Remember, streaming was the future, because BluRay was a 'bag of hurt'.Apple is really forcing themselves into the streaming picture. Besides prices, they’re the best.
That's good news. It takes me back to the days of rushing back to Blockbuster Video with their next day returns policy for recent releases - and they actually needed the cassettes in store physically to make money on them.
Anyone know when Apple let you move rentals across devices? That isn’t new too, is it? I distinctly remember buying a rental for a trip on my Mac only to discover it wouldn’t transfer to my iPhone (Apple was very generous with the credit, though).
Woohoo, nice change. My wife has a tendency to fall asleep halfway through movies and we save them for the next night, but always end up losing them because we start too late. Hopefully Amazon does the same.
iTunes rentals are too expensive. The only time I’ve ever done it was during a winter storm and we were snowed in.
Yeah I don’t understand their high rental prices. Some are like $5.99. That’s just ridiculous. I do pay attention for their rental sales, those 99¢ specials. I’ve rented plenty of those, but I don’t enjoy that monitoring process. Honestly if they'd just make their standard rental price $1.99 and 99¢ I wouldn’t even keep my NetFlix subscription. I’d spend that $10/mo on Apple rentals and be just as content. Nor would Redbox ever see me again. It makes me wonder if Apple takes a loss or something on the 99¢ specials that those can’t just be the norm.This is great!
The only thing that can make it better would be to finally lower the price!
Seriously, why is Apple charging $3.99 to rent that Finding Dory in digital format when I could rent a physical copy of the same movie for $1.50 at a Redbox?![]()
Yeah I don’t understand their high rental prices. Some are like $5.99. That’s just ridiculous. I do pay attention for their rental sales, those 99¢ specials. I’ve rented plenty of those, but I don’t enjoy that monitoring process. Honestly if they'd just make their standard rental price $1.99 and 99¢ I wouldn’t even keep my NetFlix subscription. I’d spend that $10/mo on Apple rentals and be just as content. Nor would Redbox ever see me again. It makes me wonder if Apple takes a loss or something on the 99¢ specials that those can’t just be the norm.
That was from the beginning.
Rentals in the cloud is this year.
You still have to move or delete downloads or use Home Sharing if downloaded.
I said this in another thread... yep, why pay twice if you decide to buy?! Lots of movies you don’t know from the preview or other reviews if you want to purchase it...While I like this change, what I would really want is that during my 48 hour window, if I liked the movie enough to buy it, I could convert it to a purchase, with the rental price going towards the purchase price.
There are plenty of fantastic films released every year. Unsurprisingly, people who are complaining about "tentpole" movies, or sequels, or "another superhero movie", aren't making a point to see them (this is a bit like the "Current music stinks" argument - sure, popular music played on the radio, but there's amazing stuff coming from lesser known artists).
I was astonished when reading the headline, as it was 48h in Germany ever since. But as mentioned it seems to differ per country.
Better. But now they need to lower their rental prices. With all the $1.50 off coupons I get from Redbox, DVD rental is free (just pay tax) and Blu-ray is $0.50 + tax. And with Play Pass, every 11th rental is free.
[doublepost=1506112738][/doublepost]
Convenience?Seriously, why is Apple charging $3.99 to rent that Finding Dory in digital format when I could rent a physical copy of the same movie for $1.50 at a Redbox?![]()
Only 5 years after Amazon and Google did it. Let's celebrate Apple!
Seriously, why is Apple charging $3.99 to rent that Finding Dory in digital format when I could rent a physical copy of the same movie for $1.50 at a Redbox?![]()