Because if Apple intelligence was originally meant for iOS 18 then it would have launched when the iPhone 16’s were launched & not on 18.1 releaseHow do you explain DeepSeek? That disproved the idea that LLM AI programs were difficult or time consuming to produce.
Those are the kinds of things that were in the first Siri public demo video about 15 years ago, before Apple bought Siri:...during its WWDC 2024 keynote, Apple showed an iPhone user asking Siri about their mother's flight and lunch reservation plans based on info from the Mail and Messages apps.
OK, but did you want those things more than you might have wanted a capable AI personal assistant?Why is image playground embarrassing? It’s really cute. What you say nobody wanted that you would be wrong. I wanted it, I wanted genmoji. And I’m not the only one.
The op originally said: “ nobody wanted image playground etc”. It’s true I never asked Apple for that type of functionality. But that doesn’t mean I find it useless like op implied.OK, but did you want those things more than you might have wanted a capable AI personal assistant?
I think it was just to show that Apple could at least deliver something before iOS 19 and next the iPhone, but agree with you, Image Playground was fun for a couple hours. Meanwhile the battle continues with an incapable Siri.OK, but did you want those things more than you might have wanted a capable AI personal assistant?
Sure, I barely use Siri either, if at all, but that might be because most of what Apple's been promising hasn't been delivered, so there's not much there to use, and of those parts of Siri that Apple has actually released, too much of it works poorly, intermittently, or not at all. If Siri was able to do now what Apple's been promising for about 15 years, then more people would be using it, maybe me too.The op originally said: “ nobody wanted image playground etc”. It’s true I never asked Apple for that type of functionality. But that doesn’t mean I find it useless like op implied.
I barely use Siri or any other digital assistant, so I really didn’t care if apple made it better or not. Granted I’m one person, but we each have our lists of things.
I understand why image playground and genmoji were done first. Those are quick (relatively) hits that draw people in. In the same way Memoji was available with Face ID. It’s a showcase for the technology.Sure, I barely use Siri either, if at all, but that might be because most of what Apple's been promising hasn't been delivered, so there's not much there to use, and of those parts of Siri that Apple has actually released, too much of it works poorly, intermittently, or not at all. If Siri was able to do now what Apple's been promising for about 15 years, then more people would be using it, maybe me too.
But the issue is a matter of resource allocation at Apple, regarding what would make the Apple ecosystem more useful on a faster timeframe than what they've been on. Genmoji and Image Playground could have been made lesser priorities compared to better implementing Siri's core functionality, after which Genmoji and Image Playground could have been released. As it is, it seems like releasing those things first was sort of like throwing a bone to try to keep the dogs away.
People here have overwhelmingly said they don’t want Apple AI on their phones. Multiple times. What’s funny is they’re now taking Apple to task for not having it fully in place when the most recent iPhones were launched.OK, but did you want those things more than you might have wanted a capable AI personal assistant?
Time for people to leave Apple for Google then of people are truly unhappyJust embarrassing.
Time for people to leave Apple for Google then of people are truly unhappy
They should’ve been sued for the ads. They ran ads for the phone before absolutely any AI features were added. Absolutely none came until 18.1 at least. That’s false advertising.I can’t think of another recent iOS update where the main feature was delayed the entire year; yet still heavily promoted in ads from launch day. Apple needs to really learn from this.
I wouldn't be sure about that.Time for people to leave Apple for Google then of people are truly unhappy
Yes, Apple has been resting on their laurels for so long. All the people saying iOS doesn't need more than 6 GB RAM are sure quiet today.Thats the Price for sleeping too long and then rushing on AI. I dont like the Update policy they are doing with iOS18. All feauters should be availlable from the beginning. Not pice for pice in every Point Update. In my opinion this all AI stuff should be pushed until iOS 19 so we could get all in One. But it is what it is.
The issue is, getting a reliable, fully functioning, private and largely on device model is REALLY hard. The other companies that are doing this are using online LLMs that get dumped large quantities of private information to analyse.It is shocking that Apple, one of the richest companies on the planet, can't get it together. Seriously, whats is the issue?
The issue is, getting a reliable, fully functioning, private and largely on device model is REALLY hard. The other companies that are doing this are using online LLMs that get dumped large quantities of private information to analyse.
Doing this on device, and with apples decades long and proven approach of doing it the right way, even if it’s not as ‘good’, takes time to perfect.
Don’t like it, go buy from another company!
I trust apple to do what is right. Because they have demonstrated, for decades, that this is their driving force.