I'm more intrigued by the 3rd-party analysis than the results. If this is typical of any opinion poll, two percentage points up or down is going to be within the margin of error - 81% could be 83% or 79%. Second, third, and fourth place are essentially a dead heat.
Point: Apple stays essentially flat. "Flat" can't be attributed to either negatives or positives. It's "no change." Unsuccessful leadership at Apple Retail Store? That ought to have sent the numbers down, right? Ditto for all the other items blamed. If those really were bad things, then there must have been good things to counter-balance.
Point: All the other top players increased by essentially the same amount. Coincidence? Does it point to a change in survey methodology? Is it the net result of the companies' efforts to beat Apple (the "We Try Harder" effect), while Apple was unable to beat its own game? Your pick, or None of the Above.
Counter-point: If it was all due to a change of methodology, then perhaps Apple actually went down, while the others did no better than last year. If that's the story that feels good to you, then go with it.
Point: Amazon still delivers the most satisfying experience. It's also the experience that has the least person-to-person interaction. Once an automated system has been carefully honed, there's a consistency of experience that's hard to match with human interaction (at least, so long as the servers are up and system bandwidth is sufficient). Human interaction inevitably results in a mixture of highs, lows, and everything in between. Amazon completely controls the customer experience, while all other players products are sold and serviced by third party retailers. The Apple, Samsung, and Sony experience includes Best Buy, AT&T, Verizon, Sprint...
Do I think human beings and third parties are to blame? No, it's just that Amazon has fewer external variables to deal with, and that people have a tendency to be more enthusiastic when a "machine" performs beyond expectations than they are when people perform beyond their expectations.
Naturally, all machines are designed by humans, and Amazon's accomplishments are quite real - Has anyone, since Amazon's start, been credited with doing online retail better than Amazon? The fact that Amazon continues to raise the bar is equally impressive.
Still, if you've seen the TV spots for Kindle featuring that perfectly pretty and perky tech support rep, arriving instantly on the Kindle's screen, the only human manifestation we have from Amazon outside of Jeff Bezos... haven't you asked yourself why Apple hasn't done the same, or why you've never seen a Genius who's quite as appealing as an actress selected from amongst perhaps 1,000 candidates? Wouldn't we all like a second "take" when we realize we've been less than stellar in human interaction, and wouldn't it be nice if Hair and Makeup could spruce us up between takes? I can imagine an episode of Big Bang Theory where aspiring actress Penny attends a casting call and leaves with a tech support gig, more grist for Sheldon's known disdain for the likes of Apple Geniuses.
So, let us continue to strive to find deep significance in every MacRumors article. Every so often, one of us may get lucky.