA to literally maintain consumer use of cloud based AI.
Only the niche market will care if it runs native.
Only the niche market will require it onboard.
Only the niche market will worry about privacy.
But when it’s used to edit pictures, edit photos and create emojis…..
The vast majority doesn’t care.
Apple says its cloud systems are some of the most secure on the planet, why not use some of that secure infrastructure to have a limited AI experience on non natively housed AI device?
Money.
Moooooooney.
That’s why.
This is the reason why I plan to get an iPhone 16 Plus. Rumor has it that the A18 on the iPhone 16 Plus only has one less CPU and GPU core as the A18 Pro but still has 8 GB of RAM needed to run Apple Intelligence.
They could run it completely in PCC (private compute cloud) for previous models, but it's going to be lot of work / double work, they actually have imessage,contacts,emails etc in icloud anyway to be able to produce personalise results, but we know they wont do it.
5
Maybe you can explain to her how easy it is to upgrade? And I believe Apple stores are still willing to assist.
Crazy to me that Apple has apparently not thought ahead here. If it's RAM, then they could have easily just upped the RAM to 8GB in new phones sold since - say - 2022. Would have cost them almost literally nothing. Even if they just did 8GB of RAM on the Pro models.
I'm only just assuming but I think this is showing that Apple either (1) didn't expect Generative AI to take off this fast and weren't prepared to roll this out so early; the contracts with OpenAI support this theory. Or (2) they wanted to get their generative AI working on a wider variety of hardware but couldn't get the model to run on less than 8GB of RAM.
I feel like #2 is also supports #1, in that if they had more development time they probably could have optimized a bit more to run on 6GB or even 4GB but they probably would have bumped all phones to a min of 8GB eventually. Again, this is an assumption on my behalf. I know LLM's are vast but perhaps they could be much smaller in 2 years (if that's even when Apple would have launched this).
The clarification really cleared that up. "Oomph in the device". Got it.
Lol the Pixel 7 Pro can't run Gemini Nano as well. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is also missing out on a lot of AI stuff...
One can go on and on.
The Apple apologists pretend that’s not the case. But the market was expecting this from Apple demanding it even.
The hope is that AI will generate a “supercycle” where people upgrade in very large numbers.
If Apple made this work in the majority of iPhones they would have undercut that goal.
There was no way this feature was coming to existing iPhones. The iPhone 15 Pro was spared only due to developers needing a device to work with.