Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I suspect Apple still pays superior wages and benefits relative to other retail workers. As they have been for many years.

Still, it's an opportunity for some to whine about Apple being stingy as it helps them to feel good doing so.
As a $2 trillion company, Apple should still be doing better. They market themselves as "good for the world", they advertise their products are superior to their competition.. relatively better than others shouldn't cut it. For example, I don't think iPhone users would take too kindly if Apple reduced OS updates from what they have now to just 6 months past what you'd get on Android. Or ditto with modifying their privacy policies to be worse, but "still better than their competition"
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: citysnaps
These are excellent employee benefits for retail—you don’t need any sort of qualifications to get these jobs
You have to fit the diversity profile of the specific store. Store needs a minority female but you are a better qualified non-minority male? Sorry, no job for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Hobo
Are these considered good employee benefits in the US? 12 sick days, six weeks parental leave and part time staff “now” entitled to annual leave? Man, it must suck to have a job in America.
Considering that the US requires companies to provide a total of 0 sick days, 0 vacation days, and 0 parental leave, yes they are.
$25 for a retail employee is also unrealistically high. Federal minimum wage is only $7.25. Some companies are putting up signs say they’re paying $11/hr to entice applicants. US sucks for workers, but it’s great for corporations.
 
You have to fit the diversity profile of the specific store. Store needs a minority female but you are a better qualified non-minority male? Sorry, no job for you.
At such a low level there are hundreds of qualified applicants, at at certain point it’s simply HR’s preference. Anyway, to a statistician, an applicant from a historically underprivileged demographic that is equally qualified as a not underprivileged applicant appears like a stronger choice. Since statistically speaking the underprivileged applicant had to work harder to get to the same level
 
Except the problem with that is that if EVERY company increases wages, it's a domino effect, and they will end up charging more for goods and services to offset their rising costs, and we will have even more out of control inflation. The only time that companies can increase wages and not pass that along to the consumer is if their sales volume increases and/or their raw materials costs drop so that the higher cost of wages is offset by other cost savings or increase revenue.
The meme about costs being passed 1:1 onto consumers is untrue except in rare cases, and especially not true of Apple. They run high margins. An increase in their costs won't change their pricing proportionately, rather it'll eat into their margins mostly and maybe affect the prices a little. I'll bet the biggest reason behind Apple's recent price increases is that consumers just have more $ to spend now. Nearly 40% of all USD was created since 12/31/2019, and a lot of that was paid out in various forms of stimulus.
 
Last edited:
As a $2 trillion company, Apple should still be doing better. They market themselves as "good for the world", they advertise their products are superior to their competition.. relatively better than others shouldn't cut it. For example, I don't think iPhone users would take too kindly if Apple reduced OS updates from what they have now to just 6 months past what you'd get on Android. Or ditto with modifying their privacy policies to be worse, but "still better than their competition"
I don't see what's "good for the world" about only hiring highly skilled retail workers instead of their current ones.
 
Inflation baby! I cannot wait until we are all millionaires. Or if we are really really unlucky all trillionaires.
They asked us in 4th grade if it'd be a good thing for money to grow on trees. Little did I know that it kinda does.
 
Last edited:
When I left Apple in 2014, I was making $25/hour as a Genius working in the Boston area. So, probably varies on location as well.
 
My comment applied to both skilled and current retail workers.
They can't pay the current retail workers above market rate without rejecting applications from more skilled workers willing to take their place (which they would be willing to for the pay). Similar issue with new openings; they'd get way more applicants than spots and have to pick somehow.

Of course they could just pick employees by criteria other than skill, but why?
 
Last edited:
Why does the repair technician get paid less than the sales person?

Isn't the technician the more difficult job, requiring a more specialised skillset?
Repair technician is a much cushier job than directly dealing with customers all day, and I don't know if it even requires previous experience in repairs.
 
When I left Apple in 2014, I was making $25/hour as a Genius working in the Boston area. So, probably varies on location as well.
All things considered during that year, that’s actually a decent wage looking back seven years ago at ~$25 an hour for a job that requires no college degree or advanced experience. Now, to be a ‘Genius’, obviously you have to have some specified training, so there’s more technical acumen. But in hindsight, looking at what Apple’s paying base employees that doesn’t require a college diploma or any special training in terms of working at a retail level job as of today, ~$25 wouldn’t be sufficient as a ‘Genius’ or very competitive, especially in the Boston area, where cost of living is probably significantly higher.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.