Like you were in the market in the first place.I'll buy a new iPhone when they get rid off the stupid and ugly notch.
Like you were in the market in the first place.I'll buy a new iPhone when they get rid off the stupid and ugly notch.
While geeks who hang out on tech forums have fun comparing and analyzing specs, most users don’t. Even so, many, many tech-savvy customers will buy the XR, precisely because they know 828 vs. 1080 lines of vertical resolution is not a meaningful difference. The 6/6S/7/8 have 750p displays and are well known to be of extremely good quality.
You are wasting your lifetime...
The XR has bezels. Larger ones than any phone for the same price, and many cheaper ones. That's all.
But maybe Phil has decided that 79% is "full screen enough" and people can't notice the massive black borders.
I can do it. I can even do it on my 7 Plus and I don’t have the biggest hands. Now I’ll admit that I sometimes get cramps after using the 7 Plus one handed too much. The iPhone X on the other hand was as comfortable as the non Plus phones whenever I’ve had one in my hand. Everyone’s hands are different though so I probably shouldn’t generalize.
The only reason that actually matters with the 2nd lens is portrait mode; which they found another way to do and it’s a better quality picture on the XR for portrait shots because it’s not shooting on the 2X Sensor. The only “caveat” is no portrait on non-humans and that’s something they could actually do with software. Pixel does it already so it’s not the camera, it’s Apple’s programming.
I take lots of pics of my dog too. And a few of them in Portrait but it’s something they can add in hardware so I hope Apple adds it. I got my Xr case in and I really like the size.I consider that a pretty big caveat because I've used portrait mode on my X countless times over the year and only with my dogs. But I'll probably go for it anyway and hope a software update will add non-human figures since other phones can do it.
That's exactly my point – no one was calling 8/8 Plus affordable and now suddenly everyone is calling the XR a "low-cost affordable iPhone". That's how they slowly shift the meaning of these words.The iPhone 8/8 Plus was affordable at $699/$799, but the XR at $749 isn’t?
You’re over-generalizing. “Everyone” isn’t saying the same thing, let alone calling the XR a “low-cost affordable iPhone”, and the meaning of the words isn’t shifting, slowly or otherwise. Few are calling the XR low-cost, as far as I see.That's exactly my point – no one was calling 8/8 Plus affordable and now suddenly everyone is calling the XR a "low-cost affordable iPhone". That's how they slowly shift the meaning of these words.