Absolutely. Same as how I get credit with my wife for cleaning the yard, by paying someone else to do it
Although, fortunately I'm not pushed to do so by some historical society. If I were, then I wouldn't get much credit for doing something I had no choice in.
This and other articles make it sound like Apple itself took apart and reassembled the barn.
Instead, almost certainly a professional historic building moving company was used. I'd like to know who it was.
Conversely, IF indeed some Apple employees stopped working in order to carefully take apart, number, and then rebuild each plank, I'd like to see their story as well. Ditto if Apple hired say, a local historical society, to do it.
As a Brit, I find if funny how Americans refer to things built in the early 20th Century as 'historic'![]()
As an Egyptian, I find it funny how Brits refer to things built in the last couple of 1,500 years as 'historic'.
We call them the histerical society. In my town, anything over 50 years old can be deemed "historical" wherein you may not be able to rennovate, demolish, etc.If people are interested in the story of the barn... it's not important to tech, but a minor bit of Cupertino's history.
https://therealdeal.com/2017/02/12/...l-include-an-surprisingly-low-tech-structure/
1000 years from now, it may be restored to its original location by the Historical Sticklers Society.
This and other articles make it sound like Apple itself took apart and reassembled the barn.
Instead, almost certainly a professional historic building moving company was used. I'd like to know who it was.
Conversely, IF indeed some Apple employees stopped working in order to carefully take apart, number, and then rebuild each plank, I'd like to see their story as well. Ditto if Apple hired say, a local historical society, to do it.
Apple employees did not construct Apple Park campus either, but Apple will get the credit for that building because they paid for it, they spent money on relocating this Barn.
Fun fact: the historic barn was originally built the same year Apple last released a new Mac Mini.
Maybe so, but I have plenty alreadyNot that you'd need such an indicator here, but you know a comment is great when it gets so many likes on page 2. This would have 100+ likes on page 1.
As an Egyptian, I find it funny how Brits refer to things built in the last 1,500 years as 'historic'.
As a Chinese, I find it funny both the Brit and Americans refer things build from the past century or two as 'historic'![]()
Actually it's not great that that Apple did anything to preserve it. That building has what we in the UK call "blue plaque status"Right? Was just thinking the same thing. But it think it is great that Apple did all that to preserve it. It really shows the difference a 100 years can make.
I wonder how it compares in size to the Pentagon.
Ooops - I was thinking of a placebo for history - 25 of those barns come along every minute, 3 weeks long during the Tour de France coverage.As a Brit, I find if funny how Americans refer to things built in the early 20th Century as 'historic'![]()
As a Brit, I find if funny how Americans refer to things built in the early 20th Century as 'historic'![]()
If people are interested in the story of the barn... it's not important to tech, but a minor bit of Cupertino's history.
https://therealdeal.com/2017/02/12/...l-include-an-surprisingly-low-tech-structure/
1000 years from now, it may be restored to its original location by the Historical Sticklers Society.
This and other articles make it sound like Apple itself took apart and reassembled the barn.
Apple reportedly dismantled the redwood barn piece by piece, including every plank, nail, and crossbeam, and made careful notes on its construction.
The drone video reveals that Apple has successfully recreated the barn, although a few of the redwood planks appear to be brightly colored, indicating they might not be original. Apple reportedly stockpiled redwood salvaged from an old grove in case any damaged planks needed to be replaced.
How do they get all the vehicles out of the centre bit of the spaceship?!
You'll get even more amusement out of the fact that in many U.S. localities, things that are built to look like other (historical) things, are regarded as historical regardless of their age. And then the owners are powerless to make repairs or modify the exteriors. Ridiculous.As a Brit, I find if funny how Americans refer to things built in the early 20th Century as 'historic'![]()