Apple Hit with 'Planned Obsolescence' Lawsuit in Brazil over Fourth-Generation iPad

[GermanyChris]

No. I don't think Apple should be responsible for anything. Ever. They are perfect in all ways. Is that better?

Here, drink the milk

 

[BaldiMac]

No. I don't think Apple should be responsible for anything. Ever. They are perfect in all ways. Is that better?

No.

 

[AppleScruff1]

No.

I never said Apple should be held liable. I simply said that there may be some merit to the case. Or maybe there isn't.

 

[maxosx]

So much ignorance in this thread.

True.

Insecurity, ignorance, fear uncertainty & doubt.

 

[BaldiMac]

I never said Apple should be held liable. I simply said that there may be some merit to the case. Or maybe there isn't.

Okay, I'll rephrase.

Why do you think that there may be some merit to the case because of signs in a third-party retailer?

 

[AppleScruff1]

Okay, I'll rephrase.

Why do you think that there may be some merit to the case because of signs in a third-party retailer?

I don't know all the details of the case. Someone from Brazil brought up in this thread that people were knowingly mislead, hence my comment.

 

[gnasher729]

New to me means unused in an unopened package.

You'll probably find "new" stuff according to that definition in a pyramid in Egypt.

 

[BaldiMac]

I don't know all the details of the case. Someone from Brazil brought up in this thread that people were knowingly mislead, hence my comment.

Why are you avoiding the question? brdeveloper brought up a claim that there was no indication that the iPad 3 was not the newest iPad in some third-party retail stores. Why do you think there may be some merit to a case against Apple based on that claim?