How on earth is this beta functionality?
- The API is in a shipping, final public release build of IOS.
- The API is being used in a released-to-appstore version of Zoom for IOS.
What beta? What testing? This is already in the hands of the public.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Gave Zoom Access to Special API to Use iPad Camera During Split View Multitasking
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- The API is in a shipping, final public release build of IOS.
- The API is being used in a released-to-appstore version of Zoom for IOS.
What beta? What testing? This is already in the hands of the public.
It is Apple’s API, they do not have to let other developers use it. It may not be “fair” but that is life, many things are not “fair” or as my grandfather said “Fair happens twice a year - once in August and once in September! The County Fair and The State Fair!” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The OP probably was talking about unequal treatment of developers being a Beta feature. But he is wrong. This "feature" was released many years ago.
You lost me when you started saying “all devs are treated equally in that…” - so it’s not equality, even by business terms.
Yeah, I think that’s a good comparison you have there. Really, my issue here is that iPadOS shouldn’t have such a restriction in the first place (although I imagine there are security benefits too) but that’s a whole other discussion.
Do you know for a fact that Apple has absolutely no access controls to the APIs? I mean, surely unallowed use of restricted APIs would be caught when being uploaded to the store. And even on a technical level these libs are not statically linked into program. So it makes sense that access controls are possible. One method would be that if you aren't signed as a developer who has access to them to not allow them to be loaded at run time.
Allowing access to something does not constitute bending or breaking a rule rather it’s based on trust and case by case basis I don’t understand why this is even a argument.
Very clear to me. The narrower one defines the limit of equality the more there is disparity. The broader the definition the less there is inequality.
See above. It is equality in treatment. Smaller devs get perks, eg 15% vs 30%, that bigger devs don’t. Larger devs may command more attention. But none of that means that devs don’t get the same rights across the board.
Last edited:
Because controlling access to APIs such as these controls the relative quality of products in competition. It is straight forward anti-competitive behavior.
Proves apple doesn’t treat similar apps equally. It is a big deal.
I recommend AAPL kick off a weekly 1-hour App Dev-focused TV show, called "Tim & Phil," where the two answer questions by App Devs.
I predict it would quickly become the most popular Tech TV show !
I predict it would quickly become the most popular Tech TV show !
You are missing the point - Apple owns the API and they get to decide who gets access to it. If you feel Apple should just give the API to everyone then you probably think think that Apple should totally unlock iOS and give all of it to whoever wants to copy it.
That’s a flawed slippery slope argument. They made an API, and decided not to document it (yet), and only allow Zoom to use it (so far). It’s unclear what their next step is. Do they intend to roll it out in iOS 15?
It's call building a precedent of unfair treatment and in this case they are right. This is 100% anti-competitive behavior.
Completely and utterly wrong. Apple is a company not an individual. This is blatantly anti-competitive. Greedy Apple playing favorites.
Yep. We should all be rooting for apple to lose. I know I am.
Don't build a strawman. Let me speak for me.
Apple doesn't OWN the API: the courts have recently and repeatedly shown you don't own an API. And so what they own is their implementation. Of course, none of that is relevant. What does matter is that Apple is behaving in a controlling and monopolistic manner over a general computing device. That's what iOS devices are -- they're general computing devices. That has historically been against the law, and for good reason. I suspect Apple will be forced by law to make many changes to their operations.
Hopefully they're planning on opening it up to everyone after WWDC this year. But giving Zoom early access is still an unfortunate competitive advantage.
Apple wont lose. All the people in the position of judgement use their products and want their favoritism. Apple is basically a church now-a-days.