Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This article is proof at just how loyal and strong the Cult of Apple is because as pointed out in the article, the A10 chip is in many other Apple devices which are being supported by iOS 16 but not the A10 equipped iphone 7. As others have pointed out, it's 'planned obsolescence', Apple want's it customers to upgrade to newer phones and they are comming up with all sorts of excuses to try and justify when the iphone 7 has been excluded and the Cult of Apple is lapping it up by defending Apple's actions.

Apple want people to upgrade to newer phones, it's that simple as it gives Apple more money. If Apple dropped support for the A10 chip across the board then yes I can understand their reasoning but to say iOS 16 will be supported on some A10 devices but not the A10 iphone 7 is despicable behaviour in my opinion.
This article is also proof that people forgot what happened the last time an iPhone was supported for "too long". If I'm not mistaken, Apple is being actively sued somewhere in the world right now for the 4s and iOS 9...
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Future-proofing should be less of a consideration nowadays with Macs. Just buy why what you need now and when it's too slow, upgrade. Apple is getting so aggressive at dropping support for Macs.
 
Other companies provide guarantees e.g., for Google Pixel 6, they guarantee Android version updates until at least October 2024 and security updates until at least October 2026. I don't see why Apple couldn't do something similar.
That’s only two maybe three major OS updates and four years of security updates. You do realize that the iPhone 7 shipped with iOS 10, which meant it got 5 years of major OS updates with the (admittedly, unconfirmed) potential for security updates past that. The phone people are complaining about had longer support without any guarantee than the example you’re using will likely get.

And the Pixel 6 will be available for sale, what, a year? (This year to be replaced by the 7 and the 6a, if Google follows its previous pattern.) That’s only a little over two years of guaranteed major OS upgrades if you buy one now. If you bought an iPhone 7 in September 2019, you’d have gotten the same length of support for a device that had already been on market for nearly two years at that point.

Even without a guarantee, Apple provides longer support than Google does with a guarantee, and yet people complain.

Edit: And the fact that Apple keeps older phones supported for longer is part of the reason why Apple can’t realistically guarantee ongoing support for x number of years. Google sticks mostly to the flagship end of the market and has that luxury because of all the cheap no-name Android phones barely suitable for use as a phone. Google sells a flagship phone for a year and then sells a price reduced variant for about a year after that. Apple is the only maker of iOS phones and has to cover every price point in the ecosystem, from the low end to the flagship. So, as the former high end model falls down the line each year, it’s harder and harder to determine how much longer it’ll receive support.
 
Last edited:
You don’t need to go to business school to know this will be a slow year in terms of sales, so they’re pushing previous users to upgrade.

When in doubt: it’s always about sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supergt
  • Like
Reactions: iOS Geek
The iPhone 7, pretty old by computer standards, will still function as it does today. They are not bricking your phone. They are just not giving you more features going forward. This seems more like FOMO than a valid complaint. Notice that the tweets embedded in this story mostly have less than ten "likes" apiece. This is not a huge deal. It's too bad that MacRumors needed to pump up some controversy.
 
It’s weird to see hundreds of comments from consumers telling other consumers they should be happy their phone got even ~4+ years of support and take what they were given, rather than supporting the idea that maybe it’s time to start thinking about longer support windows.

Apple is the industry leader, sure. But let’s push for 10+ year support windows. Obsoleting perfectly good hardware isn’t good for anyone in the long run, even if it makes business sense right now.

Frankly, this matters even more on the Mac side where some of the Intel hardware being obsoleted this year is not that old at all.
Support has a cost. If you want extended support engage Apple with $ to get that support.
 
That’s only two maybe three major OS updates and four years of security updates. You do realize that the iPhone 7 shipped with iOS 10, which meant it got 5 years of major OS updates with the (admittedly, unconfirmed) potential for security updates past that. The phone people are complaining about had longer support without any guarantee than the example you’re using will likely get.

And the Pixel 6 will be available for sale, what, a year? (This year to be replaced by the 7 and the 6a, if Google follows its previous pattern.) That’s only a little over two years of guaranteed major OS upgrades if you buy one now. If you bought a 7 in September 2019, you’d have gotten the same length of support for a device that had already been on market for nearly two years at that point.

Even without a guarantee, Apple provides longer support than Google does with a guarantee, and yet people complain.
I think what the other member meant was, that Google give a specific timeline for support cutoff for the Pixel.
Apple never officially do this for any of their products. So everytime a device is dropped beyond the typical pattern, people will feel iffy.

Wouldn't it be nice if Apple actually put out an official software support timeline of their products? That way, people buying an Apple product beyond its launch date can be better informed of their buying decision. I mean look at Apple still selling Apple Watch S3 today, even though it won't be updated to WatchOS9.
 
That’s only two maybe three major OS updates and four years of security updates. You do realize that the iPhone 7 shipped with iOS 10, which meant it got 5 years of major OS updates with the (admittedly, unconfirmed) potential for security updates past that. The phone people are complaining about had longer support without any guarantee than the example you’re using will likely get.

And the Pixel 6 will be available for sale, what, a year? (This year to be replaced by the 7 and the 6a, if Google follows its previous pattern.) That’s only a little over two years of guaranteed major OS upgrades if you buy one now. If you bought a 7 in September 2019, you’d have gotten the same length of support for a device that had already been on market for nearly two years at that point.

Even without a guarantee, Apple provides longer support than Google does with a guarantee, and yet people complain.

I do realize Apple providers longer OS support but that's not my issue. It's about putting it in writing, instead of leaving it vague and potentially facing backlash if the number/years of OS updates doesn't match what customers thought they'd get.

Again, if other companies can put it in writing I don't see why Apple can't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ian87w
By backlash, do they mean like a dozen people complaining about it on Reddit and online forums making it sound like there are a lot more people unhappy about this than there really are?
Isnt this the same kind of tired argument you always use to dismiss any complaint about apple from anywhere?

As I recall, back in the day, you used the same logic to dismiss the complaints about the butterfly keyboard.
 
As long as people get security updates, I don't understand why they feel forced to upgrade if they don't want to. Apple typically supports an iOS version with security updates for 2 additional years.
 
Spoken like a true Apple executive! Why? If the phone still works, and is capable, why should anyone be forced to upgrade? Not everyone needs the greatest and latest.

If the iPhone 7 still allows these users to text, review their social media, etc, then that's great.
Proceed to complain about not been able to get the latest and greatest by saying: Not everyone needs the greatest and latest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocketbuc
I think what the other member meant was, that Google give a specific timeline for support cutoff for the Pixel.
Apple never officially do this for any of their products. So everytime a device is dropped beyond the typical pattern, people will feel iffy.

Wouldn't it be nice if Apple actually put out an official software support timeline of their products? That way, people buying an Apple product beyond its launch date can be better informed of their buying decision. I mean look at Apple still selling Apple Watch S3 today, even though it won't be updated to WatchOS9.
I edited my post before I saw your reply. I believe my edit addresses that concern, but basically Apple’s hardware longevity (the iPhone 7 was on sale until at least late 2019, possibly into 2020 in price sensitive developing markets) prevents those kinds of support guarantees, while Google only sells three or four makes of phones: a current flagship that they sell for right about a year (and a Pro branded variant of the same), a price reduced version of the previous year’s flagship often released about 6 months after the flagship’s release that also only sells for about 12 to 18 months. Basically Apple would have to change the support guarantee each year the phone’s on market, eventually whittling it down to one or two years guarantee. (And I’m not sure if Apple plans the hardware requirements for their OS releases that far out, they’ve certainly been known to drop hardware after OS development but before developer/public beta release, like the PPC Mac OS X 10.6 beta that leaked.)
 
It is absolutely ridiculous to share these tweets, some with with single digit likes, from completely random accounts, as if they are indicative of some sort of widespread public feeling. The tweets themselves are some of the most childish, ignorant things I’ve read in the past couple days. Really?

”Apple is forcing iPhone 7 users to upgrade”

Right there we should all stop listening.
 
I do realize Apple providers longer OS support but that's not my issue. It's about putting it in writing, instead of leaving it vague and potentially facing backlash if the number/years of OS updates doesn't match what customers thought they'd get.

Again, if other companies can put it in writing I don't see why Apple can't.
Looks like you quoted my post while I was editing it to address that concern. Can you look at the edit and see if my edit addresses that concern?
 
People complaining about 6 years of support?

Also, it’s not like the iPhone 7 will stop working… you can still use it.
Not only that, but support for iOS15 won't stop when iOS16 releases. Ok they aren't getting new features, but they can still use their devices in a secure way
 
It’s also allowing 8 apps to draw on screen at one time. (Not to mention that it’s holding those other apps on the side in memory for as long as it has enough resources to do so.) It’s the memory management that makes all that possible, the changes to UIView and to the window manager, as well as all the other supporting technologies (like changes to drag and drop). It’s not just a view transition, and, as a developer myself, I’m surprised you as a developer would boil it down to such.

I don’t want it to sound like a personal attack, but I’m legitimately curious about your educational and professional background as a developer, if just because it doesn’t seem like you have a lot of experience with system internals or with back-end development (nothing wrong with that, we need front end experts, too). Not that I have a whole lot myself, but I have enough to recognize some of the back end changes they’ve had to make to support Stage Manager. (I mention educational because I had to take some fairly low level classes for my BS, even a course on assembly language and one on graphics primitives, and it doesn’t seem like my school was unusually rigorous in its required classes for computer science.)

I don’t want it to sound like a personal attack, but I’m legitimately curious about your educational and professional background as a developer, if just because it doesn’t seem like you have a lot of experience with system internals or with back-end development

And I'm concerned about yours. It doesn't sound to me like you know much of what you're talking about. I've been developing since the 90s in areas from games, to plugins for 3D animation software, to business applications.

Not that I have a whole lot myself,

Clearly.
 
I’m praying Apple reverses its decision and plans to support the iPhone 7 / 7 Plus. I don’t think it’s that outdated yet.

However, the bottom line is Apple wants you to upgrade.
Finally someone who understands it. Yes, there might a technical requirement for some feature, but Apple has done special updates in the past, why not now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocketbuc
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.