If the ODD, FW800, and RJ45 ports have all had their day and gone, then so has removable/replaceable RAM.
It's not at all a guarantee. There's no guarantee until we can confirm shipping models. Hence MacRumors, not MacFacts.
Completely agree. It defeats the point of it being an integrated all-in-one machine and the whole point of a laptop it to be integrated and all-in-one.
Not while it has faster and more reliable bandwidth than WiFi does.
(a) They couldn't fit in a 6970M in that thing even if it retained its current thickness and with the ODD removed; that card is large for a laptop that thin and needs more cooling than you can fit in that enclosure as it stands today. (b) They really couldn't do it if they made it thinner. Not trying to be an ass, but that's physics, unless you're just dreaming on here.
THIS!
THIS TOO!
This would be great were it not for the fact that when Apple gets rid of something internal on something portable, you get thinness wayyy before you ever get (if you ever get) better GPU, better battery, and better design (unless thinness is your idea of a better design in which case, get over yourself and realize that some Mac users actually want a full-featured computer).
No, you're just dealing with a bunch of MacBook-Air-obsessed fanboys.
That's nice. Wake me up when you have the rest of the universe orbiting around you.
Yeah, last I checked, the complete all-in-oneness was the point of a laptop's existence.
Couldn't put it better myself.
If you want robust and intelligent internal design and engineering, Apple laptops, currently, are the best. Yes, while the MacBook Pro line is rigidly stuck at 0.95" thick, we will never see MacBook Pros with mobile Quadros or FireGLs or anything in the portable workstation market; though to be fair, I don't know when I'd ever get that kind of machine over just a desktop anyway. Perhaps there is a market for that kind of a MacBook Pro. In any event, having taken apart both the current crop of Unibody MacBook Pros and similar machines from Dell, HP, and Asus, Apple's internal design IS the best. Otherwise, your points are all valid and correct.
A 15" MacBook Air would be lucky to even have the i7 its 13" cousin has if you do a CTO. Dream on. As for the rest of your argument, it's quite short-sighted and assumes that (a) I want to repurchase all of my content as downloads, (b) downloads are more convenient that things I already physically own. Otherwise, I agree, downloads ARE the future. Not the present.
Having taken these machines apart multiple times, and having followed Apple for as long as I have, I can safely say that you do not know what you're talking about.
Do you see the size of the CPU? Notice that it's not as large as the CPU in the MacBook Pros. This is because the CPU in the MacBook Air is an ultra-low voltage CPU designed for ultra-portibles. They do not make discrete GPUs designed for ultra-portables as (a) it's physically impossible and (b) most people using ultra-portables don't really need or care about the power that a discrete GPU would offer over the Intel HD 3000. If you want a discrete GPU, make it thicker, and if you're making it thicker, why not just have the same 15" MacBook Pro we have today?
This is still a major pain in the ass and at least an afternoon, if not two, of ripping DVDs. Not to mention a crap ton of hard drive space that otherwise wouldn't need to be spent.
The most relevant thing you do in this comment is comment on how my predictions in January were wrong. Fair point, they were wrong. Now get off your high horse and talk about the 15" MacBook Air that the rest of us are talking about.
Clearly you don't know your tech. That IGP powers high res 15" screens in multiple low-end 15" machines all over the market. Unless you were being sarcastic in which case, fail on my part for not seeing it as someone who loves sarcasm himself.