That's true, just saying these people have a right to be upset.Agreed. But suing for $5M, that's ridiculous.
That's true, just saying these people have a right to be upset.Agreed. But suing for $5M, that's ridiculous.
Who uses safari in landscape more than a few seconds?Do me a favor. Open safari, use it in landscape, and tell me if you see a wifi or cellular signal in the status bar. The answer is you don't because apple hides the status bar in landscape. So unless you're using it in portrait, the cellular signal doesn't appear.
Who uses safari in landscape more than a few seconds?
Exactly true. Sue the carriers, they should turn off data when you reach your limit. Force people to say yes or no to further data use.Why don't we just address the root issue- carriers that still charge for overages?
Looks like another greedy lawyer trying to cash in...
Uh yes we have...and because my wife is the saver of the family she constantly monitors our data use. 1 week after installing iOS 9 we burned thru 15 gigs of data. Because she's a stay at home mom who teaches home-school she uses her phone constantly to AirPlay videos to the TV in our homeschool room. We also live on a farm with a broadband connection that frequently chokes. Until now we've just worked around it. She had no idea the feature was turned on we've now been charged twice for additional data. It's cost us an extra $30 in just one month. Because we were not notified of this feature and that it would be turned on without our consent Apple is responsible for the extra $30. Simple as that. Love Apple, but they should have seen this coming.You haven't even seen your first bill yet to know if this is actually going to be a problem. Lawyers need to chill with these easy paychecks, but the U.S. Justice Department is the enabler that keeps them coming back for more.
You are mistaken. It's an optional feature AFTER you figure out its on. My wife homeschools our children and never once noticed her phone switching from wifi to cellular. We now have a huge overage bill. Explain how she would have known? She's owned every iPhone since the 3G and never once had to watch the signal indicator like a hawk. Apple turns this on without telling her.There are legitimate lawsuits.
This is not.
This is an OPTIONAL feature.
The Wifi icon goes away when you're on cellular. It's not like you don't realize you're using it.
Nothing but greedy lawyers trying to make a buck.
I would. In my opinion Antennagate, bendgazi, etc we all pretty much complete ********, but this, this is stupid on Apple's part. They created a feature that doesn't work properly, can cost people actual money, and enabled it by default.Who puts up a lawsuit over that, honestly?
The "Phillips & Phillips" legal firm perhaps? Really tho.....Who puts up a lawsuit over that, honestly?
Even though ads can be annoying, either way we pay. Also, believe it or not, there are apparently countries where people pay radio/tv taxes.Internet should be free. Like radio! I mean we already get ads up the ass everywhere.
Imagine a world where Internet was free? Or our taxes paid for Internet?
If you're streaming a movie or playing a game the user is not aware of the signal usage change.i have an ample amount of data to consume monthly, people with 2gig a month can find themselves chewing through data quickly.Not exactly true. As stated in the Apples document the cellular data signal appears when it makes the switch. Not seeing how its really all that different for folks other than "assisting" during any moment. Currently (before iOS9) you are somewhere doing something and the wifi sux so you disconnect it (or it gets so bad it does it for you) and you keep doing whatever it was you were doing. Lets be realistic here, I am sure most folks with a smart phone didnt get it to make phone calls. Just some BS law suit for the lawyers and the today's society of entitlement wanting some of Apples cash.
If you think you're on WIFI you're not checking. Sure its optional but turned on by default and with no warning from Apple. Even I dont know all the IOS9 settings. And I am a savvy user.
Yes, there is no way the incurred 5 Mil or damages, but I am sure the asked "Saul" and he set the number.
Companies need to error on the side of caution. This feature should be off by default. Apple made the call and customers choose to sue because of it. Apple only has themselves to blame.
So before iOS9 (and this feature) what would you do if you were on crappy wifi and it disconnected? I recall there were numerous threads of wifi issues and disconnects in previous iOS versions and getting disconnected from wifi was very common. Just curious.Even if it's in the foreground, I could be on a image intensive website in safari and use over 100 MB of data without realizing it, especially if my phone is in landscape mode which hides the status bar indicator.
You are mistaken. It's an optional feature AFTER you figure out its on. My wife homeschools our children and never once noticed her phone switching from wifi to cellular. We now have a huge overage bill. Explain how she would have known? She's owned every iPhone since the 3G and never once had to watch the signal indicator like a hawk. Apple turns this on without telling her.
Your wireless carrier didn't text you when you were near your plan limit??
I'm no defender of Apple but this is dumb. You can see if you are on WiFi while using the phone, ignorance is not excuse. I'm sure my cell provider would credit me for any overage if this happened to me once, just give them a call and get a credit. There is nothing more annoying than walking near a McDonald's and my phone stops working, I have to disable WiFi and then remember to turn it back on. This feature is great, if it's to confusing it my be best to not have a data plan.
I was thinking more along the lines of what T-Mobile does- throttling you to 3G speeds instead of charging you for overages. You still get relatively useful speeds for most purposes, and for no extra cost.Exactly true. Sue the carriers, they should turn off data when you reach your limit. Force people to say yes or no to further data use.
Who puts up a lawsuit over that, honestly?