Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How is Apple supposed to implement iPhone mirroring without letting any other company have access to core APIs that would allow this sort of interaction? That would violate the DMA

How is Apple supposed to implement Apple Intelligence without giving third party AI programs the same core OS access that Apple Intelligence will have? (Chat GPT does not have that same access, it will be more akin to a wrapper that Siri will pass requests to)

This was something people were screaming out when the DMA was being debated. And now it's happening
Damn, that's perfectly valid reason
 
How is Apple supposed to implement iPhone mirroring without letting any other company have access to core APIs that would allow this sort of interaction? That would violate the DMA

How is Apple supposed to implement Apple Intelligence without giving third party AI programs the same core OS access that Apple Intelligence will have? (Chat GPT does not have that same access, it will be more akin to a wrapper that Siri will pass requests to)

This was something people were screaming out when the DMA was being debated. And now it's happening

For this Apple would have to be deemed a gatekeeper of screen mirroring no? Just like Messages is not part of their DMA issues
 
How is Apple supposed to implement iPhone mirroring without letting any other company have access to core APIs that would allow this sort of interaction? That would violate the DMA

How is Apple supposed to implement Apple Intelligence without giving third party AI programs the same core OS access that Apple Intelligence will have? (Chat GPT does not have that same access, it will be more akin to a wrapper that Siri will pass requests to)

This was something people were screaming out when the DMA was being debated. And now it's happening
This is what happens when you pass excessive regulations/overreaching laws.
 
How is Apple supposed to implement iPhone mirroring without letting any other company have access to core APIs that would allow this sort of interaction? That would violate the DMA

How is Apple supposed to implement Apple Intelligence without giving third party AI programs the same core OS access that Apple Intelligence will have? (Chat GPT does not have that same access, it will be more akin to a wrapper that Siri will pass requests to)

This was something people were screaming out when the DMA was being debated. And now it's happening
Given that not all countries allow encryption to be used, one would suspect Apple Intelligence can't be used for all situations. Likely some features would generate problems with particular countries technology rules of use, and take time to work around their laws/rules to the point they need to be disabled for some countries.

look at this map


Apple has long championed on-device processing as the cornerstone for the security and privacy of user data. Data that exists only on user devices is by definition disaggregated and not subject to any centralized point of attack. When Apple is responsible for user data in the cloud, we protect it with state-of-the-art security in our services — and for the most sensitive data, we believe end-to-end encryption is our most powerful defense. For cloud services where end-to-end encryption is not appropriate, we strive to process user data ephemerally or under uncorrelated randomized identifiers that obscure the user’s identity.

Secure and private AI processing in the cloud poses a formidable new challenge. Powerful AI hardware in the data center can fulfill a user’s request with large, complex machine learning models — but it requires unencrypted access to the user's request and accompanying personal data. That precludes the use of end-to-end encryption, so cloud AI applications have to date employed traditional approaches to cloud security. Such approaches present a few key challenges:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
Is this how they decided to deal with that $1.8b fine?

Considering that one could mirror iPhones for, like, ages using QuickTime, how does the new feature even relate to DMA?

They haven’t added anything substantially new anyway and AI chatbots are already installable from AppStore. Lack of iOS 18 “innovation” is not the thing to cry about for EU users
They are appealing the fine and just like most of the other fines they had it will probably get reduced or tossed.
 
People in EU be like:
IMG_9022.jpeg
 
this is complete and utter bantha poodoo!

nothing in our dma says apple can't bring it to our markets in the way they've announced it at wwdc in fact I would say and hazzard a guess with them offering an external ai processor from the start, in this case OpenAI's ChatGPT, it is already in complete compliance with the spirit of the DMA. Add to that the fact they spent a long time going on about their private cloud compute and then I assume it's also in compliance of GDPR and even goes beyond what GDPR stipulates.

So, this is just Apple being spiteful for their other troubles with eu lawmakers, the spotify case and the epic thing....

Maybe. Though Margrethe Vestager has built her entire career on being spiteful toward American tech companies so I'd argue it's just desserts.

That being said, I think your DMA analysis is wrong. I almost guarantee Vestager would find that Apple only allowing ChatGPT integration runs afoul of the DMA's equal-access provisions. And even if not, the DMA is both very complicated and incredibly vague, and the EC has proven to be quite arbitrary and capricious in its interpretation of the rules, so I don't blame Apple at all for taking extra time for legal review.
 
this is complete and utter bantha poodoo!

nothing in our dma says apple can't bring it to our markets in the way they've announced it at wwdc in fact I would say and hazzard a guess with them offering an external ai processor from the start, in this case OpenAI's ChatGPT, it is already in complete compliance with the spirit of the DMA. Add to that the fact they spent a long time going on about their private cloud compute and then I assume it's also in compliance of GDPR and even goes beyond what GDPR stipulates.

So, this is just Apple being spiteful for their other troubles with eu lawmakers, the spotify case and the epic thing....

Wouldn’t Apple have to implement iPhone Mirroring across non-Apple devices as well? Ditto for SharePlay Screen Sharing?

Also, wouldn’t Apple have to allow any third party app to mirror whatever it wants, without using iPhone Mirroring? Ditto for SharePlay?

Also, wouldn’t Apple have to allow third party hardware, to mirror on the Mac using the iPhone Mirroring protocols? Ditto for SharePly?
 
Last edited:
This is Apple, perhaps in a subtle way attempting to get their customers to turn on the regulators in the EU. Ha ha. Or maybe they don’t want to be forced to create android mirroring on the Mac desktop.

Those are actually the exact same conclusions I came to. It might be a bit of both.
 
How is Apple supposed to implement iPhone mirroring without letting any other company have access to core APIs that would allow this sort of interaction? That would violate the DMA

How is Apple supposed to implement Apple Intelligence without giving third party AI programs the same core OS access that Apple Intelligence will have? (Chat GPT does not have that same access, it will be more akin to a wrapper that Siri will pass requests to)

This was something people were screaming out when the DMA was being debated. And now it's happening
Why do things like Handoff, Continuity Camera, etc. work in the EU then? These don't have all of those core APIs available either.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.