Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Try again. WIFI..... you are missing the point of this thread. TuneIn Offers in app purchases which makes your point mute, assume the other app also does.
I can listen to radio stations (including AM stations) using TuneIn and iHeart apps without spending a dime in-app. Yes it does require WiFi but my response was to the notion Apple is intentionally disabling FM radio capabilities to push Apple Music. That’s absurd.
 
It's a simple problem of Physics. for the 88-108 MHz frequency band you need an antenna of about 80cm/30inches.
Like most FM radios have.
Most phones are a lot smaller. You can solve it by using the headphones cord as an antenna, but otherwise mobile phones operate at much higher frequencies of 900,1800,1900 MHz, which only require a 4-8cm/2-3.5inches antenna.
The quality is never going to be very good, which I think is the main reason Apple didn't pursue it.
 
I can listen to radio stations (including AM stations) using TuneIn and iHeart apps without spending a dime in-app. Yes it does require WiFi but my response was to the notion Apple is intentionally disabling FM radio capabilities to push Apple Music. That’s absurd.

Really? Absurd remember iTunes Radio? Its Absurd to equate radio over wifi to a story about hardware FM

So tell us why the Radio is disabled? Something other manufactures have not done?
 
Same here was without power for a almost 2weeks it would be nice to have a fm capability.
Without power means you can’t charge your phone anyway to listen to radio or call or play games or anything. So a battery operated fm/ am Dab whatever will be a lot more useful than a bloody phone. If I lived where disasters happen frequently I would make sure I had a radio and a torch. Wouldn’t want to rely on my phone for a torch either.
 
So much trouble stirred up... that ended up being irrelevant since Apple has no FM chips in the iPhones anymore.

I remembered the iPod Touch had them, not sure if they still do. It would be nice if the jailbreaking community was able to unlock them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eliard



A series of powerful storms over the past six weeks, including Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, has placed renewed pressure on Apple to enable the FM radio capabilities of the wireless modem in every iPhone.

fm-radio-iphone.jpg

The biggest push continues to come from the National Association of Broadcasters, a lobbying group that represents over-the-air radio and television broadcasters in the United States, according to Bloomberg.Both the Qualcomm and Intel chips that enable Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity in every iPhone have a built-in FM tuner that would allow people to listen to FM radio over the air. Apple has not enabled the functionality, forcing users to use an app to stream FM radio over Wi-Fi or cellular data.

Powerful storms can leave thousands or millions of people without power or cellular service for weeks or even months, however, which can make it difficult or impossible to listen to FM radio over Wi-Fi or cellular.

FCC chairman Ajit Pai also renewed his calls for smartphone manufacturers to enable the chip during a recent trip to areas of southern Florida devastated by Hurricane Irma earlier this month, according to the report.

Pai, speaking with ABC affiliate WPBF 25 in West Palm Beach, said the chip is especially valuable "when it's an emergency."In February, at the Future of Radio and Audio Symposium in Washington D.C., Pai said "radio is vital" when disaster strikes.He added that most consumers would enjoy the ability to access free content over the air, like music on FM radio stations, which some critics believe is a key reason why Apple hasn't enabled the functionality.Pai noted that he is a believer in free markets and the rule of law, and he thereby cannot support a government mandate requiring activation of these chips, nor does he believe the FCC has the power to issue such a mandate.

Apple declined to comment on the report, and its stance on the activation of FM receivers in iPhones remains unclear.

Update: FCC chairman Ajit Pai has issued a statement that directly calls on Apple to "step up to the plate and put the safety of the American people first" by activating the FM radio chip in iPhones, in light of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria.Update 2: MacRumors has received the following statement from an Apple spokesperson:We'll update this article if the FCC responds to Apple's statement.

Article Link: Apple Faces Renewed Pressure to Enable FM Radio Chip in iPhones Amid Strong Hurricane Season [Updated]
[doublepost=1506699639][/doublepost]And now all the Apple haters can stop jumping on bandwagons with no wheels.
[doublepost=1506699694][/doublepost]
Really? Absurd remember iTunes Radio? Its Absurd to equate radio over wifi to a story about hardware FM

So tell us why the Radio is disabled? Something other manufactures have not done?

It's not disabled... it's not even available in newer iPhones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdogg836
The fact that FM chips aren't even present in current devices seems to have escaped most critics.

However, in a situation where you don't have access to power, and need to listen to emergency broadcasts on the radio, you are far better off with as mall dedicated AM/FM radio that has replaceable batteries. Save your iPhone power for critical applications, including putting that little puppy into a waterproof bag.

AM/FM radios are cheap.
 
SMS came out in '92.
SMS is not the predominant messaging system on ios. It is, however, part of the carrier's mobile networks that the iPhones support. The carrier offers this capability - its no more a feature than being able to receive calls. Adding FM capability is not similar in the least.
 
SMS is not the predominant messaging system on ios. It is, however, part of the carrier's mobile networks that the iPhones support. The carrier offers this capability - its no more a feature than being able to receive calls. Adding FM capability is not similar in the least.

What? You were making all of these motivational speech-esque claims about Apple supporting the future and crap, saying they'd never support FM radio because it's an old technology and they're a future looking company, completely ignoring the fact they support heaps of old technologies, SMS being one of them.
 
I've used my laptop as a giant iPhone battery in the past for that very reason. Lasts a very long time that way, just have to keep your laptop in sleep mode.

MacBook batteries are 7,000 mAh at most which is not a lot to use as a phone battery. Many power banks come with 15,000 mAh or more these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 01silver4
So someone can afford an iphone but cant afford an FM radio? I live on the gulf coast and an emergency hand crank/solar AM/FM/WB radio is less than $20. This is a non issue.

It’s a non issue if you’re at home when disaster strikes and your radio isn’t damaged. If you’re not at home or the radio is damaged you’re done. So it’s an issue and Apple should enable it in the devices that have it. If you have to buy a third party headphone jack antenna so be it.
 
Yep. Radio is still technology, just nowhere near as fragile as cell systems.

In the same way, if we ever got hit by freak solar storms or an EMP, we'd be reliant on older, simpler non-computerized vehicles.

Always a good idea to keep a backup ;)

Exactly.

Where is your great great grandfathers ebook collection now? :)
 
Without power means you can’t charge your phone anyway to listen to radio or call or play games or anything. So a battery operated fm/ am Dab whatever will be a lot more useful than a bloody phone. If I lived where disasters happen frequently I would make sure I had a radio and a torch. Wouldn’t want to rely on my phone for a torch either.
Did I say I was relying on my phone? I just said it would be nice to have that option. And for your information we have radio and led lanterns not torch. I make sure my family had plenty of water and food as well also a generator so we could keep the phones and iPad computer charge we also have battery packs capable of charging our phones tens times, the cars are in the garage with ful tanks of gas. But one could never have enough when dealing hurricane etc. So if the iPhone had that fm capability it would be most welcome that’s all I am saying.

Have you ever experienced an hurricane? I have lieved through several since a boy growing up in Jamaica. And if you have never been in one, who are you to lecture anyone on how to be prepared for one. Here is the truth even if one is prepared the best they can, we still don’t know what could happen during a storm so many things could go wrong. So you need to calm down and please be more sensitive to people who have to deal with hurricanes etc on a regular basis.
 
And for your information we have radio and led lanterns not torch.

Just a note about being on an international forum:

If you notice, he's from the UK. Outside of North America, people use "torch" instead of "flashlight".

I believe it's short for "electric torch". Which makes a bit more sense nowadays than "flashlight", which supposedly came about because early batteries and bulbs could only be used in short bursts (flashes).
 
Last edited:
So someone can afford an iphone but cant afford an FM radio? I live on the gulf coast and an emergency hand crank/solar AM/FM/WB radio is less than $20. This is a non issue.

I guess it nothing to do money it's just technology these days.
You may have:

1: A computer controlled Gas boiler/heating system
2: A Car
3: A Digital TV/Radio
4: A fridge with food you buy at the store

Does not mean you are wrong. This s is today's world.

Has nothing to do with (use the number above)

1: Can't afford wood and a fireplace to burn them
2: A Horse
3: A old school AM/FM Radio
4: Plants you grow for food.

When things go wrong, our modern world crumbles FAST, and you need to revert back to things that do work.

Like when the internet goes down and you can't watch your movies as you sold all your DVD's

The further along we go, the more fragile and at risk we all become.
Could someone from a bedroom in Russia or china etc, easily stop banks, airlines etc from working in the UK/USA 50 years ago ?
[doublepost=1506777529][/doublepost]
Just a note about being on an international forum:

If you notice, he's from the UK. Outside of North America, people use "torch" instead of "flashlight".

I believe it's short for "electric torch". Which makes a bit more sense nowadays than "flashlight", which supposedly came about because early batteries and bulbs could only be used in short bursts (flashes).

I'm from the UK
And would say torch
Remember we had burning torches way way back. (Fire on the end of a wooden stick)
Torch the witch etc.
 
How about this. The government redirects some of the "perk" and campaign money to build a better emergency infrastructure.
 
Just a note about being on an international forum:

If you notice, he's from the UK. Outside of North America, people use "torch" instead of "flashlight".

I believe it's short for "electric torch". Which makes a bit more sense nowadays than "flashlight", which supposedly came about because early batteries and bulbs could only be used in short bursts (flashes).
Oh ok.
 
Scratch a little harder at this "controversy"--Those who are pushing the FM radio/iPhone agenda are the FCC, NAB and IAB.

The latter two are seeking a mandate that FM radio receivers be placed in all smartphones, because they are feeling the loss of listeners who are reaching instead for Spotify and other internet-delivered music sources. Newer cars make this even easier with Bluetooth connections, and models older than that still often include a headphone jack input (our 2007 Hyundai Elantra had that, and it was far from a top-end model). The NAB and IAB are trying to stuff the genie back in the bottle and make it possible for listeners to use their smartphone to receive terrestrial radio, instead of internet-delivered sources. It doesn't matter to them that wired headphones make a poor substitute for an antenna (which otherwise couldn't be placed in the small form factor of the modern smartphone), or that a $10 battery-powered radio is a much better resource in a disaster than a smartphone could ever be for receiving radio. They're trying to get governments to force all cellphone manufacturers to include this functionality in the phones.

The FCC, on the other hand, has been smarting from criticism which dates back what was seen as a poor response to Sandy, and which has been revisited in the wake of Harvey, Irma, and Maria.It is easier for FCC Commissioner Pai to make Apple a fall guy to pissed-off folks in Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico as a dodge for the shortcomings of the FCC's planning and response.
 
What? You were making all of these motivational speech-esque claims about Apple supporting the future and crap, saying they'd never support FM radio because it's an old technology and they're a future looking company, completely ignoring the fact they support heaps of old technologies, SMS being one of them.

No. I explained the obvious disconnect between the FM radio experience and the intended Apple experience. Obviously Apple needs to support the standard features offered by the mobile networks that the phones are used on. (Can you imagine? “Buy this iPhone - it’s the only phone that can’t use SMS” - come on, that’s zany.)
FM radio dates back to 1933. That’s also significantly older than SMS. There’s no real comparison.
If we followed your wonky logic we could also point out that spread spectrum technology integral to mobile networks is based on frequency hopping systems developed by Heddy Lamarr & George Anthiel in WW2.

Don’t be daft.
 
It’s a non issue if you’re at home when disaster strikes and your radio isn’t damaged. If you’re not at home or the radio is damaged you’re done. So it’s an issue and Apple should enable it in the devices that have it. If you have to buy a third party headphone jack antenna so be it.

Requiring an external antenna is no different from a crank radio in that regard, it's still useless if you left it at home and you're not home. The current talk is about hurricanes, and you definitely know when they are coming so you shouldn't be caught off guard and away from your radio anyway. The discussion is also moot, Apple's new phones don't have an FM chipset and old ones don't have it hooked up. It was just part of a larger chipset they ordered. The reason it was not supported is likely mundane: Apple probably didn't see a benefit to putting development time towards it. Not that it would hurt Apple Music, just that it wouldn't sell more phones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newellj
No. I explained the obvious disconnect between the FM radio experience and the intended Apple experience. Obviously Apple needs to support the standard features offered by the mobile networks that the phones are used on. (Can you imagine? “Buy this iPhone - it’s the only phone that can’t use SMS” - come on, that’s zany.)
FM radio dates back to 1933. That’s also significantly older than SMS. There’s no real comparison.
If we followed your wonky logic we could also point out that spread spectrum technology integral to mobile networks is based on frequency hopping systems developed by Heddy Lamarr & George Anthiel in WW2.

Don’t be daft.

I guess you've never used a modern FM radio, they lock on to a signal and produce it loud and clear. It's not like that spread spectrum technology produces a jitter free experience as is, anyway.

Apple are all about getting rid of things that people previously relied on to get people to move on, be it floppy drives, CD drives or headphone jacks - So not really sure what your point is with that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.