You have no idea what I'm for or against. So, stop trying to figure it out.
Also, as stated by others in this thread, Apple should just arbitrarily take $1 Billion and split it amongst all of their current employees, regardless of what that employee does or how well they do it. I guess that is what you would like, right, since you seem to like to try and tell others what they stand for.
Do a terrible job and badmouth the company at every turn to customers and others? Here's a $10,000 bonus! Congrats.
Should Apple give more? Yes, they should. Should they be vilified and insulted for not giving what others THINK they should be giving? No, because that's not going to change anything. Positive criticism is going to work better than negative criticism to enact change.
I never said give each employee 10 k regardless of what they do.
But what I said was that works out 10k per employees.
Ways to break that down options.
Performance based.
Salary based. Aka you figure out what the percentage of total pay role that 1 billion is and give bonuses based on that.
As for should they do more YES.
Should they be vilified for the token insult YES. Should they be vilified for being well below others YES.
Should they be vilified for setting precedence of encouraging this behavior YES.
Positive there is no positive there. This falls under insulting. They should do more and we should demand more. You are saying you are ok with doing less and applaud them for doing less.
Apple actions are a prim example of the larger market and companies. As I said before employees tend to demand and complain more now days across the board on stuff like this because companies have been doing less for years. You have the result of over 30 years of them doing less and less.
So yes we should go after apple for this poor actions.
We should point out that htey should share their profit with their employees.
1 billion for the company is chump changed. Break up that 1 billion in a fair manner.
My company does it as a percentage of pay roll. If it worked out to be 20% of payroll we got a 20% bonus based on our salary for the year.
----------
I think it's more about the US mentality, after all in the US you're expected to give a tip ontop of the price of food. Maybe their culture tells them there are unwritten rules on bonuses? That's all I can think of. Usually where I live it's just the ultra high-ups giving themselves bonuses at this time of the year.
It more we used to get bonuses like this. The bonuses became the norm and yes to the point that they were expected as part of your yearly pay.
They took away bonuses but failed to increase the pay to composite for it.
Heck they reduced yearly pay raises. Pay raises now are basically COL if that. Many people get no pay raise year to year so in reality they are taking a pay cut. Really pay raise should be higher than inflation every year. No just inflation. Simple fact is you have a year more experience which tends to me you are more productive, you know more about the in and outs of the company which means you can do stuff faster. Your pay should adjust for your increase profit you bring in the company.
But hey that was 30 years ago. Now it is all lets worship the mighty stock holder they are the greatest and gods.