Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ugh.

New product whose utility function is still up for significant debate.

The next new product Apple comes out with must be of the impact of the iPhone. After this announcement, and the release of a product that so many view as somewhat unnecessary, the pressure is on to deliver something that will appeal to the masses. Otherwise, Apple should be viewed as a company that is trying to manipulate loyal customers for the purpose of more profit.

The next one has to be a home run, because I have a feeling this one is not the next "thing." They will sell, at least in the beginning, because all Apple products do.. But sales will still be disappointing.

Anyone else find it odd, by the way, that a company whose motto seemed to be to "think different," which included an advertisement containing the likes of Albert Einstein and Bob Dylan is now releasing a product in a way that is entirely symmetrical with mainstream commercialism so prevelant these days? Overpriced designer fashion houses? Vogue magazine? Gold watches, iPhones, MacBooks? All symbols of the "elite."

I don't get any of it, except the continued chase of the almighty dollar.. Maybe.

I totally get what you're saying. But if Apple truly didn't adapt, then it would be a faluire. I still hold to my belief that the reason why apple is so pissed at Samsung is down to Samsung stealing not their designs, but their product pipeline Map.

Don't get me wrong I'm may be a bit if a fanboy but I think apple has continuously innovated not in technology, but in the continuous idplization of its own products. And that my friend is the reason why they are so successful
 
Purely speculation, I agree, and I'm not saying otherwise. No one can predict the future, nor the markets, which are random. Anyone who says otherwise is lying..

But that doesn't mean I can't have an opinion on the matter.. And thus far, none of the friends in my inner circle are excited for this product, or plan on purchasing one. Perhaps we are not the target market, but I'm assuming Apple is banking on some in the 25-35 working professional demographic to actually buy the watch. But I don't see it. Maybe strictly for fitness purposes? A few might. But mainstream? Wearing them in the office? I don't see that, do you?

And I don't think the fact that it vibrates on the wrist changes anything. Our phones have vibrated the last 10 years, and everything has been just fine. In fact, the number of times were my phone vibrated and I missed it is very low. Very very low. It's happened, but not very often.. Certainly not enough to to warrant buying a completely new device, and strapping it to my wrist for the world to see. There is a reason so many people don't wear watches anymore. They have become almost unnecessary. Not even discussing the social angle, how the rest of society will view wearing a smart watch, I just don't see enough here that is able to overcome so many obstacles. Obviously you disagree, which is fine. We"ll actually have an answer though eventually on all of this, in time.

Just so long as you eat crow if you're totally wrong and this thing turns into something bigger than the iPhone.
 
Why the need for home runs? What exactly will happen to Apple if they don't have a new home run product? They have had strong (though not home run) products for the last 7 years, and they've been growing their user base and profits the entire time.

I hope the Apple Watch and whatever is next (updated Apple TV announced at WWDC?) is a home run, but I'm not betting on it. Most likely it will be like the iPad, which I don't consider a home run for Apple, but would have been a home run for ANY other company.



The fact that the mainstream has taken to Apple products doesn't change Apple's "different" approach to making those products. If you compare how they research, design, and create products to that of Samsung, Microsoft, Google, HP, etc., they are very very different. Yes, they make a ton of money on their products these days, but it's because people are willing to pay for the higher quality of the products. (Cue the folks who will say there is no difference in quality between Apple and others.)

If Apple fails to innovate, its stock price will fall. I suppose they don't have to make home run products, so I guess you"re right, I suppose. Guess I just figured they would like to continue to be a leader when it comes to innovation in the tech space. To do that, I think, requires new form factors of existing products (which they do), technological breakthroughs in existing products (which they do, albeit incrementally), and, I think, breakthroughs in product categories that are not currently available. Maybe I just have high expectations though.

In regards to the mainstream.. I really have no problem with Apple becoming mainstream. It's that Apple changes to become more like the mainstream. It's understandable as to why their doing it, I think, which is to make more money. But long term, I don't think it's a good thing. This is a strange comparison, but it's kind of like going from playing predominately Classic Rock to incorporating mainstream Pop music. It's fine and all, but it would be a shame if changed the core values of the company. Unfortunately, the roll out of this device has moved Apple into becoming more "commercial." Hopefully the quality of the product does not suffer.. So far, it has not. Even the watch, pointless as it is, from what I have heard/read seems to still have a very high build quality.
 
The more I think about it, the less I believe Apple will have the nerve to make their solid gold timepiece uncool and obsolete in a years time.
 
Reminds me of this:

vol5k8.jpg

This exemplifies exactly why I strongly dislike Apple's stainless steel band design. The shape and size of those links is VERY 70's to me. I don't like it in steel, and I dislike it even more in gold. I'd love to see a more segmented steel band, a la this Omega:

Alpha & Omega by Sean Molin Photography, on Flickr
 
Poor Fella. With all those "Multi-Millions" why doesn't he adopt some kids and then he would have a family. And be giving a new life to kids who weren't wanted in the first place.

Must be too selfish or he'd have thought of that on his own.

Not having kids is selfish? I think having kids and being too busy to spend time with them is selfish. I think he made the right choice. Not everyone wants kids. I don't have any kids. Never felt the urge to. Guess I'm selfish, lol.
 
Facepalm

The more and more I hear about the super rich, it makes me sick. 350$ watch does the same thing as a 17,000$ version.... and to just price the hell out of it for fashion? I don't like the direction apple is going. To make innovative, good, top end products I get. Hell! I even respect it! But this just seem silly. And the fact apple gives them to "certain" people to drum up sales of the 350-400$ version that people might be able to afford just shows the stupidity of the sheeple.
 
Reason why I like it is because it looks like the digital retro watches. Would be cool to make a faux gold version. I'd make my UI all LED green or LED blue.
 
The watch does look very late 70s or 80s which is relevant now, as fashion is in a postmodern era. Lots of houses' recent walks have shown similar styles such as drop crotch pants, color block, etc.
 
I'm sorry but that looks terrible. It's so obnoxiously gold that it looks fake.
 
The Haves and the Have Nots

I'm disappointed in Apple for the way they are marketing "Watch" - Steve Jobs is definitely rolling in his grave. I don't want to know about the super rich receiving Free gold watches - Yes, I'm jealous - but then again, I'm much more handsome than Lagerfeld who needs gold to distract people away from his ugly.
Apple is much more than celebrities, and they never needed them before - Apple can deliver a product all on it's own unless there is something completely wrong with "Watch".
Dear Apple,
You need the billions of little people - the rich only make up less than 1% of the world's population and they only need one "Watch".
I'm sorry, but this is the first time Apple has struck me wrong.
 
I want to see a rose gold Milanese Loop

I'm probably going to be slated for this and I appreciate everyone has their own opinion but the Milanese Loop reminds me of a second hand cars salesman or medallion man! Think 'Only Fools & Horses' if you're from the UK!

Not that there's anything wrong with second hand car salesman of course :)
 
Have to say an old bloke with a pony tail whose trademark is wearing gym gloves all the time is not going to influence any of my buying decisions.
 
Hey Apple,

Stop making all these special watches for the rich and wealthy and concentrate on your consumer supply chain. You have a ton of customers, you know the ones who actually pay for your products and grow your bottom line that are waiting for their watches (and other products) to be delivered in a reasonable amount of time.

Thanks,

Paying customer.

/endrant
 
I'm disappointed in Apple for the way they are marketing "Watch" - Steve Jobs is definitely rolling in his grave. I don't want to know about the super rich receiving Free gold watches - Yes, I'm jealous - but then again, I'm much more handsome than Lagerfeld who needs gold to distract people away from his ugly.
Apple is much more than celebrities, and they never needed them before - Apple can deliver a product all on it's own unless there is something completely wrong with "Watch".
Dear Apple,
You need the billions of little people - the rich only make up less than 1% of the world's population and they only need one "Watch".
I'm sorry, but this is the first time Apple has struck me wrong.

The wealthiest 1% will soon own more than the rest of the world's population.
 
sorry but that glove is fugly...
Also don't care the gold watch... steel looks better - IMO.
 
Ugh.
Anyone else find it odd, by the way, that a company whose motto seemed to be to "think different," which included an advertisement containing the likes of Albert Einstein and Bob Dylan is now releasing a product in a way that is entirely symmetrical with mainstream commercialism so prevelant these days? Overpriced designer fashion houses? Vogue magazine? Gold watches, iPhones, MacBooks? All symbols of the "elite."

I agree with you 100% To me Apple is now trying to sell envy... They seem to have lost their mission statement along the way somewhere.

The more and more I hear about the super rich, it makes me sick. 350$ watch does the same thing as a 17,000$ version.... and to just price the hell out of it for fashion? I don't like the direction apple is going. To make innovative, good, top end products I get. Hell! I even respect it! But this just seem silly. And the fact apple gives them to "certain" people to drum up sales of the 350-400$ version that people might be able to afford just shows the stupidity of the sheeple.

Nicely stated and I feel the same way.

And IDGAF what others do with their money - it just seems to me Apple is on a money grab for reasons unknown to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.