I'm guessing that many people who hated Beats headphones will suddenly find them to be audiophile quality. 
Cook's fall has begun, beats are the most overrated product I've ever OWNED, the *curación* of they radio listing aren't just better than most crowd sourced listing available so why pay 3.2 billion on the biggest vaporware brand in the US?
For one Apple is not in the audiophile market. Beats may make mediocre products according to many here, but to the rest of the market out there they make a desirable product. And for all we know Apple might take the technology and improve on it. It will not be the first time they have done that (mainly in the software space though).
In addition in terms of business it makes more sense, because Bose, B&W etc have other product lines (speakers), which would be less complementary to Apple's business. Beats is only headphones and some connected portable speakers. It would fit nicely to the rest of Apples product portfolio.
I'm guessing that many people who hated Beats headphones will suddenly find them to be audiophile quality.![]()
Beats they are the best in their industry they command a whopping 60% of the market share. Are they the best headphones no. They are what they are and they market their product accordingly they do not claim to be a audiophile brand. Beats takes most of the profits and industry sounds familiar why wouldn't they work together?
I find this move to be like swilling vinegar. First off I grew up in a family of sound engineers, Ive worked in audio, in different facets. Beats and most headphones are really bad. Beats is a marketing brand, and Iovine is a genius for pulling the greatest hustle in business ever. Beats will benefit Apple zero, Apple will benefit Beats massively. Also their horrific pay app apparently is the reason the went for Beats. Honestly I find this retarded, and Dre's video with Tyrese claiming it as juvenile and dumb as spending 3.2 bil on headphones that sound worse than the garbage ear buds Apple offers with its devices.
I wish MS, or Google or some other company was making a good alternative to OSX and iOS because Id go there. Problem is they dont.
God I miss Jobs
I have to say i agree with you. I don't know what all the negativity with Beats is all about, i understand the audiophile's chipping in, but what you must understand is that the average consumer is not an audiophile. I was a little cautious about buying Beats headphones a few years back, but i took the plunge and brought some Solo HD's that were on sale here in the UK. I have used them everyday, they have superb sound quality and are very durable, i use them at home, on the bus and out in public. I listen to all kinds of different music, and so far i have not heard a song that has sounded rubbish on them.
Apple buying Beats is probably going to be for the streaming service, i have to admit that i was surprised when i heard about this, but hey it's Apple they have surprised us in the past![]()
On this forum which means absolutely nothing. Meanwhile in the real world millions of people think They are awesome, so that's puts u in the minority. I have the beats studio and the B&W P3 both have excellent build quality but B&Ws sound better.You sir are in the minority. They are not durable. Made in china crap.
Apples ROI on From Beats will be quick.We have a winner!
Apple are hoping to get a good amount of money from the cash cow before it dries up and/or another musician lends his name to a product and people buy in.
Apple's position right now is such that as long as things are just 'good enough', they'll keep hold of customers. It's only when customers have reason to try alternatives that things will slip.
A 19 year old hip-hop fan won't give Sennheiser a chance, even though they're miles better and miles cheaper, much like most iPhone owners I know have never tried an Android device.
Apples ROI on From Beats will be quick.
Sennheiser is better but not miles better, I've seen plenty of kids on the train with multiple brands of headphones. As for iOS users trying out Android I don't see the point. For what most people do on their smartphones either OS will do. Why would a iOS user give up the Apple ecosystem that they are most likely heavily invested in.
Please remember a little thing called: Patents
lol, Beats has no worthwhile patents. they're Beats.
To be more specific the build quality is awesome but the speakers of crap. It would not take much to audiophile quality parts into beats.So this has people talking about how crappy the Beats are and they are crap lets be honest. But than people come and say how much better Bose or JBL are lol. Seriously people Bose is just as crap. You want serious headphones get Sennheiser or Beyerdynamics.
On the streaming side of this purchase I think they may have made a good choice. They can just rebrand it and use it within in iTunes. But I absolutely agree with most people here that the Beats are crap.
To be more specific the build quality is awesome but the speakers of crap. It would not take much to audiophile quality parts into beats.
This isn't about the money, Apple makes $3.2 billion cash in 5 weeks time. It's about the hit to their image.
Disney bought LucasFilm for $4 billion.
Disney bought Marvel for $4 billion.
Apple bought Beats for $3.2 billion.
Yes, teaming up with a company that owns 70% of the $100+ headphone market and is endorsed by artists from every genre will definitely destroy the Apple image.
On this forum which means absolutely nothing. Meanwhile in the real world millions of people think They are awesome, so that's puts u in the minority. I have the beats studio and the B&W P3 both have excellent build quality but B&Ws sound better.
What market? You mean the over priced under achieving getto fabulous headphone market. It might be working in States but it surely ain't global phenomenon.