No. T-800 is not Apple. A-800 is Apple.You mean a T-800?
Amazon pitches its little robot as a security device, and I keep thinking that it would be defeated by several heavy blankets piled on top of it.
No. T-800 is not Apple. A-800 is Apple.You mean a T-800?
Amazon pitches its little robot as a security device, and I keep thinking that it would be defeated by several heavy blankets piled on top of it.
Let me answer your question in full - biometric capabilities of AW (S9 in my case) are of most interest and usefullness for me. As an aging amateur athlete, I keep track of my physical performance during training and competitions, my HR, cardio, O2, sleep quality, readiness/recovery. Although other devices have these capabilities (and some outperform AW in specific tasks), AW offers unparalleled collection and integration of all data without sacrificing or limiting other aspects of the AW fuctions or forcing me to have expensive subscriptions to use those features. So, yes, I wear the AW 24/7 and it would be great if Apple found a way to extend battery capacity further. This is where my original comment was directed at - the amount of developer and engineer efforts spent on solving a standing problem versus a robot who's going to follow me around. Yet, as your question implies, it is not an issue for some since one can simply charge AW overnight.Do you wear your watch 24-7, including when you sleep?
I already have a bunch of kids following me around everywhere I go. I really don’t need this lol.
My Tesla pretty much already drives itself with the new FSD update. Within 5 years we should have it fully operational.i'll quote you in 25 years my friend. IT Aint happening.
Just like self driving cars won't happen in 25 years either.
My Tesla pretty much already drives itself with the new FSD update. Within 5 years we should have it fully operational.
lol the same system that has multiple accidents and deaths and relies on cameras to operate?My Tesla pretty much already drives itself with the new FSD update. Within 5 years we should have it fully operational.
Never? That’s a crazy statement. If it’s not 5 years (which I would be shocked given how advanced level 4 autonomy is), it will eventually come. “Never” is a crazy statement to make.Are pedestrians, animals, non-self driving cars and other complex hazards going to disappear in five years? No? Then fully self driving cars won’t arrive on that timeframe. In fact, fully self driving cars are very likely never coming in any significant way due to the complexity of the real world where mistakes can be lethal.
Have you tried the latest version? Incredibly impressive. The system is closer than ever. Will we be able to have full autonomy simply with cameras and the current hardware? I doubt it. But they could reach level 4 autonomy in the next 5 years and claim victory.lol the same system that has multiple accidents and deaths and relies on cameras to operate?
So many Tesla drivers can agree with me FSD isn’t ready. The free month of FSD only affirmed this.
As much as Elmo tells you it’s coming - it’s not. He lies a lot.
Never? That’s a crazy statement. If it’s not 5 years (which I would be shocked given how advanced level 4 autonomy is), it will eventually come. “Never” is a crazy statement to make.
Yeah, not now or in 2,000 years. That’s like reading about those people that said horses would “never” be replaced by machines or humans will “never” reach the moon. 🙄No it isn’t. It’s accurate.
Yeah, not now or in 2,000 years. That’s like reading about those people that said horses would “never” be replaced by machines or humans will “never” reach the moon. 🙄