That is a really cool idea. You should send feedback to Apple.Now is the perfect time to allow the mini to be rear/satellite speakers in the setup.
That is a really cool idea. You should send feedback to Apple.Now is the perfect time to allow the mini to be rear/satellite speakers in the setup.
Unlikely to ever happen. The sound signature of the mini is very, very different to that of the full-size HomePod.That is a really cool idea. You should send feedback to Apple.
You really do not get it. You are suggesting that a $300 HomePod designed to be part of a stereo pair in acoustically very difficult scenarios is flawed because it does not do what any of scores of $50 speakers do is some kind of flaw in the HomePods. That is absurd. Like claiming 18-wheelers are flawed because they do not do a good job when driving to the market for a loaf of bread.LOL. I expect you have a windows PC in every corner of your home for when you need the right tool…. LOL Come on…
Have you ever seen a surround sound setup? The rear speakers are almost always smaller than the front. It would be fine. They only need to play sounds behind you to simulate the sounds being around you. If you’re made of cash then you could have 4 full size HomePods but it would be nice to be able to use minis for the rear, especially because they’re smaller and more discrete.Unlikely to ever happen. The sound signature of the mini is very, very different to that of the full-size HomePod.
The point is that a surround sound setup is a surround sound setup. Totally different from what HomePods are engineered to do. Folks who have an acoustically appropriate space and want a surround sound setup should buy a surround sound setup.Have you ever seen a surround sound setup? The rear speakers are almost always smaller than the front. It would be fine. They only need to play sounds behind you to simulate the sounds being around you. If you’re made of cash then you could have 4 full size HomePods but it would be nice to be able to use minis for the rear, especially because they’re smaller and more discrete.
I agree with everything you said.Well yes, the two things (sound quality + price) are inseparable. If one wants one sh*t sounding smart speaker for voice comms only then a HP Mini or an Echo will suffice, and $300 is too high.
Or if one has an acoustically very good larger space then something like a pair of Sonos + subwoofer properly configured and driven can do a better value job, maybe even sound better.
But if one wants good stereo sound for music in a smallish acoustically difficult space, then a pair of full size HomePods at $300 each is by far the best choice. Good value even if self-balancing competition existed, which it does not.
You still fail to get it. The point is that non-pairs will not properly stereo pair. Some consumer, no matter how ignorant, does not get to change that reality. No, Apple should not allow consumers to force Apple's $600 stereo speaker sets to sound lousy.I understand that stereo pairing with a prior generation HomePod isn’t a fully optimized experience but Apple should let the consumer decide if it’s important to them.
Many folks like me totally like them at $600 per pair. Fully justified.Only $249 (or less) would justify the existence of this "new" Homepod.hink on
Classic Apple damage control corpo-garble is always comedic gold![]()
No, it does not. No matter what some silly spam UTube link may claim.BS. It sounds noticeably worse.
Cool, it’s clearly not for you then. It’s for people that want ease of use, ease of setup, and aren’t AV tech enthusiasts.I think that decision should be left to the consumer. If they are about 98% the same to the ear then it should be more than fine for most people to pair. They could even add a little asterisk to say it may not be the perfect sound. I think the real reason is they want people to buy new ones or replace all old ones if they had an old one. At one time I had 3 original HPs but have only one now. Apple has added another barrier to me even considering buying this newer version.
I have several surround sound setups, actually, in my own home, including a dedicated home theater room. You need acoustically matching speakers. You can’t just dump any 2+ matching speakers in the rear and expect a consistent experience. This is nothing to do with the size of the speakers.Have you ever seen a surround sound setup? The rear speakers are almost always smaller than the front. It would be fine. They only need to play sounds behind you to simulate the sounds being around you. If you’re made of cash then you could have 4 full size HomePods but it would be nice to be able to use minis for the rear, especially because they’re smaller and more discrete.
The wifi limitation is due to the Apple Watch chip and stereo pair should only work with 2 identical speakers or else it will sound off. Simple as that.In other words a bunch of lame marketing speak that tries to obfuscate real reasons for wifi 4 and lack of stereo mating.
It‘s based on a watch processor, the S7, so that package may only support 802.11n anyways. So long as it’s completely reliable, it should be just fine for any airplay need, plus the Thread radio helps to pickup the slack as well.The explanation about using an older WiFi says nothing. The explanation needs clarification. 🤔
You could buy 2 HomePods and 2 HomePod minis for much less than a surround sound setup. And some people already have 1 or 2 so it’s even less to upgrade. It would just need Apple to enable the software to have left, right, left rear and right rear. Just because you don’t like the idea doesn’t mean others can’t like it.The point is that a surround sound setup is a surround sound setup. Totally different from what HomePods are engineered to do. Folks who have an acoustically appropriate space and want a surround sound setup should buy a surround sound setup.
What issues?We all know it was cancelled because of the issues the OG had
I'm fine with the stereo pairing answer, but the WiFi 4 response was a non-answer.In other words a bunch of lame marketing speak that tries to obfuscate real reasons for wifi 4 and lack of stereo mating.
The clarification is they wanted to maintain a very healthy margin on each unit sold.The explanation about using an older WiFi says nothing. The explanation needs clarification. 🤔