Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Cool, but not every 6S owner is like you.
That was my point. I don't know who you mean by target upgrader. I honestly don't know who you mean. I thought these new phones every year are meant more for the people that have money to burn and enjoy Apple products.
[doublepost=1568781771][/doublepost]
You’re referring to products that came in 2014 though. That’s how long it’s been since that was an issue. The 6s and newer all run fine today with a good battery.
[doublepost=1568766381][/doublepost]

Anyone who wants a phone that is much more powerful, a massive upgrade for a camera, and huge battery life gains. They sell millions every year so there’s a target audience out there somewhere.
I don't disagree with you about there being millions of people that buy these things but that's not what "target" means, that's just an audience. The original quote from baymowe was about targeting people and I'm curious who they think the target demographic is, that's all.
 
Here’s the thing though... Early reports, reviews and comments paint the picture that the iPhone 11 series is doing well and will continue to do well. They didn’t “need” to do a redesign this year or remove the notch or add 5G.

Apple is in a very good position with not only iPhone, but their other services and hero products. Sure there’s more that they can be doing, but they’re doing pretty damn well.

I think from here on out we’ll see some great updates.
[doublepost=1568762158][/doublepost]

Exactly Lol. Just goes to show you that people generally only have high expectations and unrealistic expectations for Apple. I don’t see any of this scrutiny or criticism for other companies. It’s crazy.

Yeah Apple is doing well because of a loyal fan base and a fan base that doesn’t want to switch to a new ecosystem. I never said they didn’t make good products but at least up to the iPhone 11 the iPhone has lost market share in recent years.

Unrealistic? It’s unrealistic for them to have the same features the competitors have in earlier released products?

And you don’t see other companies get scrutinized? Are you new to this forum? I’ve seen enough Samsung and google bashing in this forum to last 10 lifetimes.
[doublepost=1568783668][/doublepost]
by the time they settled with QC there wasn't enough time to put the x20 modem into the production for iphone. hell even the x16 qualcomm chip inside the x has better coverage than the iphone 11's intel xmm 7560

Yea another good reason to not upgrade till 2020/21. I feel like 20 is going to be another S year though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TracesOfArsenic
Over the last year, once or twice, I took my XS out the case to take a peek and admire how beautiful it is. Then carefully nest it back in it’s case.
I still have a 5 on my desk that I upgraded from however many years ago. It certainly is also beautiful.

But Apple and the entire industry continually making more advanced devices year after year, and everyone marveling at each years new features, that’s even more beautiful.
Especially considering that the consumer pays less for a base iPhone 11 than the $849 for the 64GB iPhone 5.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: newyorksole
That was my point. I don't know who you mean by target upgrader. I honestly don't know who you mean. I thought these new phones every year are meant more for the people that have money to burn and enjoy Apple products.
[doublepost=1568781771][/doublepost]
I don't disagree with you about there being millions of people that buy these things but that's not what "target" means, that's just an audience. The original quote from baymowe was about targeting people and I'm curious who they think the target demographic is, that's all.

Correct, that’s what I was referring to. They are targeting people who want the things I mentioned, or the best iPhone available.
 
Usually the Verge is pretty cynical about Apple, especially when it comes to the iPhone, so it seems like they’re extending high praise for the new ‘tri-lens’ camera and improved battery life. I admit, I thought these phones would probably be underwhelming for 2019, but I think Apple made some really nice changes with the additional water resistance and lowlight/camera additions.

Dieter Bohn is more objective, Nilay Patel comes across as more of a fanboy which is fine because reviews are personal opinions. There's no denying that these iPhones will be a nice upgrade for anyone coming from iPhone 8 and below.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newyorksole
Wrong, it’s the industry we are talking about. There will be no major innovations coming out of any smartphone manufacturers short of foldable phones. You just need to learn to accept it.
It depends what you class as innovation.

We've had so many promises, delays and near misses on new battery technologies over the last decade but every one turns out to have issues somewhere (cost, ability to scale up to production volumes desired, only OK within certain temperature ranges, etc). I'm still hoping that at some point some new battery technology will deliver a step-change in charge density and be practical to manufacture affordably at high volume.

Admittedly the real source of the innovation would be within the battery manufacturer or licensed from some university research rather than within any given phone company (short of a company like Apple buying out the patents from the originator of the tech) and as such it is very possible that all flagship phone manufacturers would roll out this innovation within a few years of each other but some of these near-miss technologies have claimed up to 3 times charge density vs existing technologies in the lab; if anything like that level of improvement came to a smartphone that would in my mind be significant innovation and a step-change in the industry. I'm not holding my breath though.

To make myself insanely rich I think the one patent in the world that I would most like to own would be for some practical and affordable 3x charge density new battery chemistry. The ramifications would go far beyond smartphones (watches, headphones, laptops, cars, drones, robots, etc, etc, etc). If such a technology does emerge Apple is one of the few companies with the financial muscle to be an early adopter or even take a run at buying the company holding the patents to manufacture the technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdawgnoonan
And I question the point of a foldable phone. A foldable tablet sounds cool, but phone? Not to me. I also question if a device using foldable screen technology is actually innovative at all. The tech isn’t new. The software on the foldable device may be innovative, but I’m not sure regarding the hardware. I guess it has more point than 5G currently, and no, I don’t consider using a 5G modem to be innovative either. It is simply normal technological advancement spun by marketers. 5G isn’t innovative for Samsung now nor Apple in the future.

I guess there’s a distinction between innovation, and meaningful innovation.

I will admit that a foldable phone is clever and innovative from an engineering standpoint. Thing is - does the product result in a great experience for the end user? I personally feel that having to unfold and fold a phone every time I want to use it will quickly become more troublesome than it is worth once the initial honeymoon period wears off.

What samsung has done here is try to force-fit a use case for a product that they own (flexible displays). Rather than a company like Apple who works backwards from the desired experience.

That’s why Apple is going with AR glasses instead of foldable phones. Samsung can only double down on phones because they have close to zero wearables presence, due to them not being able to control both software and hardware. This galaxy fold is a product borne out of desperation, not a desire to advance the user experience.

Likewise, the innovation with 5g will not come from whoever is first in including those radios in their phone, but in coming up with use cases that actually utilise that much speed.

What Apple has done here is knowing precisely which areas to compromise in with their devices. Backed up with their unique software and a repertoire of services, the end result is an experience android phones will find hard to match.

That’s what I am paying for at the end of the day. Not so much raw specs but the whole Apple experience, made possible by their control over hardware, software, services.
 
Yeah Apple is doing well because of a loyal fan base and a fan base that doesn’t want to switch to a new ecosystem. I never said they didn’t make good products but at least up to the iPhone 11 the iPhone has lost market share in recent years.

Unrealistic? It’s unrealistic for them to have the same features the competitors have in earlier released products?

And you don’t see other companies get scrutinized? Are you new to this forum? I’ve seen enough Samsung and google bashing in this forum to last 10 lifetimes.
[doublepost=1568783668][/doublepost]

Yea another good reason to not upgrade till 2020/21. I feel like 20 is going to be another S year though.

You make it sound like a “loyal fan base that doesn’t want to switch” is a bad thing. Apple must be doing something well if they have such a large and loyal fan base. Also, I’m sure they pull in a bunch of non-loyal customers as well. People who aren’t sheep but just like certain Apple products.

And of course they’re going to lose market share considering they don’t have free phones or extremely low-budget phones like Samsung, LG and those other manufacturers.

A Mercedes Benz has a steering wheel, tires, seats and other basic things that Honda has, but the experiences are very different. Why? Because even though Mercedes wasn’t first to the party, they still know how to craft a great car and driving experience. Newsflash, Apple doesn’t need to be the first to the party.

Samsung and Google bashing is notttt the same as Apple bashing. I don’t see Samsung or Google users bash their devices. I do see Apple users/fanboys/“sheep” bashing Apple though. So called “fans” seem to hate Apple. I rarely see a Galaxy user say negative things about their devices.
 
Quotes like this are completely useless... Why in the world would a company like apple make such a dramatic camera change and it not be at least one of the best at the time of release? How about focus on a benefit that's actually tangible and relatable? C'mon, The Verge!
I think the best review for the new cameras is the tech crunch one, tested in a real, real world location of Disneyland day and night.
 
Is anyone thinking of going from the XS Max to the standard Pro? I’m not sure if I could go back to the smaller screen.

The reviews are impressive, I haven’t seen reviews like this for an iPhone for years now. Excited to pick up a Pro next month when I’m eligible for Jump! with T-Mobile.
[doublepost=1568811936][/doublepost]
Keeping my X for another year, blew me away all the corporate fanboys touting the new WiFi standard. The Elephant in the room is 5G. Next year should be a real barn burner.

Most people understand that 5G won’t be widespread next year, so it will be a useless feature.

US telecom companies have programs that allow you to upgrade yearly, and this finally a big jump, unlike last year.

Also, it seems like a lot of people here do the same as me: upgrade and hand down last year’s model to a family member.
 
The Verge and more specifically Nilay Patel's reviews of Apple devices are pointless and hold as much value as a strainer holds water. Like with most major outlets who review Apple products, they are less credible because they won't give a "truly" honest review. While Apple will never pay for a good review, they do something that is far more evil, but less egregious, they stop inviting said reviewer or press outlet to their keynotes.

You talk bad about Apple, you don't get invited back. Simple as that. So no major outlet will risk losing that invite and thus every iPhone/Apple product typically won't be reviewed for anything less than a 9 or something similar on a different grading scale.

Despite the camera's, Nilay doesn't bring up the fact that the hardware is NOT all new as Tim Cook called it on stage. It has a new camera model and color/treatment. The phone's hardware design is virtually the same. The front still has the notch, from a year-old iPhone X, i.e. this is the third year Apple is passing off the same basic design (minus camera module changes). The display is mediocre compared to Samsungs's or even the OnePlus 7 Pro, with a 6.6"- damn near 4K display with over 3000pixel or 517ppi, compared to Apple's 458 and smaller 6.5". OP also has an integrated fingerprint scanner, 90hz refresh, several color modes including "wide gamut." Etc, etc.

As an Apple fan, I just wish reviews would call out Apple on their nickel and dime updates, because Apple won't listen to its customers, but if trade outlets, reviewers, bloggers, etc, finally called out their BS and lack of innovation and really held their @$$es to the fire, about how they leave out features intentionally, don't update their UI appearance, pass the same design off 3 years in a row, PERHAPS, Apple may be forced to do something innovative instead of falling behind.

The last "great" iPhone, was the iPhone 4, for me. It had an amazing design, it was sturdy and industrial, had that smooth glossy glass on the back, a metal band holding it all together and it just felt great. It introduced front-facing cameras to the larger audience (I know Motorola had one first). It was a forwarding thinking device and it ushered in the era of high-pixel density displays... it was a product Jobs was proud of and Ive design to perfection. Imagine that exact design, with a truly edge-to-edge display (aka no notch).

Sorry for my rant, I'm just tired of seeing Apple slow drip features and pump out stagnant and multi-year old designs for massive profit margins while Samsung and the Chinese Market leapfrog them.
 
? Best camera. Did you read the Verge, or just complain about the quote? This author (unlike others at the Verge) went in to quite a bit of detail about why he claimed it as the best camera, including with side by side comparisons. He even pointed out the conditions when the camera was bested by the Pixel or the Note 10. Particularly well done explanation about the AI processes and some of the deficiencies in the current release of iOS 13 and what is expected to change in a further update.

I can understand you may have a different opinion, so we all await your more thorough analysis and review
Maybe, but they made a graphical image with that quote. My point was that the quote they selected for the image is expected and uninspired. That's it.
 
Because I want the camera upgrades, better battery life, etc. But I'll go to the store first and play around with it.

If you're upgrading from an 8 or older you'll probably be pretty impressed. If you've got an x or xs, I'd wait. USB C and better modems next year. Having to only pack 1 cable for your laptop, ipad and phone will be a game changer. Of course you're free to do as you like, but honest opinion just wait for the better phone that's coming. They did this with the earpods too. Released an incremental upgrade for the version 2 then BAM! Out comes the beats version which out performs and has a lot of what people were looking for in a seconds version of the earpods. If you've got an x or xs, wait on this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.