jdawgnoonan
macrumors 65816
Has there ever been a government that proved not corrupt?I am sorry to hear this. The U.S. government isn't any different.
Has there ever been a government that proved not corrupt?I am sorry to hear this. The U.S. government isn't any different.
They could sell expensive licenses to field software regardless of development environment.Luckily Xcode isn't necessary to develop iOS apps.
There's the way Apple is doing it, which is a mess that I'm not even going to try to explain, and the way they could do it, which is the same as on Mac...Help me understand this. The DMA mandates that Apple must open up an alternate App Store on Apple's devices. Additionally, Apple may not make any money from the alternate App Store because of its gatekeeper status. If this is so, who maintains the alternate App Store? Who maintains its security? What are its costs? What are the costs to Apple? Can trojan apps in the alternate App Store integrate and infect the Apple ecosystem?
Well I kind of expected this from them...Outstanding
Time to punish the malicious compliance
Shame on Apple
We all expected better than this from the company we've loved all these years
"Apple shares fell 1.1% on Tuesday, giving the iPhone maker a $3.29 trillion market value." Which made them drop below MSFT again.
Well I kind of expected this from them...
As opposed to other countries and unions, who never create new laws, right?This hag and the whole EU cabal needs to pound sand.
"A number of Apple issues"...translation we're short on cash so we need to go to the ATM - Apple Teller Machine and invent some more laws we can retroactively charge Apple with.
So why is japan doing the same as EU? https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/13/japan_smartphone_software_law/the eu regulates tech as much as it does because its own sector can’t compete with anything coming out of the states, japan, s.korea and china
Out of curiosity , why isn’t an App Store analogous to a retail store? When you ‘open’ up shop, you pay either a lease or buy a space . So if you have an App that you want to sell / have ‘items’ to sell, it’s a store. Hence, you pay rent.
Hosting a website isn’t free either , so those who get apps from a website on a Mac, they pay for a ‘domain’ or w/e / maintenance . No?
Why is the App Store being different ? Genuine question, because nothing is free outside the App Store in the commerce/ecommerce world to get started .
Apple ≠ America. Why should America have any say in how private companies are regulated outside of its borders?Come on America stop putting up with this!
Yes, that's it, of course. According to the DMA, and you, Apple has no say or control over the apps downloaded into a user's iPhone because the user spent $999 for it. That is not true. Apple does have a say, and Apple does have control over the content of my device that I paid $999 on. More, I would prefer Apple to defend the content it has created for my phone, and continue to control it over a government agency that seems to have ulterior motives. What do you suppose the DMA commissioners plan to do with all of this extraordinary wealth they would like to take from Apple?All of that is built into the cost of buying a $999+ iPhone.
Apple ≠ America. Why should America have any say in how private companies are regulated outside of its borders?
Then Why should the EU say how private companies are regulated outside of its borders?Apple ≠ America. Why should America have any say in how private companies are regulated outside of its bor?ders
This hag and the whole EU cabal needs to pound sand.
"A number of Apple issues"...translation we're short on cash so we need to go to the ATM - Apple Teller Machine and invent some more laws we can retroactively charge Apple with.
Then Why should the EU say how private companies are regulated outside of its borders?
Why do people defend Apple other than shareholders? Customers are far better off having options. Apple’s closed system is bad for consumers. Tim’s AAPL only cares about shareholders and executives. People need to wake up.I personally don’t plan on side loading apps. But at what point is Apple just going to have to open up iOS to be like macOS where I can download any app I wanted from any source without Apple involvement.
Going to war over in-app purchases does feel brutally American but even if they wanted to do it, that doesn't make it right or fair or justified.if america would go to war for their oil companies, why not for their technology companies?
What are you talking about? The EU is saying how Apple should operate within the borders and for the citizens of its member countries. If you're referring to something else, you're going to have to be more specific.Then Why should the EU say how private companies are regulated outside of its borders?