Simply not true. Read the whole judgement in Apple vs. Epic.Monopolies are generally considered anything over 50% share. it doesn't really matter if it's 51% or 99% and the more important issue is anticompetitive practices that would be alleged.
Simply not true. Read the whole judgement in Apple vs. Epic.Monopolies are generally considered anything over 50% share. it doesn't really matter if it's 51% or 99% and the more important issue is anticompetitive practices that would be alleged.
The government has a different take on the situation.Then don't buy iPhones with iOS15.
What does the fact iPhones have carries have anything to do with the matter? Cars have dealerships. Does that matter?The one who came up with gas analogy was you. And it has no relevance as with phones, the consumables are the minutes/internet quota, which is provided by carriers, and you can use iPhones on any carrier.
Walmart stores have more than one competitor. Apple's platform does not.Walmart has a monopoly on what is sold in Walmart. We are using monopoly in a ridiculous non economic way.
Soon there will be no need to jailbreak, with an open Operating System, able to install(side-load) stuff from other sources.I only wish we could jailbreak iOS 15.
Walmart stores have more than one competitor. Apple's platform does not.
That is not even close to being a comment of value.That is not even close to an argument why.
A report submitted to one branch of one part of the US government is hardly “the government’s take.”The government has a different take on the situation.
Both Apple and Walmart have solid significant competition. Microsoft before its spanking had driven the combined market for competitors into the mid single digits.Walmart stores have more than one competitor. Apple's platform does not.
The FTC has an active investigation into Apple's Appstore practices. There are plenty of existing antitrust laws on the books for the FTC to apply.A report submitted to one branch of one part of the US government is hardly “the government’s take.”
All that matters is legislation passed and signed into law, something Congress has essentially forgotten how to do.
I think you need to reread my post a little more closely. I said more than one competitor.Yes it does. It’s called Android.
Have you seen their conclusion? Or will you simply assert that they will agree with yours? Investigation ≠ guilt. Even on the internet.The FTC has an active investigation into Apple's Appstore practices.
well installer was the first thing that allowed you to install apps on your iPhone. Cydia was the first store you could install apps on iOS, but still quite impressive that both are still activly usedYes and no. The true first App Store was Installer which was then followed by Cydia and then Apple's AppStore. Curious note, the AppStore's first logo is actually quite identical to Installer and Cydia. The AppStore also took elements from both Cydia and Installer.
this would be a thing if only you could install android apps on ios or ios apps on android.Yes it does. It’s called Android.
You said "A report submitted to one branch of one part of the US government is hardly the government’s take." I replied there is an active investigation, so clearly the government disagrees with your take to just not buy an iPhone, otherwise they wouldn't have bothered investigating if that were a solution. Asked and answered.Have you seen their conclusion? Or will you simply assert that they will agree with yours? Investigation ≠ guilt. Even on the internet.
I'm curious who's funding his legal fees.
$5 says it's Red China, just like Epic.
It's not over yet, and even when it's over, it won't be the last judgement regarding this.Simply not true. Read the whole judgement in Apple vs. Epic.
Cannot use Apple Pay in Walmart. We need a lawsuit!Both Apple and Walmart have solid significant competition. Microsoft before its spanking had driven the combined market for competitors into the mid single digits.
I think you meant ”asked and blathered.” Also, if your, well, for the sake of argument we’ll call it logic, prevailed, there would be no point in ever doing an investigation of any kind. Here in the real world, conclusions aren’t preordained before the investigation even begins. In your world they apparently are.You said "A report submitted to one branch of one part of the US government is hardly the government’s take." I replied there is an active investigation, so clearly the government disagrees with your take to just not buy an iPhone, otherwise they wouldn't have bothered investigating if that were a solution. Asked and answered.
Who said the conclusion was preordained? You're inventing arguments and then using them to argue against yourself with them.I think you meant ”asked and blathered.” Also, if your, well, for the sake of argument we’ll call it logic, prevailed, there would be no point in ever doing an investigation of any kind. Here in the real world, conclusions aren’t preordained before the investigation even begins. In your world they apparently are.
Cydia is the living proof that Apple users (who want to) can easily handle multiple app stores and/or third party apps. If I am clever enough to know what and what not to download on my Macbook and Windows computer, I am sure can handle it on my iOS device too. Open the gates, Tim.