Clearly he does. Apple AI is OpenAi. It's LITERALLY ChatGPT in your phone, doing dumb things Apple thinks it can allow you to do, like create a barfing unicorn with a poop emoji hat. Oh wait. Does it do that yet or is it in TBR limbo as well?lol. Tell us you don’t understand Apple Intelligence without, whatever. Clearly you don’t.![]()
Macrumors when Apple rushes stuff: torches and pitchforks.
Macrumors when Apple takes their time for stuff: torches and pitchforks.
I would strongly prefer they take their time on this AI stuff.
I would prefer they stopped ********ting us about AI, since the most common use of AI, chatGPT and image generation can be done in a web browser and would be based on the very same OpenAI techn anyway.Macrumors when Apple rushes stuff: torches and pitchforks.
Macrumors when Apple takes their time for stuff: torches and pitchforks.
I would strongly prefer they take their time on this AI stuff.
I don’t think anyone ever wanted an Apple car and Apple seems to be strongest when it produces personal computing products.That’s actually one of the things he should be lauded for.
True if Apple had given a preview of their approach to private ai and said that it’s launching across 2025-26 and that they’ll take their time as they want to be thoughtful and deliberate & they’ll provide updates nearer the launch rollout, that would’ve been better.I don't think it is at all right to imply this is just the usual Apple bashing, whatever they do... This entire release has been and continues to be a humiliating farce and in my opinion justifies completely the high degree of criticism it gets on this and other sites and online reviews etc.
Sure they should take their time and get stuff right. So maybe they should have looked to introduce this with iOS 19 or iOS 20 instead of rushing it through to try to bolster the sales of iPhone 16.
I don’t think anyone ever wanted an Apple car and Apple seems to be strongest when it produces personal computing products.
The error I think was in starting this project in the first place.
Software engineers that don’t know how to code.It is shocking that Apple, one of the richest companies on the planet, can't get it together. Seriously, whats is the issue?
Absolutely hilarious how inept Apple is. Tim has been awful let’s be honest. He walked into a company that could not fail for a very long time no matter who was in charge.
He purchased Beats for billions of dollars which was to this day the worst purchase Apple has ever made by far. They could have made a streaming music service for less than 100 million. I personally would have bought Pandora because to this day it is still by far the best streaming music service because they actually understand radio algorithmic playlists. Their music selections are so vastly superior.
He then gave the okay for multiple products that were insanely niche and made no sense given Apple’s entire mantra ‘We only want to make a few products, and only what we could affect real positive change to’. They made HomePod which was the exact opposite of what people were buying Alexa Echo devices for. People wanted something insanely cheap with a voice assistant that wasn’t Siri garbage.
Then they made AirPods Max which are $550 headphones that virtually no one would buy because negligible audio enhancement is not worth that much. Then you have the fact that AirPods Max of course only work on extremely few devices. Like imagine not having dongles for AirPods Max so they could function well for video games for the PS5 and Xbox. Just embarrassing.
Then they made Vision Pro which they thought would be a good idea at $3,500. They actually thought that this device that is the exact same thing as an iPhone and a Mac display was going to be bought for $3,500. Try again at $1,000 and you might get a few purchasers but not many because an iPhone is still needed no matter what, and the vast majority won’t be buying a headset that does nothing different hahah.
They released the iPhone 16 devices with the camera capture button and I WOULD ABSOLUTELY PAY TO SEE THE ANALYTICAL DATA on that lmfao. You know how many people use that? It’s guaranteed sub 1% of iPhone 16 owners. It’s the biggest piece of garbage gimmick since peek and pop and Dynamic Island.
Now they went down the AI road making the most useless AI stuff imaginable. Genmoji LOL. And their writing tools don’t even work lmao. I tried a simple proofreading task and it just said ‘error completing task’ or something like that. It’s totally useless.
Hell, I would settle for existing features that work smoothly and intuitively. Functionality that we come in contact with frequently has degraded over time and some of us really miss the old “it just works” way Apple used to develop features. A few examples I’ve encountered:I would prefer they stopped ********ting us about AI, since the most common use of AI, chatGPT and image generation can be done in a web browser and would be based on the very same OpenAI techn anyway.
I'd trade vaporware gimmicks I'll never use that they're trying to force-feed me, for core hardware features that I will definitely use and actually want.
Apple is turning to **** because it's run by bean counters.
Is Apple just incapable of doing anything these days, except with chips? It feels like by the time they get Siri to work, it will be completely left in the dust by competitors. In fact, it already it pretty much irrelevant.
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman last month reported that Apple was considering delaying at least some of its promised Apple Intelligence enhancements for Siri until iOS 18.5, and that plan appears increasingly likely based on his latest information.
![]()
Gurman said Apple was initially planning to launch the Apple Intelligence enhancements for Siri in iOS 18.4, but it seems that the features have been pushed back until iOS 18.5 due to a lack of readiness and software bugs. Accordingly, none of the promised features are available in the first beta of iOS 18.4 released last month.
In his Power On newsletter today, he said the features will be available in iOS 18.5:Apple's software engineers have been internally testing iOS 18.5 since at least the start of February, according to the MacRumors visitor logs.
Gurman expects iOS 18.5 to be released in May, but beta testing should begin sooner:It is still possible that some of the Siri upgrades could arrive in a later iOS 18.4 beta, but Gurman seems to be leaning into iOS 18.5 timing for now.
The upgrades coming to Siri will include on-screen awareness, understanding of a user's personal context, and deeper per-app controls. For example, during its WWDC 2024 keynote, Apple showed an iPhone user asking Siri about their mother's flight and lunch reservation plans based on info from the Mail and Messages apps.
Apple Intelligence requires an iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro Max, or any iPhone 16 model.
Article Link: Apple Intelligence Upgrades for Siri Likely Pushed Back to iOS 18.5
When was the last time the main feature of a software version was released only after the release of the next version of the same software?Eh, the modular approach to software and rolling out certain features over time was embraced by the entire industry a long time ago. It's not anything new or unusual.
Clearly he does. Apple AI is OpenAi. It's LITERALLY ChatGPT in your phone, doing dumb things Apple thinks it can allow you to do, like create a barfing unicorn with a poop emoji hat. Oh wait. Does it do that yet or is it in TBR limbo as well?
It is also shocking that Gurman has this much detail about this part of Apple’s software stack, but was only aware of the existence of “Invites” mere days before it was released.
Totally agree, it's sad but make sense. You cannot go to the investors and say that iOS 19 will be only focused in "bug fixes and performance improvements", you need to market it with something more. And I think they are running out of ideas and when you are out of ideas you start creating solutions to problems that does not exist.It's not that Apple are inept or incompetent. It's not that Tim Cook is an idiot.
They just measure success from the shareholder's perspective now and not the customer's interests. It feels like Apple's self-evaluation begins and ends with product margins and earnings per share, which are absolutely market-leading. It takes brilliance and hard work to maximize those measures and Apple is one of the most successful companies ever at doing both.
Sadly, it's not a long-term strategy and now we're really beginning to feel the results of those priorities. This is what happens when you value the supply chain over the engineering.
I get the impression that senior management at Apple think that they're absolutely crushing it right now, which is a big part of the problem.