Yet Apple still uses a variety of Samsung parts, though lawsuits persists, it's business as usual.
I'm really tired of these patents. Let everyone share/take ideas and make humanity a better place.
And so it starts. Time for these Asian companies to come up with their own designs.
As extreme as it is, it really is about time that someone stood up to these asian idea thiefs!
Please do not generalize. Not all asians or asian companies are like this. Theft is not unique to asians, it includes european, african, and americans too.
And what makes the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in any way similar to the iPad?
What's gives Apple any write to complain about a totally different product?
Please do not generalize. Not all asians or asian companies are like this. Theft is not unique to asians, it includes european, african, and americans too.
And so it starts. Time for these Asian companies to come up with their own designs.
The Asian education values on memorization and reproduction more than creativity though.
The Asian education values on memorization and reproduction more than creativity though.
How does the Tab 10.1 differ from the Playbook, where Apple can stop sales of it?
FOSS Patents said:The Düsseldorf district court has a reputation for being our equivalent of the Eastern District of Texas in terms of a strong tendency to favor the interests of right holders over those of alleged infringers. About half of all European (!) patent litigation takes place before that court. But apart from that particular court's inclinations, German intellectual property law is much stricter than U.S. intellectual property law with respect to injunctions. In the U.S., an injunction is granted only if the four-factor test is satisfied. Over here, a patent holder is always entitled to an injunction (if an infringement of a valid patent claim is proven, of course). What I just said relates to both preliminary and permanent injunctions. A preliminary injunction is granted if a plaintiff can show in a fast-track procedure that he's very likely to prevail in the main proceeding.
I'm an Apple fanboy as much as the next user of this site, but this is bad for the consumer in general.
The question is no longer relevant. It has been decided through the courts that it is. The issue has been put up for examination in the clear light of day. Those who are paid to know the answer to that question have already decided.
I'm an Apple fanboy as much as the next user of this site, but this is bad for the consumer in general.