Rainbow Apple vs. mono-color
Originally posted by gopher
That's true to a point. As a rainbow colored Apple they were very well recognized. Now that they have decided to stick to the logo but do many different two color or shades of gray for the logo, I've had a few customers who think the logo on their Panther startup screen is an orange!
I have no idea why our society has taken the rainbow color to mean gay. The rainbow color can also be symbolic as a unifier of people, much like the rainbow coalition. I really think that Apple should return to its roots and use the rainbow color again. At least when they edited the 1984 commercial to include the iPod on her waist they didn't change the color at the end of the commercial of the Apple logo in the 1984 commercial.
A study just last year concluded that world-wide, Apple's logo was the #2 most recognizable, behind Coca-Cola. And it's been many years since Apple dropped the rainbow treatment (I don't remember exactly when it was -- does anybody know for sure?).
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so here's mine: The rainbow treatment was fine for its time, but Apple was smart to change it when they did. The mono-color treatment gives Apple so much more flexibility than the rainbow allowed. And while it's unlikely that reduced printing costs were a primary motivation for the change, I'm sure it was considered a bonus.
Honestly, I don't see how the rainbow treatment would help the apple be more recognizable as an apple (instead of an orange). I don't recall the last time I saw a rainbow-colored apple in real life. To me, the simpler treatment focuses attention on the shape, making the apple
more recognizable, not less.
I loved the original logo -- our family had an Apple ][ back in '77, then a Lisa, then Macs -- and I didn't like it when Apple changed it, but as a designer, I've come to appreciate their rationale.
Again, just my opinion . . .