~Shard~ said:
If you think that Wall Street predictions are supposed to somehow be magically accurate, you're in for a shock - the "oracles" of Wall Street aren't as all-knowing as you might think. Apple would be foolhardy to try and match whatever numbers come out of Wall Street, "just because they say so". As
Sayer said, welcome to the world of self-fulfilling prophecies...
Thanks for forcing me to be more exact.
Clearly, wall street has no crystal ball. They've got some tools and some math, and can figure out some things, but at the bottom is people, who just don't conform to numbers much.
Hence, what I was trying to say is-when the majority of wall street predicts it, and it's RIGHT, then it looks like they've got a pretty good system for that particular situation, rather than just dumb luck. If wall street can predict it, then apple had better be able to, because it has more and better data, and it's fortunes depend upon it doing so.
Therefore, I read this to mean that apple failed to predict demand sufficiently, but might have been able to had they been a bit more savvy.
And, as stated the first time, predicting demand poorly is a serious problem for a buisness, so I read this as bad news, because they were able to make a hit darned well, but not able to figure out how much of a hit it would be, and will loose possible money because of it.
That said, they're capitalizing big time by selling in apple stores, where they sell at wholesale instead of retail, get the money off of accessories, and most of all, get to push macs and associate macs with ipods. Which is typical of apple. They like "risky" products but hedge their bets by underproducing and keeping unchanged products around for a long time as a matter of practice (so if something is a bust they still sell what they've made at a profit, just stop making them and take a while to deplete stock). Likewise with things like introducing products before they ship, etc.