Lion is the worse OSX yet since Panther IMO ( Panther was the first OSX I really really liked - smoother / better performance / refined)- mainly due to its GUI changes, a few:
(1) LaunchPad? A mess of cluttered icons of all gathered applications.. Not *much* different that having a 'shortcut' to Applications. quicker to use Spotlight or alternatives such as LaunchBar to open the application you want.
(2) Auto hiding scroll bars - thank god you can turn off the automatic hiding of scroll bars - Scroll Bars that hide automatically are a GUI mess - you can't see at a glance if there are more items in a combo box.
(3) only one desktop allowed in full screen applications
(4) Horrid and pointless skins on iCal and AddressBook ( its not the 80s, the vast majority of people know what a computerized calendar and Address Book are ) which make them totally inconsistent with the rest of the GUI / Apple provided applications. Fortunately there's 'hacks' out there to remove the skins.
Some things that work on a small device do not work on a full desktop O/S.
Wow, I wasn't going to post in this thread, but this ridiculous post has coaxed me out.
1) Launchpad is optional, nobody is forcing you by gunpoint to use it to launch your apps compared to more traditional methods such as dock, finder or spotlight.
Personally, I find it useful to launch apps that aren't in my dock, when I don't want to use the keyboard to use indexed based search launchers such as spotlight or Alfred. There is nothing "messy" at all about it. It's just a grid of apps that you can click.
2) Auto-hiding scroll bars is the best thing to happen to the computer interface in a long time. With multi-touch scrolling, scroll bars are completely redundant if you ask me; not to mention UGLY. As for combo boxes, you simply have to touch the track pad or mouse for the scroll bar to pop up and indicate where you are in a list. Seems like a non-issue to me.
3) I don't even get this argument, so maybe it's valid? Seems self explanatory that a full screen app would occupy a sole desktop. Unless your referring to multiple monitors, and not desktops.
4) Two apps have a different skin and this makes Lions "the worst OS X since panther"? Please. While I agree it was a silly design choice it's quite a subjective point to make.
It's like "Lion used some kind of space photo for the desktop background, but I prefer the jungle..I think Lion is broken"
You'll have to do better then that to convince me and others that Lion is a poor operating system.
Last edited: