Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.



Reviews for the new Apple Watch Series 4 models went live this morning ahead of Friday's launch, and in a new press release, Apple has highlighted reviews from several members of the media who were able to spend some hands on time with the new Apple Watches.

Apple shared key review passages from a variety websites focused on tech, health, fitness, fashion, and lifestyle, including The New York Times, Women's Health, USA Today, Hodinkee, Men's Journal, TechCrunch, Vogue, Refinery29, The Independent, Wareable, MobileSyrup, Best Health, The Straits Times, and Vogue Australia.

applewatchseries4reviews-800x540.jpg

Women's Health, for example, said features in the Series 4 make it a powerful device for overall well being that could save your life one day.The New York Times said the new model, which can take an ECG reading, is "one of the most significant developments in wearable gadgets in years," while The Independent said the speed improvements and new health features are noticeable "at every level."Apple, of course, only focused on pulling out positive commentary on the Apple Watch Series 4 models, but reviews for the device were largely positive. Some reviewers didn't think it offered enough to entice Series 3 owners to upgrade, but said that it's more than worthwhile for anyone upgrading from an earlier Apple Watch model.

Anyone who has been considering holding out on purchasing an Apple Watch due to a lack of features or slow performance should also consider checking out the Apple Watch Series 4, according to reviewers, because it is faster, more efficient, and more feature rich than previous models.

Apple's full list of review selections can be seen in the article shared via Apple Newsroom, and more reviews can be found in our review roundup, shared this morning.

The Apple Watch Series 4 will be available starting this Friday, September 21. Customers who pre-ordered a device last week will begin receiving their orders on that day, and those who were not able to secure a pre-order may be able to purchase an Apple Watch from a retail store on launch day.

At this point in time, new Apple Watch Series 4 orders will not begin shipping out until October.

Article Link: Apple Highlights Apple Watch Series 4 Reviews



Reviews for the new Apple Watch Series 4 models went live this morning ahead of Friday's launch, and in a new press release, Apple has highlighted reviews from several members of the media who were able to spend some hands on time with the new Apple Watches.

Apple shared key review passages from a variety websites focused on tech, health, fitness, fashion, and lifestyle, including The New York Times, Women's Health, USA Today, Hodinkee, Men's Journal, TechCrunch, Vogue, Refinery29, The Independent, Wareable, MobileSyrup, Best Health, The Straits Times, and Vogue Australia.

applewatchseries4reviews-800x540.jpg

Women's Health, for example, said features in the Series 4 make it a powerful device for overall well being that could save your life one day.The New York Times said the new model, which can take an ECG reading, is "one of the most significant developments in wearable gadgets in years," while The Independent said the speed improvements and new health features are noticeable "at every level."Apple, of course, only focused on pulling out positive commentary on the Apple Watch Series 4 models, but reviews for the device were largely positive. Some reviewers didn't think it offered enough to entice Series 3 owners to upgrade, but said that it's more than worthwhile for anyone upgrading from an earlier Apple Watch model.

Anyone who has been considering holding out on purchasing an Apple Watch due to a lack of features or slow performance should also consider checking out the Apple Watch Series 4, according to reviewers, because it is faster, more efficient, and more feature rich than previous models.

Apple's full list of review selections can be seen in the article shared via Apple Newsroom, and more reviews can be found in our review roundup, shared this morning.

The Apple Watch Series 4 will be available starting this Friday, September 21. Customers who pre-ordered a device last week will begin receiving their orders on that day, and those who were not able to secure a pre-order may be able to purchase an Apple Watch from a retail store on launch day.

At this point in time, new Apple Watch Series 4 orders will not begin shipping out until October.

Article Link: Apple Highlights Apple Watch Series 4 Reviews
[doublepost=1537409382][/doublepost]As I pretty much destroyed my Series 2 in a bicycle crash a couple of weeks back, getting the Series 4 was a no-brainer. I am looking forward to the health monitoring capabilities.
 
Tempted but I have so many issues with Apple Health that I can't do it. Plus lack of sleep monitoring. The FitBit app is what keeps me with FitBit. Everything is synced online. It's fast. With Apple Health, I have 16 GB of data that I can't export (I've been through to Apple's highest levels of tech support--even executive customer support) and it just doesn't work. And it can't handle all that data so the app is unusably slow. The Apple Watch is exactly the type of thing I would use otherwise. I have a $399 pulse oximeter (the MightySat--it's now 299 but was 399 when I got it), the AliveCor EKG, an Omron 786N blood pressure monitor, a CGM (continuous glucose monitor), and a FitBit Charge 2. I am the exact person who would love the Apple Watch, but I just can't get Apple Health to work well. And for me it's all about quantifying data and looking at long-term trends. Apple has suggested I just delete my Apple Health data because they have no other solution, but for me that's not a solution.

You can export health data with a single button in the health app. There are some apps that help you import exported data, though I don't remember the names of any.
 
Thanks everyone. I’ve never had an Apple Watch but I have smaller wrists and almost got the 38mm but thought it was a little too small (mostly due to the screen) but the 42mm was too big for me.

So I am betting that the 40mm Apple Watch 4 will be the perfect size for me with a bigger screen than the 38mm.
 
I dare say they will make a big song and dance about it when a future series can go more than 24 hours on a charge.

My Series 0 regularly has more than half battery life when I put it on the charger at night after using it for 3 years daily.

If I wanted sleep tracking, I could just charge it in the morning until I'm dressed and it would probably keep up.
 
I don’t see anyone calling out the poor battery life or lack of sleep tracking features. I find that surprising.

A growing consensus amongst medical practitioners is the utmost importance of sleep (probably at least as important as exercise) and Apple Watch still completely fails in this regard.

I dare say they will make a big song and dance about it when a future series can go more than 24 hours on a charge.

I charge my series 3 for about 20 minutes a day while taking a shower and shaving. That’s usually enough to get me back to 95-100% charge.

I also use the Autosleep app for sleep tracking. I don’t even have to turn it on. It detects when I fall asleep and has seemed very accurate (although the accuracy seems to have decreased with WatchOS 5 - hopefully they’ll release an update soon).

So even though Apple doesn’t have a built in sleep app, that doesn’t mean the Apple Watch can’t be used for that. Autosleep even send the data to the Health app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rfrmac
You can export health data with a single button in the health app. There are some apps that help you import exported data, though I don't remember the names of any.
Yes, I'm very familiar with the export option. It's just that it doesn't work. Not on my iPhone 5s nor on my iPhone 7. I've tried it on my dad's iPhone 5s, as well. Same thing. Errors each time--the errors vary by which version of iOS I've upgraded to, but it has never once worked successfully. It took me a long time to even find someone at Apple who knew there was an option to export the data. I eventually wrote to Craig Federeghi and they got some sort of executive customer support person to help me and capture data from my iPhone as it was trying to export that they sent to their engineering team. And they eventually just stopped following up with me.

Originally it would just time out, even leaving the phone plugged in and the screen set not to go to sleep overnight. I can't remember the exact error message. Then in later versions of iOS it would eventually create a file that is 22 bytes in size (when the Apple Health app has over 16 GB of data). The file obviously doesn't contain the data based on its size and also wouldn't open. I can't remember all the error messages I've seen and their specific wordings. It's varied over the different OS versions.
 
My S2 still works fine, nothing here worth upgrading for.
[doublepost=1537412970][/doublepost]With the cost of these things, you'll need a good health monitor
 
I don’t think making a lot of calls on a watch is that convenient anyway.
It’s more to make quick calls rather than be a phone replacement.
Yeah but let’s say I talk for 20 min in total for the day. That would still massively reduce the battery if apples battery page is correct.

What’s the point of paying a monthly fee for cellular if it’s so limited.
 
Is the ECG function available today on the Apple Watch 4 if I have it now?

If not, when is the earliest it is functional? That is when I'd buy this watch.
 
Not that I have a problem with it but when did Apple start using reviews for marketing? Normally their products speak for themselves so they have had no need to try and prove otherwise. I'm intrigued as to why they feel they need to go this route, either that or I've missed them promoting reviews in the past.
They do it during keynotes all the time—highlighting the reviews and comments from the tech press.
 
400 bucks for a watch that can't even last for a weekend trip, no sleep tracking and no always on display....

i also like how the ny times raves about the ekg feature when they've never even used it or even know when its coming out. lol....
 
  • Like
Reactions: ani4ani
It’s the biggest leap in Apple Watch yet, however it’s not a big enough of a jump from my Series 2 to warrant an upgrade. Before Watch OS5 I was seriously going to buy one, but my series 2 runs great now.

Not really sure how big of a jump would need to be for someone to upgrade from S2 to S4! I guess it is subjective. For me is good enough to upgrade from my S3, all the new features and particularly the larger display are reason enough for me. Battery life has never been an issue for me since I place it on a dock every night before sleep, just can't sleep with the watch on my wrist. Luckily I will get 70% of what I paid for my S3 when dhe S4 arrives.
 
Many cardiologists question its accuracy. It did not get independent confirmation or approval. It's not clear how accurate the single-point measurement is, and how accurate a diagnosis its AI can make. The FDA did not approve it as a medical device, it was just "cleared" the way for sales and marketing. Since it was cleared by the FDA, it probably works as well as other single-point consumer ECG devices (no, the Apple Watch wasn't the first one). However, it was not approved by the FDA for proper medical diagnosis, which generally requires a multi-point (6-point) sensor.

One of the local heart and lung center’s where I am are not fans of any wrist-worn heart monitor devices. More times than not, they get people coming in all stressed out and worried about their health because the devices are telling them that something is wrong, and then they go and do some Googling, and start freaking out about all of the worst possible outcomes for an elevated or irregular heart rate. So, they give them a Holter monitor for the day, analyze the results, and everything is normal. Sort of drives them nuts, to the point that they don’t recommend them. They especially despise the Fitbits.

When I spoke to them about the S4 Apple Watch’s ECG capability, they were extremely sceptical about its accuracy. It seems a lot of these types of devices need to be treated with a dose of scepticism. Even those automated sphygmomanometers are known to measure higher than what the actual BP is for people. Most people don’t realize it. Of course, it’s better to be safe and get checked out, just in case, but you’d think the manufacturer’s would put more effort into improving the accuracy.
 
People need to understand that any reviews before release are because the reviewers have agreements with Apple to get early access to the device and they're therefore very keen to maintain those early access privileges. You're not going to get an unbiased review until post release from reviewers who have no relationship with Apple.

This is the first Apple Watch that looks pretty good to me, but it's still hamstrung by battery life. I'd also have liked the bezels to go even slimmer still. For such a small device/screen it needs an almost "infinity" look around the sides, even if the curvature of the glass at the edges causes distortion so the very edges aren't entirely useable, it still creates a pretty cool impression.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: belvdr and HardRain
I am not the greatest fan of Apple but I so wish this watch supported Android phones mainly because of the built in heart monitor which can detect tachycardia and bradycardia. That can be a lifesaver especially for someone like me who was born with a enlarged heart. But I need to be able to still get my text messages and text back from my watch, hopefully Samsung gets something like this for the next Galaxy watch 2. Bravo Apple......for this watch and not their phones.
 
"...features in the Series 4 make it a powerful device for overall well being that could save your life one day."

So now they're scaring us into buying their stuff....lol
Going with the "it's healthy for you, if you don't buy our stuff you could be seriously jeopardizing your health or life" is always such a noble way to market electronic gadgets.
 
ECG is the only reason I see there to upgrade

Which happens to be unavailable in the US until later and will probably never materialise at all in Europe due to strict health care laws. So the only improvement is a bigger screen and slightly improved speeds.

So in theory it's a great improvement, in practice it isn't. I also find it appalling that the current reviews wax poetic about the great new features when in reality, said features can't actually be reviewed at all as they're not here yet.
 
If you ever tried taking more than 5 minutes on the watch you’d see that it’s plenty.

Not if you use AirPods to make calls. Calling on the AW isn't convenient at all, I don't have the cellular version but I sometime answer to a call on the Watch at home. I need to have my wrist close enough to my face so after a couple of minutes I either end the call or switch to the phone.
 
I was tempted to buy the watch last year but since my original series 0 still worked, I waited. Now at 3 1/2 years old...which is nearly 100 in "smart watch" years, the battery is losing charge faster and response times are lagging, along with far more frequent freezes and lock ups. It's time...
Same for me. Another £500 gone:(
 
I concur. With WatchOS4, the watch was basically unusable (e.g. Workout app loads slugglishly)
With WatchOS5, it's buttery smooth again. I have to really test out WatchOS5 on the Series2 before jumping.

On my series 1 watchOS 5 feels slower and battery life isn't great, I love the new features but the overall experience isn't great
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.