Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
this is complete and utter bantha poodoo!

nothing in our dma says apple can't bring it to our markets in the way they've announced it at wwdc in fact I would say and hazzard a guess with them offering an external ai processor from the start, in this case OpenAI's ChatGPT, it is already in complete compliance with the spirit of the DMA. Add to that the fact they spent a long time going on about their private cloud compute and then I assume it's also in compliance of GDPR and even goes beyond what GDPR stipulates.

So, this is just Apple being spiteful for their other troubles with eu lawmakers, the spotify case and the epic thing....

I think it's more like — EU brought the tat, Apple brought the tit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevez67
You had your vote less than two weeks ago. Or did you forget?

Also, this is completely on Apple. They’re just being childish. First claim how amazing and private their AI is, and then not be able to release it in the EU due to privacy concerns? That’s a joke.
One has to wonder what privacy they are bragging about. Or Apple twists the meaning of “privacy” based on where their products are being sold? So all the privacy marketing is just a you know what I mean?
 
Again - McDonalds having a monopoly for Big Mac customers doesn't mean they have a hamburger monopoly. The EU isn't coming in to say "McDonalds has a monopoly on Big Mac customers so McDonalds has to let Burger King set up shop inside McDonalds stores."
  • McDonald's doesn't have the power to deny hamburger creators access to 50% of the hamburger market.
  • McDonald's users have much lower costs of switching to Burger King (or someone else) than iOS/iPhone users.
  • McDonald's users don't spend hundreds of dollars to commit to McDonald's before their first hamburger purchase.
  • McDonald's users don't spend hours to set up and learn how to eat their burgers best - and have to relearn/get accustomed to Burger King, if they were to switch.
  • It doesn't cost investments into the billions of dollars to set up a competing shop and compete with McDonald's or Burger King for hamburgers.
In others words: McDonald's isn't Apple, their restaurants aren't iOS, their ordering desks aren't App Stores and their hamburgers aren't mobile applications.

It McDonald's and Burger King commanded a similar market power and market concentration for meat and veggies stuffed into bread rolls as Apple/Google for mobile application, government regulation on hamburger sales would be long overdue.
 
Getting testy in the Apple-sphere between folks who've long been friends!
I think maybe Gruber has been just a teeny bit influenced by his cozy access with Apple execs the last few years

Screenshot 2024-06-21 at 1.30.02 PM.png
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Beyo and boss.king
Apple today said that European customers will not get access to the Apple Intelligence, iPhone Mirroring, and SharePlay Screen Sharing features that are coming to the iPhone, iPad, and Mac this September due to regulatory issues related to the Digital Markets Act.
Not a big deal, really!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: wilhoitm
There is no duopoly. These apps are available on many other operating systems besides Android and iOS.

Spotify is even available on the Xbox.
Hmmm, never knew Spotify had their own operating system and smartphone.
 
In the EU customers will turn to Android… Trust me, we really are not attached to the iPhone as people in the US are. People here think iMessage is like SMS so they think it costs money. We text, call, etc. on WhatsApp and FB Messenger.
100% true. I don't know any iPhone user that uses iMessage, FaceTime etc. Not sure why you've received so many downvotes. Never met any iPhone user that'd use Messages or FaceTime.
 
Hmmm, never knew Spotify had their own operating system and smartphone.

You never knew Spotify is available outside of iOS and Android? And Windows is even bigger than iOS where Spotify is also available.

So there is no duopoly between iOS and Android when it comes services like Spotify.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexMac89
IOS has only 23-27% marketshare in the EU.
Maybe on users / installations - but not on revenue.
They earn and control most of the money made by digital transactions on smartphones.
They have a majority market share on revenue, as we both agree.

I have no idea why you think that's "changing my position."
It contradicts your characterising Apple "a minority player", and your constant remarks about them only having about 25% market share are disingenuous in my opinion.

You're labelling them a 25% minority player when it suits you (arguing about government intervention).
Yet when what seems to be a developer cites Apple restrictions as reason why he/she won't develop for iOS, you counter by asserting that most money is made on iOS.

👉 You're changing your position on what's market share and what's minority/majority as it suits you.
 
Last edited:
How is Apple supposed to implement iPhone mirroring without letting any other company have access to core APIs that would allow this sort of interaction? That would violate the DMA

How is Apple supposed to implement Apple Intelligence without giving third party AI programs the same core OS access that Apple Intelligence will have? (Chat GPT does not have that same access, it will be more akin to a wrapper that Siri will pass requests to)

This was something people were screaming out when the DMA was being debated. And now it's happening

God forbid someone be allowed to mirror their iPhone with a Windows machine, right? Then people will have one less reason to buy a Mac...the horror...
 
You never knew Spotify is available outside iOS and Android? And Windows is even bigger than iOS where Spotify is also available.

So there is no duopoly between iOS and Android when it comes to Spotify.
Oh ok I’m so out of touch then. Wonder which device support Spotify’s own operating system.
 
I figured this was going to happen to Apple Intelligence but iPhone Mirroring, really? 😵‍💫 I was looking forward to tha

For this Apple would have to be deemed a gatekeeper of screen mirroring no? Just like Messages is not part of their DMA issues
They probably don’t want to roll it out just to get fined 10% of their worldwide revenue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agsystems
It’s sad. But also not really: AI is English only for the foreseeable future, and for the vast majority of EU citizens, English is not their first language. And changing between languages on Siri is a major pain.
Apple is missing many languages spoken in the EU such as some of the Finno Ugric and Baltic languages, while Microsoft and Google has those languages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hagar
Maybe on users / installations - but not on revenue.
They earn and control most of the money made by digital transactions on smartphones.
They have a majority market share on revenue, as we both agree.


It contradicts your characterising Apple "a minority player", and your constant remarks about them only having about 25% market share are disingenuous in my opinion.

You're labelling them a 25% minority player when it suits you (arguing about government intervention).
Yet when what seems to be a developer cites Apple restrictions as reason why he/she won't develop for iOS, you counter by asserting that most money is made on iOS.
Because monopoly power isn't determined by revenue. I'm not shifting or changing anything.
 
God forbid someone be allowed to mirror their iPhone with a Windows machine, right? Then people will have one less reason to buy a Mac...the horror...
I don’t want to allow Windows machines complete access, including remote control, to my iPhone.

The way this “mirroring” feature was shown to work, you can directly control your iPhone while it is locked.
 
It contradicts your characterising Apple "a minority player", and your constant remarks about them only having about 25% market share are disingenuous in my opinion.
In fact, I am unsure if those folks truly understand the meaning of the word “monopoly” here. I for one don’t really know what counts as monopoly in the legal context, but market share alone doesn’t seem to be enough to define.
 
I don’t want to allow Windows machines complete access, including remote control, to my iPhone.

The way this “mirroring” feature was shown to work, you can directly control your iPhone while it is locked.
Then just limit it to macOS only. No harms done.
 
I don’t want to allow Windows machines complete access, including remote control, to my iPhone.

The way this “mirroring” feature was shown to work, you can directly control your iPhone while it is locked.

Well there's a function I won't miss. If this mirroring only works with private APIs that only Apple can access because otherwise they would present a security risk then they sound insecure by design.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Stevez67
In fact, I am unsure if those folks truly understand the meaning of the word “monopoly” here. I for one don’t really know what counts as monopoly in the legal context, but market share alone doesn’t seem to be enough to define.
Well...here's a clue for you. The EU invented the term "Gatekeeper" because they know that Apple is not a monopoly.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.