Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Highlights Photos Shot on iPhone XR
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Ah, the photography debate. I'm reminded of people who spend lots of money on golf clubs. Doesn't mean they can hit the ball straight, but they are confident in their equipment. Likewise, straight hitters could benefit from even better clubs...
If you're a pro, you're most likely not using an iPhone for professional work. If you're a consumer, the iPhone is probably the best camera you've ever owned. Use the right tool for the job -- and learn how to use that tool -- and you'll get great results.
If you're a pro, you're most likely not using an iPhone for professional work. If you're a consumer, the iPhone is probably the best camera you've ever owned. Use the right tool for the job -- and learn how to use that tool -- and you'll get great results.
Yet, the Pixel 3 is even better.
I've grown tired of camera postings. This game is over. Mobile phones = commodity good.
As someone who takes photography seriously, I have found that all camera's I've owned have limitations - even my Arca-Swiss 4x5. It's just a matter of understanding what they are. At the end of the day, any so-called "best" cameras do not compensate for poor technique, lack of imagination, lack of understanding of light, etc. when trying to make good photographs.
My various iPhone cams have worked well for me over the years and have used them in several projects.
Niederhorn mountain between Thun and Interlaken, Switzerland.
Whoa. Steady on there, cowboy!
-The Portrait mode for humans for the XR is better than both the Pixel and XS.
Personally, I find the human portraits of the Pixel for daytime a bit too sharp and contrasty. While the XS a little soft. The XR sits in the middle and is the best with its wider angle in my opinion.
-AND don't forget that Pixel doesn't do bokeh in real time. Only after the fact. Unlike the XR and XS.
-the XR can't do objects in portrait and while the XS is good with objects, the Pixel is better.
-Pixel front facing camera is def better. It's wide angle selfie lens is a winner.
-Zoom on the XS is better than Pixel which does a good job with digi zoom but still not as good. XR doesn't compete.
-Night time shots on the pixel can be better, but in some comparisons the XR/XS comes out on top in side by side photos.
-Day time the XR/XS is better by a little over the Pixel.
-Pixel has that new night mode thingy which under the right conditions works well.
- As for video. Don't even bother with the Pixel. It's bloody awful. The XS is amazing and the XR is identical save for a missing 4k 60fps setting and zoom IIRC.
-Sound recording is far superior on the iPhones as well.
You can already take similar low light pics using apps like Hydra (other work too). Not need to wait a few generations. I think Google's implementation is better than Hydra (but you'd expect that). But yes I would like the feature baked into the stock camera.
Hydra dev: https://twitter.com/rsebbe/status/1054666630511411200?s=21
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/hydra-amazing-photography/id947824428?mt=8
Agree, and when publishing an article like this, at least compare this XR software Bokeh to the “real” thing in the XS(Max). Now it seems Apple selectively informed its premium customers, at the time the new XS features got advertised (that were mainly camera-oriented) while they held the XR up their sleeves
How come Apple always highlights these amazing photos "shot on iPhone" for at least the past few generations and they all look equally as good. Seriously. Shouldn't they look better with each generation? I sure don't see a difference.
Also, why is it that every time I try to take a picture that is not outdoors in ideal lighting conditions, the photos are 90% of the time blurry?
Also, why is it that every time I try to take a picture that is not outdoors in ideal lighting conditions, the photos are 90% of the time blurry?
Well said. It's awesome for photography in general that we are now nitpicking photos that come off a small slab you keep in your pocket. It wasn't that long ago that phone cameras or even quality point and shoots were just not very good. Now we have people arguing about saturation or hard to see artifacts. This is a huge win in my book.
I do wonder sometimes if 'pros' are annoyed that an average Joe can pull out their phone and get 80%+ of the way there now. Until recently bokeh was reserved for those with a DSLR for example. A good photographer is a good photographer regardless of the camera. It's no longer easy to fake it by just having some expensive gear.
I have an iphone X and my wife just got the XS. The XS is far superior. It makes the X look outdated already.
Because it does some kind of post blur of a flat image.
There is no background visible behind the girl, so it is blurring her face
and pasting a layer of her sharp over itself. A very typical post-blur effect.
Last edited:
If it makes zero sense, why are so many social media photos blurry? Almost all caused by a dirty lens. Easy to forget.
Same here. If there were an option to remove the noise reduction that seems to aggressively happen in current iPhone shots, I’d be really really happy.
With 12.1, you can preview/adjust the depth of field in real time in portrait mode, at least with the XS.
Yeah, sometimes the fake bokeh affect is very obvious, but sometimes it works well and it becomes clear how good smartphone cameras are for point and shoot scenarios. I shot these with my 2 years old 7 Plus with no editing. The top one is the State Capital in Sacramento, CA shot early in the morning, and the second is using the Portrait Mode out in Lake Tahoe.