Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Absolutely. Same as how I get credit with my wife for cleaning the yard, by paying someone else to do it :)

Although, fortunately I'm not pushed to do so by some historical society. If I were, then I wouldn't get much credit for doing something I had no choice in.

If some historical society is pushing you to clean up your yard, it is probably way overdue.
 
This and other articles make it sound like Apple itself took apart and reassembled the barn.

Instead, almost certainly a professional historic building moving company was used. I'd like to know who it was.

Conversely, IF indeed some Apple employees stopped working in order to carefully take apart, number, and then rebuild each plank, I'd like to see their story as well. Ditto if Apple hired say, a local historical society, to do it.

doubt there's a take-apart for this on GSX, but apple does have it's ways...
 
If people are interested in the story of the barn... it's not important to tech, but a minor bit of Cupertino's history.

https://therealdeal.com/2017/02/12/...l-include-an-surprisingly-low-tech-structure/

1000 years from now, it may be restored to its original location by the Historical Sticklers Society.
We call them the histerical society. In my town, anything over 50 years old can be deemed "historical" wherein you may not be able to rennovate, demolish, etc.
 
This and other articles make it sound like Apple itself took apart and reassembled the barn.

Instead, almost certainly a professional historic building moving company was used. I'd like to know who it was.

Conversely, IF indeed some Apple employees stopped working in order to carefully take apart, number, and then rebuild each plank, I'd like to see their story as well. Ditto if Apple hired say, a local historical society, to do it.

Apple employees did not construct Apple Park campus either, but Apple will get the credit for that building because they paid for it, they spent money on relocating this Barn.
 
Apple employees did not construct Apple Park campus either, but Apple will get the credit for that building because they paid for it, they spent money on relocating this Barn.

Hey, it's fine to say, "Apple moved the barn", because it's understood that it really means "Apple paid someone to move the barn." Unfortunately, the article then gets sloppy by using "Apple" everywhere that most such articles use say, "the moving crew":

"Apple reportedly dismantled the redwood barn piece by piece, including every plank, nail, and crossbeam, and made careful notes on its construction."

"(the barn) which Apple has now completely reassembled after carefully taking it down"

"Apple has successfully recreated the barn..."

Apple likely did not dismantle, take notes or reassemble/recreate the barn themselves, which is the way the article reads. But maybe that's because nobody seems to know who did it.
 
Last edited:
I seriously don't understand how a company that makes 3 laptops, 2 phones, 3 desktops, a watch and a tv streamer, and a few services, needs a place that big. They really don't actually do much.
But it's very impressive. And hopefully it inspires their teams to actually make some of the above good again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bacillus
As an Egyptian, I find it funny how Brits refer to things built in the last 1,500 years as 'historic'.

Sadly Egypt went downhill after the Pyramids were built.
[doublepost=1500010130][/doublepost]
As a Chinese, I find it funny both the Brit and Americans refer things build from the past century or two as 'historic' :D

We don’t. 100-200 years is normal here, 500-2000 is historic for us.
 
Right? Was just thinking the same thing. But it think it is great that Apple did all that to preserve it. It really shows the difference a 100 years can make.
Actually it's not great that that Apple did anything to preserve it. That building has what we in the UK call "blue plaque status"
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/blue-plaques/
Meaning no work can be carried out on that property (land) unless they can convince the local government that whatever is on that property will remain in it's original condition. This is what Steve Jobs did on his last public appearance.


If he couldn't convince them then no new Apple campus. It was in Apple's best interests to do so.
 
Last edited:
As a Brit, I find if funny how Americans refer to things built in the early 20th Century as 'historic' :D
Ooops - I was thinking of a placebo for history - 25 of those barns come along every minute, 3 weeks long during the Tour de France coverage.
But no, it's Apple
So only now I understand what took Joni soo busy and now I understand the lack of a new MacPro, MacMini, Airports, Magsafe and all the mehpgrades
From now, Apple can put everything in old enclosures because here's the symbol of inner reflectiveness: the resurrected barn !!!!

Man, in the course of history, that 1000 day old MacMini feels so brand new ...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
If people are interested in the story of the barn... it's not important to tech, but a minor bit of Cupertino's history.

https://therealdeal.com/2017/02/12/...l-include-an-surprisingly-low-tech-structure/

1000 years from now, it may be restored to its original location by the Historical Sticklers Society.

If you go to Historic Aerials you can view what the Apple Campus looked like in 1948.

https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer

You can view the original location of the barn.
 
This and other articles make it sound like Apple itself took apart and reassembled the barn.

I think that's exactly what happened...

Apple reportedly dismantled the redwood barn piece by piece, including every plank, nail, and crossbeam, and made careful notes on its construction.

The drone video reveals that Apple has successfully recreated the barn, although a few of the redwood planks appear to be brightly colored, indicating they might not be original. Apple reportedly stockpiled redwood salvaged from an old grove in case any damaged planks needed to be replaced.
 
As a Brit, I find if funny how Americans refer to things built in the early 20th Century as 'historic' :D
You'll get even more amusement out of the fact that in many U.S. localities, things that are built to look like other (historical) things, are regarded as historical regardless of their age. And then the owners are powerless to make repairs or modify the exteriors. Ridiculous.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.