Even in the rain?Instead of Peloton, I ride my bicycle outside in the fresh air. Much cheaper, and I get good-ole vitamin D!!!!!
Even in the rain?Instead of Peloton, I ride my bicycle outside in the fresh air. Much cheaper, and I get good-ole vitamin D!!!!!
you're leaving out the cost of marketing and acquisition costs. Peloton has an existing brand.Wait a minute and let's have a very quick think.
From the article Peloton's market cap is $7.9 billion, although in a fire sale it'll likely go for a lot less than that. They're in trouble financially, they're paying staff off. They may have a loyal following who've bought quite expensive physical goods and have a subscription. They probably are looking for a buyer/white knight and probably would be open to offers.
So, assuming Apple actually wants to get into the spin/cycle arena at all, there are at least two options open to them:-
1) Acquire Peloton (with all the issues it has), prop it up financially for a while, migrate the workouts/classes to Fitness+, update/integrate existing software into Fitness+ and then transfer all their subscribers to Apple Fitness+.
OR
2) Spend (probably a lot less than) $7.9Bn on hiring instructors and maybe a few Peloton developers, partner with a bike company (or develop a branded bike with Nike?♂️) with a decent iPhone/iPad mount on it and ramp up advertising.
Now, we (the readers) mostly have no real insider data/facts/strategic plans knowledge at all, but at first glance, my view is that option two is the one to really study before thinking about option one.
No, I’m not. And given everything else wrong with the company they don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt.You are conflating two different issues that were completely unrelated.
The thing is that #2 is a much less sure thing than #1. Peloton has created an unusual situation where people spend a bunch of money on home exercise equipment, and they actually use it long-term. Apple could easily fail with their attempt, especially if they have to continue to compete with Peloton who already has a good grip on exactly the market Apple is chasing.Wait a minute and let's have a very quick think.
From the article Peloton's market cap is $7.9 billion, although in a fire sale it'll likely go for a lot less than that. They're in trouble financially, they're paying staff off. They may have a loyal following who've bought quite expensive physical goods and have a subscription. They probably are looking for a buyer/white knight and probably would be open to offers.
So, assuming Apple actually wants to get into the spin/cycle arena at all, there are at least two options open to them:-
1) Acquire Peloton (with all the issues it has), prop it up financially for a while, migrate the workouts/classes to Fitness+, update/integrate existing software into Fitness+ and then transfer all their subscribers to Apple Fitness+.
OR
2) Spend (probably a lot less than) $7.9Bn on hiring instructors and maybe a few Peloton developers, partner with a bike company (or develop a branded bike with Nike?♂️) with a decent iPhone/iPad mount on it and ramp up advertising.
Now, we (the readers) mostly have no real insider data/facts/strategic plans knowledge at all, but at first glance, my view is that option two is the one to really study before thinking about option one.
And thanks to this story, I’m up over 10% from my early morning purchase. Thanks to this story for the boost.Largest acqusition of Apple was $3 billion for Beats! That's why this story is pointless, as it is now at $8 billion, thanks to this story. Apple doesn't acquire overpriced companies, but likes to buy smaller startups with good ideas, before they exploit. This story is just some large investor trying to talk up Peloton's stock. I am sorry for them, but they had quite a journey and Kathy Woods really promoting them.
and apple is the king of being expensive to buy and getting customers to do it.That's a tough sell, they are most likely only in trouble because of the costs they charge. It's expensive to buy the equipment and then expensive to pay for the subscription. It was a clever idea but their are other options now that are cheaper.
But the peloton brand is bad, and even if they don’t sell and can survive they would be well served to change it.you're leaving out the cost of marketing and acquisition costs. Peloton has an existing brand.
That's why Salesforce bought slack vs building a messaging app app built using AWS tools (which is basically what slack is). You are buying the reputation, customers, etc.
And try not to get killed. I guess it does get my heart rate up though.Right? The Peloton bike isn’t a replacement for riding outside. I’ve got several friends who are into doing long, 50-100 mile rides on the road bikes, but it’s nothing like the cardio workout you get on a spin bike. Outside, you have to slow down for traffic, stop at stop signs and lights, and watch for people, animals, pot holes, not to mention dealing with the weather and light conditions as you note.
I get on my Peloton and within 10 minutes I’ve got my heart rate up to ~80%+ of my max, and can keep it there or hit max heart rate for 30-60 minutes straight. And when I do get outside for rides, I can go for hours and never be winded.
Obviously this same thing can be done with non-Peloton spin bikes, but I like the camaraderie it encourages.
Yes, you are.No, I’m not. And given everything else wrong with the company they don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt.
but they are in the business of buying companies that are on the cheaper end of what they could be and pouring gasoline on them and making the MC explode.Apple isn't in the rescue business.
So you are saying there were two issues with the product and they didn’t respond immediately either one? I don’t think the fact that it can injure or kill is better than injure and kill.Yes, you are.
The loose screens were the result of inadequately tightened and secured bolts at the assembly stage in the customer's home. The recall was for the lack of a guard on the back of the unit, meaning kids, pets, someone who falls off can be sucked underneath. This latter reason is why the Tread+ is no longer for sale (although plenty of competing units with identical designs are).
Meh, I’ve done that, when I lived in Minnesota. It’s not that big of a deal. You actually get a better workout.Have fun with that at 5AM in the dark when the temperature is -10F
Not questioning their bikes, never seen one tbh, I own what I consider a good quality spin bike since 2013 that I got for about half of that price back then and it is still in the line-up today, last time I checked for under 900.Their basic bike is $1500. It's very good hardware for the price point.
The screens were not a recall. They simply fixed the problem at assembly. Again, completely unrelated and they dealt with it appropriately.So you are saying there were two issues with the product and they didn’t respond immediately either one? I don’t think the fact that it can injure or kill is better than injure and kill.
And the important thing was they didn’t take the issue seriously nor did they respond in a timely way. They messed up and tried to hope people wouldn’t notice or care.
You said it. They resisted a recall because other people made safer products. Did they ever compensate people for putting them at risk? Because 'fixing the issue' isn't sufficient when we are talking about bodily harm.The screens were not a recall. They simply fixed the problem at assembly. Again, completely unrelated and they dealt with it appropriately.
And again, they reasonably resisted a recall on the Tread+ because it was forced to be recalled despite the fact there are many other manufacturers who continue to build treadmills that pose the exact same risk who are not being asked to fix them.
Other companies make products that pose the exact same risks. Not safer products. You said that. So again, you are clearly advocating that those other products not be recalled until they too kill someone. Nice.You said it. They resisted a recall because other people made safer products. Did they ever compensate people for putting them at risk? Because 'fixing the issue' isn't sufficient when we are talking about bodily harm.
Aligns perfectly with the other things they have said.
Fitness+ is not a risk to Peloton at the moment. Apple is currently scraping the bottom of the barrel. Peloton has a huge portion of the valuable customers.I hate articles like these because they just negate any true logic. Not only should Apple not buy Peloton but you literally state in the article Peloton is in trouble because of Apple’s Fitness+. Their best life line would’ve been to merge or acquire another fitness startup to try to broaden their portfolio like Tempo or Tonal or to ink a partnership with someone and they had the money to do so following the run up after their IPO. Shareholders are concerned because there’s no more plays left that don’t end with them taking a bath in losses. As an article put it yesterday if you’re on Apple One they’re practically giving Fitness+ away and they just launched a partnership with United HealthCare where you actually do get it for free for a year (this is in addition to the partnership with LifeTime Fitness that gives you Fitness+ with your membership). This is going to be more of a cautionary tale for companies like Tonal who’s business models are the same. Diversify and don’t be a sitting target.