$175 is unrealistic for the feature set that most desire. Once apple makes the move to the cloud with their NC data center, memory will become a thing of the past.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple iPad Pre-Orders to Begin February 25th? Speculation about Other Features?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
$175 is unrealistic for the feature set that most desire. Once apple makes the move to the cloud with their NC data center, memory will become a thing of the past.
You're right. I had that backward. And that's probably part of Apple's strategy. See if they sell at the higher price and cut it down immediately if they don't.
Still, I think the pure shock value of selling it for $299 right off the bat would have generated so much excitement, it would have guaranteed a smash hit. As it is, we'll see. I'm guessing it's going to be a tepid response, maybe a million in the first month.
Nope. Sorry to burst your bubble, but no way.
I use the RDC app on the iPhone to connect to my employer's network and do sysadmin type things when it's required, but let me tell you, it's a pain in the ass. It's great when I'm on the road without a computer and get a call for something I can fix quickly, but it's not something I'd want to spend a lot of time in.
Here's the main problem: you're using a touch-based device to manipulate a device that requires a dedicated keyboard and mouse. Think about that for a while. It doesn't take much to figure out how that quickly becomes a nuisance. ("I need to hold down the apple+option key." "I need to right-click.") Remote access on a touch device is good for quick access and small jobs, but nobody is going to work that way.
I really hope this is right..... In the past if you pre-ordered a product from apple online did you have it at your house on the day it launched in stores?
I don't use my cell phone much at all, totaling just a handful of hours over the course of a month. As currently offered by AT&T, owning an iPhone would be just ridiculously overpriced for someone like me. We (my wife, my daughter, and I) are currently using a family cellular plan from T-Mobile that costs us a total of $75/month, and we don't even push the limits for that.
Now if the iPhone comes to T-Mobile, and they will sell it like they do the Nexus (meaning I can get it no matter what plan I'm on), I may very well get the iPhone in that case. I would have no objections to paying for a monthly 3G data plan, because I'd probably use it. But I don't want to be required to couple that data plan with a very expensive calling plan which I'm just flat out not going to need.
That's how it's worked for the past several pre-orders: 1G iPhone, 3GS iPhone, & Snow Leopard. I'd imagine they'd offer the same for the iPad.
As a Linux admin, I don't share your pain on this. My main problem with the SSH app I use on my iPod Touch is the screen is too small for a decent xterm-ish window, even taking pinch/zoom into account - so something like "top" is a bit of a pain. But aside from that (and the iPad will address that shortcoming obviously), running a shell session from my Touch works remarkably well - and on Linux most everything is done from the command line, not a GUI.
I have a bunch of pdfs I have to read, and I can't wait to be able to do that on my new 3G iPad. I hate printing out hundreds of pages, and sitting at a laptop for hours on end reading is really uncomfortable. As much as I'm looking forward to the iPad for GPS, Internet, Email, and so on, what I'm most excited about is the eReader functionality. iDisk plus 3G makes the iPad the perfect eReader wherever I'm at.
I agree that in the future we will eliminate such abstraction, but in my humble opinion, a touch screen won't replace a mouse any time soon, if ever.
You are making the assumption that everybody else thinks like you. Technical skills are not relevant (in the way you present your argument at least). Computers are used for a lot of things, in fact, they are used for virtually everything. The problem that I see is that the iPad is a solution only for a small subset of those things; mainly web browsing and entertainment. The iPad is not even marketed as a desktop replacement.
I'm sure a writer won't trade his notebook to write on a iPad (although you could use the external keyboard). I'm sure a researcher would have problems dealing with the lack of multi tasking. I know I wouldn't be able to program IN an iPad.
Apple? Try Google and Amazon and whoever came with the idea of cloud storage first. (I love Dropbox btw.)
I have no intention of syncing my music collection to my iPad- that's what streaming apps like Simplify are for (granted, you'd need the 3G iPad to really be able to take advantage of that most of the time). But I'd rather use the gigabytes on my iPhone or iPod to store music- seems like a waste of space to duplicate them yet again on the iPad. But with that said, i think 32 gb is more realistic in terms of space for what I plan to do with my iPad.
This is something that I've been think a lot. Is there a solution that would let me stream my library to my iPad and let me browse the web or do other tasks?
The solution i'm talking about, Simplify, doesn't run in the background as it's just a regular iPhone app (but it does pretty nicely let you play any non-DRM music from iTunes from your home mac).
But- there might be some way to do http streaming of songs from iTunes library and have that play from Safari on your iPhone, which would be able to play in the background. But i don't know if there is a really polished way to do that...
You are right that the iPad is mainly for entertainment and web browsing. But those two functions are something that EVERYONE uses. Writers, engineers, programmers, researchers -- they all have specific requirements that utilize specialized tools. For that, desktops/laptops would remain the prefered computing device for the immediate future. But when those people with their specialized computing requirements want to relax after work, an iPad would be perfect for that. At the same time, the iPad could be a primary computer for someone who only does chats, emails and web surfing, for whom a full computer is overkill. So I believe it's a device that can be enjoyed by a wide range of people, both tecchies and non-tecchies. And I don't think the fact that the iPad is not, and wasn't meant to be, a full computer or a desktop replacement is a problem. I think its strength will be that it does a few things, but does them very well.
i hope for apple's sake it's Flash, otherwise there's just simply no point.
*sigh* / *shakes head*
Maybe Apple will be really generous and offer, for a small fee that is, a touch friendly version of SL that is able to run you favorite Apple software. At least that is what I am hoping for.
I use SSH extensively too (it's every bit as useful for Macs as for Linux--just wish Windows would catch up already) but I was speaking in terms of the typical iPad user which is what the author speculated about in the article. I don't think people will be remote desktop type connections on iPads will be a killer feature. It's just not a good fit. Instead, I think we'll see more and more touchscreen versions of applications like we saw in the iWork demo.
I don't remember what the component costs were exactly, but it was somewhere in the mid to high 200s for the 16GB version which sells for $499. There is absolutely no way on the face of the planet that Apple could sell a machine with component costs of mid-to-high 200s for $299. The cost we're looking at is just direct materials. That's only a small fraction of the total cost of the machine. There is labour costs, shipping costs, recouping R&D costs, package, selling and administration costs, and manufacturing overhead costs. Then there's the cost of warranty, etc. Just because something costs $260 or w/e Apple can't sell it at $299 and say we made $40 on this thing. Does not work that way. If a 16GB costs $260 in components, there is probably at least another $100-150 of other costs to close the margin. Realistically, Apple won't have more than 10-15% NET margin on these things. Of course that could dramatically increase for the 64GB models (I'm not sure).
Our company is over 750 people currently using only Windows based PC's. Most all of the partners started using iPhones. Now those same people are interested in the iPad. IT is going to buy about a dozen of em to see how they work out. Believe me, our IT department is about as far from being Apple fanboys as anybody can be. And I'm guessing this won't be a unique situation...Say hello to the new Apple TV. Only Mac fan-boys will buy
It is. A great thing is that there's the iWork suite, that's really why I'm buying the iPad.
Ipod Touch XXL orTV Slim?
*yawn* Waiting for Rev 2.
No its just a big iPhone for Shaq