So nobody knows what IMEI numbers actually means? This analysis is so pathetic, even if it comes just from a Apple-fan armed with spreadsheet program rather than professional source.
Few things to consider:
1. IMEI codes are not serial numbers. Phone manufacturers receive these numbers GSM association and BABT
2. There is no way of knowing how number blocks have been distributed between manufacturers or how manufacturers use those codes.
There is absolutely no guarantee that Apple has 10 million sequential IMEI numbers, or that Apple would use them sequentially even if it had such large sequential code block.
Here's examples: There's two iPhones with some IMEI codes, lets say 10000001 and 20000001. This causes the machead with spreadsheet program to announce Apple has sold 10 million phones.
but
codes 10000002 to 20000000 could just as well have been allocated to Samsung or Nokia or distributed between Nokia and Samsung or whatever.
or
Apple had that 10 million IMEI code block, but decided to distribute codes among it's different factories in China. So lets say Apple had 2 factories in China and those factories have produced 2 miilion phones in total. Apple gave first the 5 million codes to factory A and next 5 million codes to factory B. There's still plenty of free codes, but Apple needs to open new factory because demand has gone up.Now Apple opens third factory, but instead of redistributing old IMEI codes Apple gets new codes that start with 20000001. Only 2 million and one iPhones woud actually have been produced.
Shorter version:
Checking IMEI codes on random phones is absolutely horrible way of estimating how many such phones has been produced.
Few things to consider:
1. IMEI codes are not serial numbers. Phone manufacturers receive these numbers GSM association and BABT
2. There is no way of knowing how number blocks have been distributed between manufacturers or how manufacturers use those codes.
There is absolutely no guarantee that Apple has 10 million sequential IMEI numbers, or that Apple would use them sequentially even if it had such large sequential code block.
Here's examples: There's two iPhones with some IMEI codes, lets say 10000001 and 20000001. This causes the machead with spreadsheet program to announce Apple has sold 10 million phones.
but
codes 10000002 to 20000000 could just as well have been allocated to Samsung or Nokia or distributed between Nokia and Samsung or whatever.
or
Apple had that 10 million IMEI code block, but decided to distribute codes among it's different factories in China. So lets say Apple had 2 factories in China and those factories have produced 2 miilion phones in total. Apple gave first the 5 million codes to factory A and next 5 million codes to factory B. There's still plenty of free codes, but Apple needs to open new factory because demand has gone up.Now Apple opens third factory, but instead of redistributing old IMEI codes Apple gets new codes that start with 20000001. Only 2 million and one iPhones woud actually have been produced.
Shorter version:
Checking IMEI codes on random phones is absolutely horrible way of estimating how many such phones has been produced.