Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Absolutely frivolous lawsuit. LOL

You don't like Apple Devices or iOS 7 - go get an android. You have options...

This is almost as stupid as the lady that sued McDonalds because her coffee was hot and she got burned from it. lmao

And this is why I go to Starbucks, you can ask them to lower the temperature of your coffee. :D

----------

Of course... If iOS 7 runs slow on iPhone 5S and iPhone 5C...then iOS 7 is really that bad....

But it doesn't. I have a 5s and it's a lot smoother than iOS 6 on the iPhone 5. I'm assuming you switched to Nexus after 7.1 was released though, so you probably didn't see the improvements.
 
My friends friends has a 4s and I was actually impressed on the speed of that thing. It was so cute on that tiny screen haha

But again...just because someone had good impression about a software, does not really mean iOS 7 is good. It is certainly true other way around. The main problem here is if iOS 7 update cause all the problems people facing.

I am sure all software update will cause problem for many people. But software developer need to take action when problem arise, but just saying it is normal for software cause problem.

----------

And this is why I go to Starbucks, you can ask them to lower the temperature of your coffee. :D

----------



But it doesn't. I have a 5s and it's a lot smoother than iOS 6 on the iPhone 5. I'm assuming you switched to Nexus after 7.1 was released though, so you probably didn't see the improvements.

No...I switch to Nexus long time ago..but I still have tons of iPad and iPod at my hand, I see the improvement. However, I am just making a statement saying IF iOS 7 runs slow on newer hardware, then iOS 7 is bad.
 
This is almost as stupid as the lady that sued McDonalds because her coffee was hot and she got burned from it. lmao

You do realize the only people who thought that the suit was stupid were the giant media corporations who were pushing for tort reform, right? Anyone who bothered to read the case facts would know that the 80 year old woman was only asking for a hundred thousand(ish) to cover her hospital bills. The millions she got from McDonalds were because the jury was pissed, because that was the 3rd or so time something like that happened, and McDonalds didn't care. But since you're not a stupid idiot, you knew all that already, right?
 
Wifi and Bluetooth failures are not a "feature" of IOS 7 and aren't restricted to it either, it's something that happens sometimes due to the update process where the hardware was already defective - new software, drivers and functionality sometimes pushes those already faulty parts over the edge. It happened with 6 and probably every other update before that, but the cases are rare because those hardware failures are rare.

Yes newer more complex software sometimes runs slower on older hardware. This is also a longstanding thing and not in any way exclusive to IOS 7.

This isn't the first class action suit some enterprising lawyer has tried to drum up over an IOS product or update either. They see some complaints in the forums, get dollar signs in front of their eyes, and because they're all blinkered by greed and a lack of any technical understanding of the subject they imagine that this is enough to make them big bucks. The cases are then invariably thrown out of court for being the morally vacant nonsense that they are.
 
I can see the value of class actions in some very rare cases and even then, only the lawyers benefit. This though is ridiculous, and while I am not a law expert, I can see this getting tossed fairly quickly.
 
:rolleyes:I hope the people who is suing not only lose the case but have to pay a hefty fine for being idiots.

It cost like $150 to file. The lawyers are either working Pro Bono or no win no fee. In America you don't get penalised if you lose a case like this.
 
Yes newer more complex software sometimes runs slower on older hardware. This is also a longstanding thing and not in any way exclusive to IOS 7.

I just want to point out that this isn't really accurate anymore. Android has gotten faster with every version, as has Windows Phone and even Windows. In fact, the only OS's that seem to get slower with each revision (and require a hardware upgrade to be usable) are iOS and OS X.
 
Yes newer more complex software sometimes runs slower on older hardware. This is also a longstanding thing and not in any way exclusive to IOS 7.

This is not entirely true anymore. It used to be as software advancing, it became more and more bloated and require better hardware to run. But it is not entirely true anymore... Android 4.4.2 KitKat runs better in older hardware, Windows 8 runs computer Windows Vista runs. All these companies takes time optimizing their software runs better on older hardware, it seems only Apple making older hardware runs at unacceptable on not so old hardware.

----------

Yeah. Class action for iOS 7? Are you kidding me right now? Because there are no other more PRESSING issues in the world as of now. None. I hope one day all this BS ends. :confused::(

What absolutely pressing issue? North Korean launching missile? Ukraine is in civil war mode? Obama care is not working? Or you simply think anyone suing Apple for anything is stupid...because there are more pressing things to do. Heck... Why Apple does not take their money spent on law suits to make iOS 7 runs better, so they can avoid this stupid lawsuit all together?
 
if whoever is suing apple for iOS 7 should definitely switch to android... those guys support their phones like crazy, even Google allows old nexus phones to upgrade...


*oh wait
 
I just want to point out that this isn't really accurate anymore. Android has gotten faster with every version, as has Windows Phone and even Windows. In fact, the only OS's that seem to get slower with each revision (and require a hardware upgrade to be usable) are iOS and OS X.

That's because newer iterations of Android don't run on anything older than a year or so.

And I wouldn't say Windows Phone is completely devoid of this - my 520 (a cheap phone) doesn't run any "faster" on 8.1. Heck, maybe I say it feels slower.

This is all so subjective and stupid its not even funny. The "fail rate" for iOS 7 is less than 1% most likely.

I'm sorry, but I fail to see any merit in someone saying "I have a 4 year old iPhone and am pissed because it got the latest version of iOS and it runs slowly (compared to what, I have no idea)."

Guess what, devices don't last forever. You could leave it on the same OS software and it would still have more problems the longer you went. I'm not saying I'd be against letting users downgrade, though I get why they don't (ease of servicing - you think there wouldn't be backlash if they let people downgrade but said they wouldn't service said devices?).

Again - you aren't forced to upgrade (a service outage isn't a forced upgrade - no one has any proof Apple deliberately killed FaceTime for iOS 6 users....and to be honest, it'd be ludicrous). You agree to Apple's TOS multiple times before upgrading. There is no case here.

Those of you having problems - do a fresh restore. If you're still having problems, get a new phone. Lots of cheap options out there (even iPhones).

We've gone from paying hundreds of dollars for a new OS update (Windows) to complaining about our free annual updates coming to our 4 year old smartphones and making them "slow".

----------

This is not entirely true anymore. It used to be as software advancing, it became more and more bloated and require better hardware to run. But it is not entirely true anymore... Android 4.4.2 KitKat runs better in older hardware, Windows 8 runs computer Windows Vista runs. All these companies takes time optimizing their software runs better on older hardware, it seems only Apple making older hardware runs at unacceptable on not so old hardware.


(1) Windows updates aren't free. They also run on much more powerful hardware to begin with. (A 4 year old PC is still quite a bit more powerful than any smartphone)

(2) What is the oldest device 4.4.2 runs on? A year? 2 years at most? Google has done a great job optimizing Android for new devices and its far from the bloated mess it once was - but they in no way optimize it for older devices because older devices never see these updates. Apple is the only company that pushes OS updates to 3 generations.

Here's the solution - Apple should stop allowing that 3rd generation to upgrade. They're trying to do something nice (and heck, it's not like iOS 7 wasn't the biggest update to iOS since 2007) but consumers are idiots.

Lets see how you jack knobs like it when the 5 doesn't get iOS 8 next year. Oh, that's right, you'll all complain. Sorry - you can't have brand new software (with more advanced features) run as well on 4 year old devices as it does on brand new devices.
 
(1) Windows updates aren't free. They also run on much more powerful hardware to begin with. (A 4 year old PC is still quite a bit more powerful than any smartphone)

(2) What is the oldest device 4.4.2 runs on? A year? 2 years at most? Google has done a great job optimizing Android for new devices and its far from the bloated mess it once was - but they in no way optimize it for older devices because older devices never see these updates. Apple is the only company that pushes OS updates to 3 generations.

Here's the solution - Apple should stop allowing that 3rd generation to upgrade. They're trying to do something nice (and heck, it's not like iOS 7 wasn't the biggest update to iOS since 2007) but consumers are idiots.

Lets see how you jack knobs like it when the 5 doesn't get iOS 8 next year. Oh, that's right, you'll all complain. Sorry - you can't have brand new software (with more advanced features) run as well on 4 year old devices as it does on brand new devices.

1. Free is not excuse for running slow on older hardware. Also, Windows is much more heavy compare with any smartphone OS. So, here is the parallel comparison: Microsoft is making Windows run much more efficiently on older hardware for Windows, even they lowered hardware requirement over times. Then Apple CAN make iOS runs better on its older hardware.

2. Android 4.2.2 KitKat can run anything around 512MB RAM... That means you can install KitKat on older Nexus one. Around time where iPhone 4 released. There are ROM available for Nexus one if you wish to install.

3. You make sounds like people only complain when Apple does not offer upgrade to their older phone. That is absolutely not true. There are lots of people complain their Android phone not getting the update.

4. No one is asking a freaking new OS runs as it does on brand new device. They just want their phone ********* working at acceptable speed. Why this is so freaking hard to understand? One side, you guys saying new OS will run slower on your older devices, on other side, you guys don't want people to downgrade. So, WTF!
 
That's because newer iterations of Android don't run on anything older than a year or so.

And I wouldn't say Windows Phone is completely devoid of this - my 520 (a cheap phone) doesn't run any "faster" on 8.1. Heck, maybe I say it feels slower.

This is all so subjective and stupid its not even funny. The "fail rate" for iOS 7 is less than 1% most likely.

I'm sorry, but I fail to see any merit in someone saying "I have a 4 year old iPhone and am pissed because it got the latest version of iOS and it runs slowly (compared to what, I have no idea)."

Guess what, devices don't last forever. You could leave it on the same OS software and it would still have more problems the longer you went. I'm not saying I'd be against letting users downgrade, though I get why they don't (ease of servicing - you think there wouldn't be backlash if they let people downgrade but said they wouldn't service said devices?).

Again - you aren't forced to upgrade (a service outage isn't a forced upgrade - no one has any proof Apple deliberately killed FaceTime for iOS 6 users....and to be honest, it'd be ludicrous). You agree to Apple's TOS multiple times before upgrading. There is no case here.

Those of you having problems - do a fresh restore. If you're still having problems, get a new phone. Lots of cheap options out there (even iPhones).

We've gone from paying hundreds of dollars for a new OS update (Windows) to complaining about our free annual updates coming to our 4 year old smartphones and making them "slow".


1. Samsung Galaxy S4 gets KitKat update, HTC one gets KitKat update, Moto X and Moto G get KitKat update, All nexus phone gets update beyond your 1 year claim. So your claim is absolutely not true.

2. Lots of people claiming Windows Phone 8.1 runs faster on their devices and Windows Phone 8.1 is on beta. Remember how iOS 7 beta runs like crap before beta 4?

3. Windows update aren't always few hundreds of dollars. You can get Windows update for less than 50 dollars and free is not excuse for software being slow
 
And because it is free and optional to upgrade (written on my iOS 6 iPad 2).

While true, there is still a forced download of iOS 7 lacking the ability to delete it.


Absolutely frivolous lawsuit. LOL

You don't like Apple Devices or iOS 7 - go get an android. You have options...

This is almost as stupid as the lady that sued McDonalds because her coffee was hot and she got burned from it. lmao
The McDonalds case was far from 'stupid'

article-2470792-18E445A000000578-7_634x369.jpg


Yeah. That coffee isn't too hot.
 
A good outcome to a case like this is allowing users to downgrade if they so choose. Same go's for apps.


A terrible idea that would degrade and fragment the whole ecosystem and work out badly for everybody. Bear in mind that downgrading is highly unlikely to fix anyone's wifi etc - those are hardware faults at the end of the day.
 
1. Samsung Galaxy S4 gets KitKat update, HTC one gets KitKat update, Moto X and Moto G get KitKat update, All nexus phone gets update beyond your 1 year claim. So your claim is absolutely not true.

2. Lots of people claiming Windows Phone 8.1 runs faster on their devices and Windows Phone 8.1 is on beta. Remember how iOS 7 beta runs like crap before beta 4?

3. Windows update aren't always few hundreds of dollars. You can get Windows update for less than 50 dollars and free is not excuse for software being slow

(1) Ok - so two year old devices. Great. How long did people have to wait? We're not talking about rooting here - that's an entirely different demographic that wouldn't be on an iPhone anyways.

(2) So? That's my point - I used 7.0 beta on a 4S for quite a while and didn't have all the issues people here seem to be having. Certainly nothing to sue over. And that was a beta. Are you saying my claims are less valid than someone else's? My point is - they are baseless claims. What is that person comparing to? Their device on iOS 6 last week? Their device on iOS 6 when it was first released? What's the baseline? Comparing the performance change in iOS 5 > iOS 6 vs iOS 6 > iOS 7 doesn't work either - its not an apples to apples comparison. A lot more has changed in iOS 7 - which means it'll take longer to get the bugs fixed. 7.1 is already great on plenty of devices - those with 5's and 4S's included.

(3) I'm saying they used to cost lots of money - now we bellyache about free stuff. People's perceptions and sense of entitlement is absurd. Its also baffling just how clueless people are about technology. I get it - its with us all the time and we want it to work all the time. I've gotten frustrated with every piece of technology in my life at one point or another. Nothing works 100% of the time - and to sue because of that is idiotic. Especially when we're talking a legacy device (almost - in another few months, they won't sell the 4S anymore) which is able to run 2013 software. It may be "slower" compared to newer devices - heck it may even be slower than iOS 6 (though I saw no evidence of that even on the beta I used), but if you're so concerned with speed, I'd suggest upgrading.

I have people all around me on 4S's and 5's (work upgrades them every two years and they got caught at the end of the cycle) - their phones have the same issues they had before iOS 7. Devices degrade over time. ALL devices do. So you take a degrading device (that's getting slower no matter what) and put brand new software on it with more features - and you complain about it being slow.....:confused:

----------

A terrible idea that would degrade and fragment the whole ecosystem and work out badly for everybody. Bear in mind that downgrading is highly unlikely to fix anyone's wifi etc - those are hardware faults at the end of the day.

:eek:

You mean iOS 6 wouldn't solve ALL the problems iPhone 4S users face?!?!?!?!

No. Way.

:rolleyes:
 
Yeah. Class action for iOS 7? Are you kidding me right now? Because there are no other more PRESSING issues in the world as of now. None. I hope one day all this BS ends. :confused::(
Why are we even on this site then? There's nothing important here compared to much more important world problems--what's the point of spending any time here at all? :rolleyes:

----------

if whoever is suing apple for iOS 7 should definitely switch to android... those guys support their phones like crazy, even Google allows old nexus phones to upgrade...


*oh wait
It seems like the point is pretty much the opposite of that--users want to be able to stay with whatever version they had when they got the phone, for example, and have it work the way it did when they chose to get the phone based on how it worked at the time.
 
The only winners are the lawyers.
While in an overly generalized sense true, if something like this actually goes through, depending on the result, there might be something that Apple would need to adjust either as to how it provides updates to break issues it caused in earlier versions, and/or something in the TOS, etc.
 
That's because newer iterations of Android don't run on anything older than a year or so.

False.

And I wouldn't say Windows Phone is completely devoid of this - my 520 (a cheap phone) doesn't run any "faster" on 8.1. Heck, maybe I say it feels slower.
It's also in beta. Wait for the release, and if you still can't tell if it's slower or not, I think you'll have proved my point.

This is all so subjective and stupid its not even funny. The "fail rate" for iOS 7 is less than 1% most likely.

I'm sorry, but I fail to see any merit in someone saying "I have a 4 year old iPhone and am pissed because it got the latest version of iOS and it runs slowly (compared to what, I have no idea)."

I'm only talking about the 4s, as that's what I have experience with. It's not a 4 year old phone, and in fact was being sold just a year ago.

Guess what, devices don't last forever.
But there's no need to artificially limit them either.
You could leave it on the same OS software and it would still have more problems the longer you went.
Yes, but not because the software magically broke after a certain date. You would have issue related to services changing their API's, or hardware problems.

I'm not saying I'd be against letting users downgrade, though I get why they don't (ease of servicing - you think there wouldn't be backlash if they let people downgrade but said they wouldn't service said devices?).
Why wouldn't they service a downgraded device? I can install Mavericks or Windows 8, and then revert to Lion or Windows 7 and still get service.

Again - you aren't forced to upgrade.
Actually, it's practically an auto-update if you let it. There's an update that nags you and the one time you accidentally hit "okay", it's all over.

(a service outage isn't a forced upgrade - no one has any proof Apple deliberately killed FaceTime for iOS 6 users....and to be honest, it'd be ludicrous)
It wasn't a service outage, it was an expired certificate. That's an easy fix. The fact that Apple isn't fixing it for iOS 6 users is what's ludicrous.

You agree to Apple's TOS multiple times before upgrading. There is no case here.
TOS haven't been tested in court yet.

Those of you having problems - do a fresh restore. If you're still having problems, get a new phone. Lots of cheap options out there (even iPhones).
What do you think I've been dealing with, with my girlfriend? She's done 2 DFU restores, a restore or three from iCloud, and a "basic" restore over the course of 3 iPhones. But as long as they're running iOS 7, there's always an issue whether it's related to the settings app not opening or the email client forgetting her gmail account or even the inability to hang up a phone call!

We've gone from paying hundreds of dollars for a new OS update (Windows) to complaining about our free annual updates coming to our 4 year old smartphones and making them "slow".
Yes, that called progress. We've also gone from driving around in horses and buggies to automobiles, and have landed people on the moon.
 

Ok - 2 years.....I'm not talking about rooting and flashing. We're talking normal use case here.


It's also in beta. Wait for the release, and if you still can't tell if it's slower or not, I think you'll have proved my point.

My point was, saying something is "slower" is subjective. I used the 4S on iOS 7 beta and didn't see a lot of degradation in performance.

People can SAY whatever they want.

I'm only talking about the 4s, as that's what I have experience with. It's not a 4 year old phone, and in fact was being sold just a year ago.

3.5 year old device - regardless of whether or not it was being sold last year (and is still being sold now in some places). That's why it gets updates.


But there's no need to artificially limit them either.

Who's artificially limiting anything? It's not like Apple said - "Let's introduce iOS 7 and put it on the 4S and 4 to purposefully make them slower."

Yes, but not because the software magically broke after a certain date. You would have issue related to services changing their API's, or hardware problems.

Exactly - which is what I bet most 4 and 4S users are experiencing versus anything specifically tied back to iOS 7. That's the point - everyone wants to blame iOS 7 when there's really no proof any of the bugs were caused by the update. Especially when there are tens of millions of iOS users who DON'T experience these issues - even on the 4 and 4S. Does it suck to have a buggy phone? Yes. But to sue a company over issues that are within normal parameters for technology (especially 3-4 year old hardware) based on little to no evidence the OS being targeted has anything to do with it, that's simply ludicrous.

Why wouldn't they service a downgraded device? I can install Mavericks or Windows 8, and then revert to Lion or Windows 7 and still get service.

My experience with computer support has not been the same as my experience with smartphone support (just in general over owning various devices) - therefore I have a hard time equating the two. Simply stating its obviously much simpler for Apple CS is devices are running the same software as problems crop up and might affect various OS versions differently.


Actually, it's practically an auto-update if you let it. There's an update that nags you and the one time you accidentally hit "okay", it's all over.

It's a little red (1). Nothing "nagging" you - I have buddies who JUST NOW updated because they felt like it. Not that hard to ignore if you as so inclined.

And by "accidentally hitting OK" you mean going through about three or four different dialog boxes and hitting "accept/ok" each time....

It wasn't a service outage, it was an expired certificate. That's an easy fix. The fact that Apple isn't fixing it for iOS 6 users is what's ludicrous.

Yes, I hadn't done my research - you are correct. Something like this could be remedied if Apple updated their core apps independently of the OS. Something I think they should do.

TOS haven't been tested in court yet.

Given Apple's "experience" with litigation, my guess is the TOS is pretty air tight.....but I could be wrong. I don't read it. Still see it as very far-fetched this type of suit could gain any traction when almost all the choices in the process are voluntary.

Now if you wanted to sue for "taking away" features from iOS 6 users over the FaceTime thing, maybe you have something there. Still though - its Apple's servers running the service and their discretion to whom to provide service.

What do you think I've been dealing with, with my girlfriend? She's done 2 DFU restores, a restore or three from iCloud, and a "basic" restore over the course of 3 iPhones. But as long as they're running iOS 7, there's always an issue whether it's related to the settings app not opening or the email client forgetting her gmail account or even the inability to hang up a phone call!

I don't think that's specifically related to iOS 7. Never heard of any of those issues and - like I said - I have quite a few people in my life who are on 4S's and 5's with iOS 7. My co-worker has the problem that when he goes to unlock his phone, everything doubles and it becomes unresponsive. But that was happening before iOS 7. And that 4S has been passed around from other sales reps.....needs to be replaced regardless.

Yes, that called progress. We've also gone from driving around in horses and buggies to automobiles, and have landed people on the moon.

Agreed - but we also can't simply assume and expect there to be NO trouble (those automobiles have issues occasionally that horse/buggies didn't have). Technology isn't perfect nor does it work 100% of the time - no matter the OS running it.

----------

[/COLOR]It seems like the point is pretty much the opposite of that--users want to be able to stay with whatever version they had when they got the phone, for example, and have it work the way it did when they chose to get the phone based on how it worked at the time.

That seems so backwards to me - so you don't want to update and advance in feature set? Android would be perfect for you then - you can stay on the same software for forever after 2 years because you won't have the option to update....
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.