Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wow. Why doesn't just write the #$%& code for us? Then we might know what is allowed and disallowed.

Between Apple and typical Apple customers, developers are getting closer to not bothering with the platform at all.

----------

Just sent tim an email, although he'll probably never read it. Basically, I told him to make Apple's internal chaos less visible to customers.

He won't read it, he's too busy curled up in the corner crying.
 
That sucks because it was the only reason I bought Transmit. So we can get a refund now, right? Although Transmit already sucked at iCloud Drive stuff before this. Probably Apple's fault though. I could never get Transmit to open any files from iCloud Drive, much less save anything to it. It usually just crashed or pretended like it was doing something and then didn't. iCloud Drive really is a fail. I've never been able to get the photo capability to work. Why is Apple so great at making beautifully designed hardware and software, and yet so utterly and completely hopeless when it comes to services? As a huge Apple user it's the most annoying thing that I deal with every day.

Don't hold your breath waiting for a refund, Apple removed iphoto with ios8 and millions of users and did not refund their money.
 
OK, I think I'm decided. I'm buying a Nexus 6 instead of an iPhone 6. I'm sick of this anti-consumer behavior from Apple.
 
So what good is iCloud Drive if I can't upload files?

OneDrive is a superior service and I have 10TB of space and word, excel and powerpoint are amazing on iOS devices.
 
ICloud Drive is total pants. It's next to useless.

A brilliant idea put into practice by a 12 year old (no offence to 12 year olds)!
 
Documents by Readdle allows you to move files to and from its iCloud folder, even those created in other apps (both desktop and mobile). Does this spell doom for them as well?

yes, and more important readdle's pdf expert.

solution for transmit: everyone who updated to the latest version can go through their time machine backups and extract the old version of transmit with the sharing capabilities!
 
Apple is just looking out for the security and integrity of their platform. This is in the interests of all consumers.

People in this thread seem to be making a bigger deal of this issue than even Panic - the developers of the app. I think that says it all really. People are blowing this out of all proportion simply because its Apple.

Obviously its regrettable if even a few people/developers switch to Android as a result of this, but the bigger picture 99.999% of us remain happy and delighted as iOS users and would never consider switching.
 
okay goodbye. it's not like you use Transmit or ever would

I love people that "know" all about me. You should be a psychic, you're just as accurate.

zxHCVab.png
 
Apple is just looking out for the security and integrity of their platform. This is in the interests of all consumers.

Please tell me you're being sarcastic. The only people who benefit from boneheaded moves like this are Apple's competitors.

Marco Arment nails it:

One hand isn’t talking to the other: engineering makes great features available to developers that could be used to build amazingly useful and powerful applications, then the App Store bans anything beyond their most trivial uses.
...

Imagine what great developers like Panic could do on iOS, and how much more powerful iOS devices would become, if Apple only stood their ground on policies that mattered.
 
Can't believe this has only got 88 comments on, there should be uproar about this to try and get Apple to reverse the decision. PcCalc I wasn't bothered about because I could kind of understand they didn't want people putting full apps in the dropdown notification menu, its not what its for, its a bit tacky and it drains battery - but this is a ridiculous decision and at least they reversed the PcCalc one.
 
If that is the case why can you upload any file you like from the Finder in Yosemite?

OS X is a different world.

I obviously don't know the precise reasons why Apple has taken this stance on iOS in this specific case. But everything we know about them says they sweat the small details and take an extremely careful approach to ensuring they protect the security of their platforms and privacy of all consumers. I doubt this is a decision they have taken lightly.
 
Apple is just looking out for the security and integrity of their platform. This is in the interests of all consumers.

People in this thread seem to be making a bigger deal of this issue than even Panic - the developers of the app. I think that says it all really. People are blowing this out of all proportion simply because its Apple.

Obviously its regrettable if even a few people/developers switch to Android as a result of this, but the bigger picture 99.999% of us remain happy and delighted as iOS users and would never consider switching.

I will never understand how being allowed to have certain sharing functionality in a certain app of mine would affect you or anyone else who might not be interested in the app in the first place.
 
Apple should shut iCloud Drive down and lock themselves in a room for a few days and come up with something that not only works but is also useful too. Then relaunch it as iOS 8.2 or even 9.

At the moment it's just a bowl of spaghetti!
 
Why don't they just admit that they only want icloud for you to backup your photos, itunes music/media, and email, and call it a wrap. The chances of them ever catching up with Google drive or Dropbox are slipping each time they do this sort of thing. Either clean house, and start anew, or just admit that you want the cloud as locked down as it was previously.
 
The iPad Pro is going to be totally DOA at this rate - iOS is fine for pure media consumption, but way too restrictive for actual work/productivity tasks to get done on it. The Surface Pro will make a total mockery of the iPad Pro.

Its also mostly useless for business - you can't even get an app like WiFi Explorer on to an iPad to do a wireless site survey, which is something the hardware is totally capable of - unless you use a jailbroken device.

People mentioned Coda - the Mac App Store could be a lot more successful, but sandboxing limits the type of apps that can really be served up on the app store. You won't get apps that need to touch the lower levels of the OS, and there's that text editor that can't even edit system text files, etc.

The App Store unfortunately forces apps to be crippleware. For iOS devices, unless jailbroken, its like a Ferrari running with 4 tiny spare donut tires from a compact car.
 
I wonder if they track the number of iCloud drive users vs Dropbox or any other service?

It seems like there would be some key insights if they do.
 
The iPad Pro is going to be totally DOA at this rate - iOS is fine for pure media consumption, but way too restrictive for actual work/productivity tasks to get done on it. The Surface Pro will make a total mockery of the iPad Pro.

Its also mostly useless for business - you can't even get an app like WiFi Explorer on to an iPad to do a wireless site survey, which is something the hardware is totally capable of - unless you use a jailbroken device.

People mentioned Coda - the Mac App Store could be a lot more successful, but sandboxing limits the type of apps that can really be served up on the app store. You won't get apps that need to touch the lower levels of the OS, and there's that text editor that can't even edit system text files, etc.

The App Store unfortunately forces apps to be crippleware. For iOS devices, unless jailbroken, its like a Ferrari running with 4 tiny spare donut tires from a compact car.

I think the message is quite clear. Apple doesn't give a **** about people that want to use their iOS devices for technical work. Same goes with Mac App Store apps. At least with the Mac App Store you often have a non-crippled option on the developer's website.

We are in the nearly insignificant minority of the customer base though. That is, people in technical fields wanting to use iDevices for technical work. There is always jailbreaking, but I often wonder why we should have to.

I wish Apple could loosen the reigns a little and trust people to make their own decisions. Heck, maybe have a guarded API section where any apps linking against certain libraries require a waiver agreement when downloading them from the App Store. Just put a toggle that defaults to on in the App Store settings for hiding those apps from search results.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.