This Siri, this Apple company just gets worse and worse. They could not even integrate ChatGPT or make Siri useful and dependable after a decade of leadership in personal assistance capabilities. Pathetic.iPhone slowly becoming Android
This Siri, this Apple company just gets worse and worse. They could not even integrate ChatGPT or make Siri useful and dependable after a decade of leadership in personal assistance capabilities. Pathetic.iPhone slowly becoming Android
Nope.Money maker for who?
Apple needs Google here, not the other way around.
Under Cook APPL stock is their most important product.How does a company sitting on a trillion dollars of cash fall so far behind in the AI race? Genuine question. Did everything go into that absolute FLOP of a product known as Vision Pro?
I can remember back to when Apple was a multi Trillion dollar company.My how Apple has fallen....
That's Apple Intelligence. We STILL do not have what we were promised. Unreal Apple, unreal.
This isn’t as much about the provider as it is their models are beginning to diversify and be stronger with different use cases. That specialization will continue, leaving some generic models for general consumption like chat and others deeper in specific disciplines such as scientific modeling or IaaS. What is happening right now is an open api system is being developed to enable agentic AI. This will allow the functionality described earlier in this thread by name99 which was an excellent post. I completely disagree with him on Apple’s strategic position in this though because Apple will fall on their sword before they embrace open systems of any kind (think blue bubbles) as its not only an aberration to the core identity of the company, it’s antithetical to their business model.I’d much rather the user gets to choose the provider here. Maybe some want google? Maybe some want ChatGPT? Maybe others want to run their own?
In the end, they are going to sell us and our data out for a deal with one provider. Leaves us stuck with who they choose. So tired of the hostility towards users from all these tech companies - Apple included.
I wouldn't be surprised if some government in the future forced apple and other companies to do just that, if apple doesn't do it on their own.Give us a choice ....
All it would take is some branding advertising and people would get it.A name that isn't easy to read.
Apple Intelligence will never be able to stand on its own, they neglected research for too long and now they have accumulated a technological gap that will never be filled, especially considering the few employees having some knowledge in the topic are being poached by other companies. That being said grok and musk are toxic at this point, Apple should stay clear.Does Tim Cook really hate Elon so much that’s he’d rather partner with the tech devil than temporarily lean on Grok until Apple Intelligence can stand on its own? 🤔
Does Tim Cook really hate Elon so much that’s he’d rather partner with the tech devil than temporarily lean on Grok until Apple Intelligence can stand on its own? 🤔
By calling it simply “Gemini”, it will do so many things for their users, Google will drop AI terminology, personifying its marketing and features. Just ask Gemini. Same for Siri, the use of terminologies like AI and artificial intelligence won’t be needed. Better to start off as they mean to go on.All it would take is some branding advertising and people would get it.
That’s the Copland moment all over again - the tiny difference is that Apple doesn’t have SJ anymore.That's Apple Intelligence. We STILL do not have what we were promised. Unreal Apple, unreal.